{"title":"交付了","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the appropriate remedy for the claimant to recover its goods where the defendant is tortiously ‘interfering’ with them under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977. By the remedy the defendant is ordered to deliver the goods to, or to allow them to be taken by, the claimant. Delivery up therefore belongs alongside the mandatory restorative injunction as a remedy concerned to compel the undoing of a wrong.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivery up\",\"authors\":\"A. Burrows\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the appropriate remedy for the claimant to recover its goods where the defendant is tortiously ‘interfering’ with them under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977. By the remedy the defendant is ordered to deliver the goods to, or to allow them to be taken by, the claimant. Delivery up therefore belongs alongside the mandatory restorative injunction as a remedy concerned to compel the undoing of a wrong.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This is the appropriate remedy for the claimant to recover its goods where the defendant is tortiously ‘interfering’ with them under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977. By the remedy the defendant is ordered to deliver the goods to, or to allow them to be taken by, the claimant. Delivery up therefore belongs alongside the mandatory restorative injunction as a remedy concerned to compel the undoing of a wrong.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
