Constança Carvalho, D. Alves, A. Knight, Luís Vicente
{"title":"基于动物的生物医学研究是否在其原始背景下使用?","authors":"Constança Carvalho, D. Alves, A. Knight, Luís Vicente","doi":"10.1163/9789004391192_017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the second half of the twentieth century, non-human animals (herein after referred to as animals) have been widely used as models for researching human disorders. Historically, this occurred for two main reasons: a) animals are complex living systems; and b) it is considered less ethically-contentious as well as easier, quicker, and cheaper to use animals than humans. Their ben efit for biomedical advancement is assumed even though systematic evalua tions, though uncommon, suggest otherwise. It is crucial to evaluate whether animal-based biomedical research successfully benefits medical research even through indirect pathways-or if it is being used merely to justify further animal-based research. In this chapter we demonstrate that there is a lack of communication between animal-based research and clinical research. We dis cuss possible reasons for this and reflect on whether animal use in biomedical research is, indeed, fulfilling its primary purpose. Humans share a long evolutionary story with the rest of the animal king dom, which explains common physiological and behavioral traits and ad aptations. For example, basal ganglia, a set of subcortical nuclei involved in","PeriodicalId":138056,"journal":{"name":"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Animal-based Biomedical Research Being Used in Its Original Context?\",\"authors\":\"Constança Carvalho, D. Alves, A. Knight, Luís Vicente\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004391192_017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the second half of the twentieth century, non-human animals (herein after referred to as animals) have been widely used as models for researching human disorders. Historically, this occurred for two main reasons: a) animals are complex living systems; and b) it is considered less ethically-contentious as well as easier, quicker, and cheaper to use animals than humans. Their ben efit for biomedical advancement is assumed even though systematic evalua tions, though uncommon, suggest otherwise. It is crucial to evaluate whether animal-based biomedical research successfully benefits medical research even through indirect pathways-or if it is being used merely to justify further animal-based research. In this chapter we demonstrate that there is a lack of communication between animal-based research and clinical research. We dis cuss possible reasons for this and reflect on whether animal use in biomedical research is, indeed, fulfilling its primary purpose. Humans share a long evolutionary story with the rest of the animal king dom, which explains common physiological and behavioral traits and ad aptations. For example, basal ganglia, a set of subcortical nuclei involved in\",\"PeriodicalId\":138056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391192_017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391192_017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Animal-based Biomedical Research Being Used in Its Original Context?
Since the second half of the twentieth century, non-human animals (herein after referred to as animals) have been widely used as models for researching human disorders. Historically, this occurred for two main reasons: a) animals are complex living systems; and b) it is considered less ethically-contentious as well as easier, quicker, and cheaper to use animals than humans. Their ben efit for biomedical advancement is assumed even though systematic evalua tions, though uncommon, suggest otherwise. It is crucial to evaluate whether animal-based biomedical research successfully benefits medical research even through indirect pathways-or if it is being used merely to justify further animal-based research. In this chapter we demonstrate that there is a lack of communication between animal-based research and clinical research. We dis cuss possible reasons for this and reflect on whether animal use in biomedical research is, indeed, fulfilling its primary purpose. Humans share a long evolutionary story with the rest of the animal king dom, which explains common physiological and behavioral traits and ad aptations. For example, basal ganglia, a set of subcortical nuclei involved in