五班科学学习内容中主题概念理解评价的发展。

Yusri Adi, N. Bakhtiar, R. Vebrianto, Adisti Yuliastrin
{"title":"五班科学学习内容中主题概念理解评价的发展。","authors":"Yusri Adi, N. Bakhtiar, R. Vebrianto, Adisti Yuliastrin","doi":"10.35580/sainsmat121391652023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems that are often faced by educators in measuring the level of understanding of students' concepts are questions that are made to have a low cognitive level and short answers which make the questions unable to properly measure the students' understanding. This study is useful in describing how the feasibility of a concept understanding assessment instrument is. The research design in this study is Research and Development based on the Borg & Gall model by only carrying out 5 steps due to several reasons. The subject of this research is an instrument for assessing the ability to understand concepts. The results of the analysis of the 12 assessment questions are feasible to use because they have a validity value of 0.56 with a \"enough\" category and a reliability value of 0.72 with a \"enough\" category and can be said to be a valid research instrument. And because there are 3 questions that have a negative significant value (-) then questions number 2, 10 and 12 are omitted so that this instrument is more valid.","PeriodicalId":347044,"journal":{"name":"Sainsmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Thematic Concept Understanding Assessment In Class V Science Learning Content.\",\"authors\":\"Yusri Adi, N. Bakhtiar, R. Vebrianto, Adisti Yuliastrin\",\"doi\":\"10.35580/sainsmat121391652023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problems that are often faced by educators in measuring the level of understanding of students' concepts are questions that are made to have a low cognitive level and short answers which make the questions unable to properly measure the students' understanding. This study is useful in describing how the feasibility of a concept understanding assessment instrument is. The research design in this study is Research and Development based on the Borg & Gall model by only carrying out 5 steps due to several reasons. The subject of this research is an instrument for assessing the ability to understand concepts. The results of the analysis of the 12 assessment questions are feasible to use because they have a validity value of 0.56 with a \\\"enough\\\" category and a reliability value of 0.72 with a \\\"enough\\\" category and can be said to be a valid research instrument. And because there are 3 questions that have a negative significant value (-) then questions number 2, 10 and 12 are omitted so that this instrument is more valid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sainsmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sainsmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35580/sainsmat121391652023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sainsmat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35580/sainsmat121391652023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育工作者在衡量学生对概念的理解程度时经常面临的问题是,问题的认知水平低,答案简短,无法正确衡量学生的理解程度。本研究有助于描述概念理解评估工具的可行性。本研究的研究设计是基于Borg & Gall模型的research and Development,由于几个原因,只进行了5个步骤。本研究的主题是评估理解概念能力的工具。12个评估题的分析结果在“足够”类别下的效度值为0.56,在“足够”类别下的信度值为0.72,具有可行性,可以说是一个有效的研究工具。由于有3个问题具有负显著值(-),因此问题2,10和12被省略,因此该工具更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Thematic Concept Understanding Assessment In Class V Science Learning Content.
Problems that are often faced by educators in measuring the level of understanding of students' concepts are questions that are made to have a low cognitive level and short answers which make the questions unable to properly measure the students' understanding. This study is useful in describing how the feasibility of a concept understanding assessment instrument is. The research design in this study is Research and Development based on the Borg & Gall model by only carrying out 5 steps due to several reasons. The subject of this research is an instrument for assessing the ability to understand concepts. The results of the analysis of the 12 assessment questions are feasible to use because they have a validity value of 0.56 with a "enough" category and a reliability value of 0.72 with a "enough" category and can be said to be a valid research instrument. And because there are 3 questions that have a negative significant value (-) then questions number 2, 10 and 12 are omitted so that this instrument is more valid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Treffinger terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas XI MIPA SMAN 2 Majene Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa d alam Pembelajaran IPA Kelas VII di SMP Bosowa School Makassar Pengembangan Instrumen Berpikir Kritis : Tutor Identifikasi Berfikir Kritis Dispersi: Studi Pendahuluan Revitalisasi Pemanfaatan Karbon Aktif sebagai Material Elektroda. Efektivitas Penggunaan Video Youtube dalam Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas X MIPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Wonomulyo (Studi pada Materi Pokok Reaksi Reduksi dan Oksidasi)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1