基于时序逻辑和AOP的操作系统内核自动演化研究

Rickard A. Åberg, J. Lawall, Mario Südholt, Gilles Muller, A. L. Meur
{"title":"基于时序逻辑和AOP的操作系统内核自动演化研究","authors":"Rickard A. Åberg, J. Lawall, Mario Südholt, Gilles Muller, A. L. Meur","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2003.1240307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automating software evolution requires both identifying precisely the affected program points and selecting the appropriate modification at each point. This task is particularly complicated when considering a large program, even when the modifications appear to be systematic. We illustrate this situation in the context of evolving the Linux kernel to support Bossa, an event-based framework for process-scheduler development. To support Bossa, events must be added at points scattered throughout the kernel. In each case, the choice of event depends on properties of one or a sequence of instructions. To describe precisely the choice of event, we propose to guide the event insertion by using a set of rules, amounting to an aspect that describes the control-flow contexts in which each event should be generated. In this paper, we present our approach and describe the set of rules that allows proper event insertion. These rules use temporal logic to describe sequences of instructions that require events to be inserted. We also give an overview of an implementation that we have developed to automatically perform this evolution.","PeriodicalId":114604,"journal":{"name":"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the automatic evolution of an OS kernel using temporal logic and AOP\",\"authors\":\"Rickard A. Åberg, J. Lawall, Mario Südholt, Gilles Muller, A. L. Meur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2003.1240307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automating software evolution requires both identifying precisely the affected program points and selecting the appropriate modification at each point. This task is particularly complicated when considering a large program, even when the modifications appear to be systematic. We illustrate this situation in the context of evolving the Linux kernel to support Bossa, an event-based framework for process-scheduler development. To support Bossa, events must be added at points scattered throughout the kernel. In each case, the choice of event depends on properties of one or a sequence of instructions. To describe precisely the choice of event, we propose to guide the event insertion by using a set of rules, amounting to an aspect that describes the control-flow contexts in which each event should be generated. In this paper, we present our approach and describe the set of rules that allows proper event insertion. These rules use temporal logic to describe sequences of instructions that require events to be inserted. We also give an overview of an implementation that we have developed to automatically perform this evolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"200 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2003.1240307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2003.1240307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

自动化软件发展需要精确地识别受影响的程序点,并在每个点选择适当的修改。在考虑大型程序时,这项任务尤其复杂,即使修改看起来是系统的。我们将在改进Linux内核以支持Bossa(一种用于进程调度器开发的基于事件的框架)的上下文中说明这种情况。为了支持Bossa,必须在整个内核中分散的点添加事件。在每种情况下,事件的选择取决于一个或一系列指令的属性。为了精确地描述事件的选择,我们建议通过使用一组规则来指导事件插入,这相当于一个方面,该方面描述了应该在其中生成每个事件的控制流上下文。在本文中,我们提出了我们的方法,并描述了一组允许适当的事件插入的规则。这些规则使用时序逻辑来描述需要插入事件的指令序列。我们还概述了我们开发的用于自动执行此演变的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the automatic evolution of an OS kernel using temporal logic and AOP
Automating software evolution requires both identifying precisely the affected program points and selecting the appropriate modification at each point. This task is particularly complicated when considering a large program, even when the modifications appear to be systematic. We illustrate this situation in the context of evolving the Linux kernel to support Bossa, an event-based framework for process-scheduler development. To support Bossa, events must be added at points scattered throughout the kernel. In each case, the choice of event depends on properties of one or a sequence of instructions. To describe precisely the choice of event, we propose to guide the event insertion by using a set of rules, amounting to an aspect that describes the control-flow contexts in which each event should be generated. In this paper, we present our approach and describe the set of rules that allows proper event insertion. These rules use temporal logic to describe sequences of instructions that require events to be inserted. We also give an overview of an implementation that we have developed to automatically perform this evolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual constraint diagrams: runtime conformance checking of UML object models versus implementations A model-driven approach to non-functional analysis of software architectures Overview of OpenModel-based validation with partial information Semi-automatic fault localization and behavior verification for physical system simulation models Automation for exception freedom proofs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1