Covid-19后劳动力细分的未来

M. B. Salem
{"title":"Covid-19后劳动力细分的未来","authors":"M. B. Salem","doi":"10.4324/9781003220145-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labour segmentation in national markets roughly operates through two porous borders, separating jobs into sectors - formal vs. informal ones - and into status - self-employed vs. paid employed, but characterized by a lot of overlaps. It results from the process of job creation, determined partly by labour-saving innovations in production and by globalization. The chapter is an essay to describe how the pandemic interacts with these two factors to potentially reshape the allocation of jobs between informal self-employment and formal paid employment or other possible combinations. The main findings are that the impact of these interactions is highly unclear on the medium- or long-term trend of labour. Self-employment has been an answer in most countries to the job shortage in its most prevalent informal form. The pandemic by reducing total employment in the short run first destroys low-paid employment but without challenging the current trajectory of employment along segmentation - low job creation driven by higher digitalization. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ananya Ghosh Dastidar and Soumyen Sikdar;individual chapters, the contributors.","PeriodicalId":113535,"journal":{"name":"The COVID-19 Pandemic, India and the World","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The future of labour segmentation after Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"M. B. Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003220145-28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Labour segmentation in national markets roughly operates through two porous borders, separating jobs into sectors - formal vs. informal ones - and into status - self-employed vs. paid employed, but characterized by a lot of overlaps. It results from the process of job creation, determined partly by labour-saving innovations in production and by globalization. The chapter is an essay to describe how the pandemic interacts with these two factors to potentially reshape the allocation of jobs between informal self-employment and formal paid employment or other possible combinations. The main findings are that the impact of these interactions is highly unclear on the medium- or long-term trend of labour. Self-employment has been an answer in most countries to the job shortage in its most prevalent informal form. The pandemic by reducing total employment in the short run first destroys low-paid employment but without challenging the current trajectory of employment along segmentation - low job creation driven by higher digitalization. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ananya Ghosh Dastidar and Soumyen Sikdar;individual chapters, the contributors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The COVID-19 Pandemic, India and the World\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The COVID-19 Pandemic, India and the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220145-28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The COVID-19 Pandemic, India and the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220145-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国内市场的劳动力分割大致通过两个漏洞百出的边界运作,将工作划分为正式和非正式部门,并将工作划分为个体经营和有偿就业,但其特点是有很多重叠。它产生于创造就业的过程,部分是由节省劳动力的生产创新和全球化决定的。本章是一篇文章,描述大流行如何与这两个因素相互作用,从而可能重塑非正规自营职业与正式有偿就业或其他可能的组合之间的工作分配。主要发现是,这些相互作用对劳动力中长期趋势的影响是非常不清楚的。在大多数国家,自营职业以其最普遍的非正式形式解决了工作短缺问题。大流行在短期内减少了总就业,首先摧毁了低薪就业,但没有挑战目前的就业细分轨迹——由更高的数字化驱动的低就业创造。©2022选择和编辑事项,Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ananya Ghosh Dastidar和Soumyen Sikdar;个人章节,贡献者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The future of labour segmentation after Covid-19
Labour segmentation in national markets roughly operates through two porous borders, separating jobs into sectors - formal vs. informal ones - and into status - self-employed vs. paid employed, but characterized by a lot of overlaps. It results from the process of job creation, determined partly by labour-saving innovations in production and by globalization. The chapter is an essay to describe how the pandemic interacts with these two factors to potentially reshape the allocation of jobs between informal self-employment and formal paid employment or other possible combinations. The main findings are that the impact of these interactions is highly unclear on the medium- or long-term trend of labour. Self-employment has been an answer in most countries to the job shortage in its most prevalent informal form. The pandemic by reducing total employment in the short run first destroys low-paid employment but without challenging the current trajectory of employment along segmentation - low job creation driven by higher digitalization. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ananya Ghosh Dastidar and Soumyen Sikdar;individual chapters, the contributors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labour and the pandemic Higher education in the Post-Covid era India's Lockdown* The Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on global political economy The long shadow of epidemics1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1