{"title":"谁从社会救助中获益?印度尼西亚的Rastra, pip和PKH项目","authors":"Abrian Duta Firmansyah, Akhmad Solikin","doi":"10.48108/JURNALBPPK.V12I1.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social assistance is one of government’s strategies in alleviating poverty and reducing inequality. This article analyses impact of social assistances in terms of Prosperous Rice (Beras Sejahtera, Rastra), Indonesia Intelligent Program (Program Indonesia Pintar, PIP), and Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan, PKH) on poverty and inequality, and problems related to implementation of these programs. Impact analysis was carried out using the benefit incidence analysis by using household surveys (Susenas) data March 2017, while problems in the fields were collected from literature and mass media analyses. The results indicate that social assistances in Indonesia impacted on alleviating poverty and reducing inequality, as well as absolute progressive in nature. Rastra is the most able to reduce poverty and equality compared to PKH and PIP. However, further improvements are needed to overcome the leakage in the distribution of social assistances. Literature and mass media reviews showed that data on recipients of social assistances were not up to date and disbursement of assistances violated existing regulations.","PeriodicalId":441780,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal BPPK : Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHO GAINS FROM SOCIAL ASSISTANCES? RASTRA, PIP, AND PKH PROGRAMS IN INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Abrian Duta Firmansyah, Akhmad Solikin\",\"doi\":\"10.48108/JURNALBPPK.V12I1.372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social assistance is one of government’s strategies in alleviating poverty and reducing inequality. This article analyses impact of social assistances in terms of Prosperous Rice (Beras Sejahtera, Rastra), Indonesia Intelligent Program (Program Indonesia Pintar, PIP), and Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan, PKH) on poverty and inequality, and problems related to implementation of these programs. Impact analysis was carried out using the benefit incidence analysis by using household surveys (Susenas) data March 2017, while problems in the fields were collected from literature and mass media analyses. The results indicate that social assistances in Indonesia impacted on alleviating poverty and reducing inequality, as well as absolute progressive in nature. Rastra is the most able to reduce poverty and equality compared to PKH and PIP. However, further improvements are needed to overcome the leakage in the distribution of social assistances. Literature and mass media reviews showed that data on recipients of social assistances were not up to date and disbursement of assistances violated existing regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal BPPK : Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal BPPK : Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48108/JURNALBPPK.V12I1.372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal BPPK : Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48108/JURNALBPPK.V12I1.372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
社会救助是政府减轻贫困和减少不平等的战略之一。本文分析了繁荣大米(Beras Sejahtera, Rastra)、印度尼西亚智能计划(Program Indonesia Pintar, PIP)和家庭希望计划(Program Keluarga Harapan, PKH)等社会援助对贫困和不平等的影响,以及与这些计划实施相关的问题。使用2017年3月住户调查(Susenas)数据进行效益发生率分析,进行影响分析,同时通过文献和大众媒体分析收集实地问题。结果表明,印度尼西亚的社会援助对减轻贫困和减少不平等具有一定的影响,并且具有绝对的进步性。与PKH和PIP相比,Rastra最有能力减少贫困和平等。但是,还需要进一步改进,以克服社会援助分配方面的漏洞。文献和大众传播媒介的审查表明,关于社会援助接受者的数据不是最新的,援助的支付违反了现行条例。
WHO GAINS FROM SOCIAL ASSISTANCES? RASTRA, PIP, AND PKH PROGRAMS IN INDONESIA
Social assistance is one of government’s strategies in alleviating poverty and reducing inequality. This article analyses impact of social assistances in terms of Prosperous Rice (Beras Sejahtera, Rastra), Indonesia Intelligent Program (Program Indonesia Pintar, PIP), and Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan, PKH) on poverty and inequality, and problems related to implementation of these programs. Impact analysis was carried out using the benefit incidence analysis by using household surveys (Susenas) data March 2017, while problems in the fields were collected from literature and mass media analyses. The results indicate that social assistances in Indonesia impacted on alleviating poverty and reducing inequality, as well as absolute progressive in nature. Rastra is the most able to reduce poverty and equality compared to PKH and PIP. However, further improvements are needed to overcome the leakage in the distribution of social assistances. Literature and mass media reviews showed that data on recipients of social assistances were not up to date and disbursement of assistances violated existing regulations.