{"title":"性激进主义与浪漫爱情","authors":"David Calderwood","doi":"10.1300/J291V05N02_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a study of the ideas and experiences of 100 sexual radicals, an ideal-typical version of the popular notion of love is presented. Additionally, four basic modes of entertaining or responding to that dominant notion are set out. In this way the respondents are seen as struggling to combine a highly critical sexual ideology with a much more conservative socialization for intimacy.","PeriodicalId":262605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social work and human sexuality","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Radicalism and Romantic Love\",\"authors\":\"David Calderwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J291V05N02_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From a study of the ideas and experiences of 100 sexual radicals, an ideal-typical version of the popular notion of love is presented. Additionally, four basic modes of entertaining or responding to that dominant notion are set out. In this way the respondents are seen as struggling to combine a highly critical sexual ideology with a much more conservative socialization for intimacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of social work and human sexuality\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of social work and human sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J291V05N02_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social work and human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J291V05N02_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
From a study of the ideas and experiences of 100 sexual radicals, an ideal-typical version of the popular notion of love is presented. Additionally, four basic modes of entertaining or responding to that dominant notion are set out. In this way the respondents are seen as struggling to combine a highly critical sexual ideology with a much more conservative socialization for intimacy.