将教育发展中心转变为素质教育中心

{"title":"将教育发展中心转变为素质教育中心","authors":"","doi":"10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational Development (ED) also known as Academic Development (AD), Faculty Professional Development (FPD) and Faculty Development (FD)originated out of various context-based needs (student support, academic training, teaching, and learning success) in the different regions of the world. Educational Development (ED) remained outside the mainstream academic life of higher education institutions (HEI) for decades as appendages to learning and teaching transformation agendas. Four decades later, international higher education institutions require radical transformation of the former ED, AD, FPD and FD centres and initiatives to meet the needs of a new era, the ‘age of quality education’ in pursuit of research driven, discipline-integrated quality education approaches at Faculty, School, and College level. The paper presents a critical reflective review of educational development centres /models and highlights the shifting glocal (local and global) needs in HEIs for a comprehensive and integrated learning, teaching, and research approach to quality education. The author proposes that HEIs consider transforming existing centralized hybrid models of ED into discipline-integrated Quality Education Centres (QECs). The hybrid models may include several innovative approaches to institutional quality assurance processes drawn from the Australian Peer Review Portal initiative, the World Bank self-assurance training and development process in Bangladesh higher education, and the “subjects at risk” identification and review process at an Australian -Malaysian transnational university which implemented the PASS program to enhance student success. Discussion concludes with recommendations to establish discipline integrated QECs within institutions that embrace a sustainable, equitable, diverse, and inclusive quality education paradigm.","PeriodicalId":426882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming Educational Development Centres into Quality Education Centres\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Educational Development (ED) also known as Academic Development (AD), Faculty Professional Development (FPD) and Faculty Development (FD)originated out of various context-based needs (student support, academic training, teaching, and learning success) in the different regions of the world. Educational Development (ED) remained outside the mainstream academic life of higher education institutions (HEI) for decades as appendages to learning and teaching transformation agendas. Four decades later, international higher education institutions require radical transformation of the former ED, AD, FPD and FD centres and initiatives to meet the needs of a new era, the ‘age of quality education’ in pursuit of research driven, discipline-integrated quality education approaches at Faculty, School, and College level. The paper presents a critical reflective review of educational development centres /models and highlights the shifting glocal (local and global) needs in HEIs for a comprehensive and integrated learning, teaching, and research approach to quality education. The author proposes that HEIs consider transforming existing centralized hybrid models of ED into discipline-integrated Quality Education Centres (QECs). The hybrid models may include several innovative approaches to institutional quality assurance processes drawn from the Australian Peer Review Portal initiative, the World Bank self-assurance training and development process in Bangladesh higher education, and the “subjects at risk” identification and review process at an Australian -Malaysian transnational university which implemented the PASS program to enhance student success. Discussion concludes with recommendations to establish discipline integrated QECs within institutions that embrace a sustainable, equitable, diverse, and inclusive quality education paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育发展(ED)也被称为学术发展(AD)、教师专业发展(FPD)和教师发展(FD)起源于世界不同地区的各种基于情境的需求(学生支持、学术培训、教学和学习成功)。几十年来,教育发展一直游离于高等教育机构(HEI)的主流学术生活之外,作为学习和教学转型议程的附属品。四十年后的今天,国际高等教育机构需要对以前的教育发展、艺术发展、专业发展和专业发展中心进行彻底的改革,以适应“素质教育时代”的新时代的需要,在学院、学院和学院层面追求以研究为导向、学科综合的素质教育方法。本文对教育发展中心/模式进行了批判性反思,并强调了高等教育机构对全面和综合的学习、教学和研究方法的需求正在发生变化,以实现优质教育。作者建议高等学校考虑将现有的集中混合型教育模式转变为学科综合素质教育中心(qec)。混合模式可能包括从澳大利亚同行评议门户倡议、世界银行在孟加拉国高等教育中的自我保证培训和发展过程,以及在澳大利亚-马来西亚跨国大学实施PASS计划以提高学生成功的“风险科目”识别和审查过程中借鉴的若干创新方法。讨论最后提出建议,在机构内建立学科综合的质量教育中心,以实现可持续、公平、多样化和包容性的优质教育范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transforming Educational Development Centres into Quality Education Centres
Educational Development (ED) also known as Academic Development (AD), Faculty Professional Development (FPD) and Faculty Development (FD)originated out of various context-based needs (student support, academic training, teaching, and learning success) in the different regions of the world. Educational Development (ED) remained outside the mainstream academic life of higher education institutions (HEI) for decades as appendages to learning and teaching transformation agendas. Four decades later, international higher education institutions require radical transformation of the former ED, AD, FPD and FD centres and initiatives to meet the needs of a new era, the ‘age of quality education’ in pursuit of research driven, discipline-integrated quality education approaches at Faculty, School, and College level. The paper presents a critical reflective review of educational development centres /models and highlights the shifting glocal (local and global) needs in HEIs for a comprehensive and integrated learning, teaching, and research approach to quality education. The author proposes that HEIs consider transforming existing centralized hybrid models of ED into discipline-integrated Quality Education Centres (QECs). The hybrid models may include several innovative approaches to institutional quality assurance processes drawn from the Australian Peer Review Portal initiative, the World Bank self-assurance training and development process in Bangladesh higher education, and the “subjects at risk” identification and review process at an Australian -Malaysian transnational university which implemented the PASS program to enhance student success. Discussion concludes with recommendations to establish discipline integrated QECs within institutions that embrace a sustainable, equitable, diverse, and inclusive quality education paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underachiever Studies of Gifted and Talented Students: Types and Implications Study On Application of Open Online Psychological Courses to Mental Health Education of College Students Kajian Jati Diri Holistik Pelajar Pintar dan Berbakat di Malaysia Measuring Student Adoption of Digital Platforms for Distance Education among University Students in Malaysia Penerapan Konsep Malaysia MADANI dalam Dasar Awam: Membudayakan Harmoni dalam Kepelbagaian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1