{"title":"沙赫拉斯塔尼的《教派与信条》作为伊斯玛仪派的来源:哲学史范式的转换","authors":"M. Volf","doi":"10.47850/rl.2021.2.2.18-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Karīm al-Shahrastani is a well-known source in the West about Islamic and non-Islamic religious teachings. His “Book on Sects and Creeds” has so far been considered in the history of philosophy among the Asharite doxographic works. At present, the evaluation of this work in the history of philosophy is radically changing: from the Asharite doxography its evaluation is shifted to the opposite pole - Isma’ili heresiography. The paper presents historical and biographical facts, as well as a brief description of the main works that allow us to include al-Shahrastani in the Isma’ili context. It analyzes the Shahrastani's preface to Kitab al-milal wa-n-nihal, which clearly shows the coherence of this section, including the methodology and structure of the treatise indicated by the author himself, with other Isma’ili books, in particular with the “Chapter on Shaytan” from Kitab al-Shajar Abu Tammam. Using the example of the switching of this book evaluations, we want to argue against the point of view that insists on the conservatism of the philosophical canon ostensibly created and observed by the history of philosophy, and to show that the history of philosophy research, although it depends on speculative interpretations, is fundamentally an empirical work, essentially dependent on the facts which role played by the sources, and the decisive factor in changing the \"paradigm\" in history of philosophy or the philosophical canon is primarily our trust in the sources and their careful reading in various contexts.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“THE BOOK OF SECTS AND CREEDS” BY AL-SHAHRASTANI AS AN ISMAILI SOURCE: SWITCH THE PARADIGM IN HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"authors\":\"M. Volf\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/rl.2021.2.2.18-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Karīm al-Shahrastani is a well-known source in the West about Islamic and non-Islamic religious teachings. His “Book on Sects and Creeds” has so far been considered in the history of philosophy among the Asharite doxographic works. At present, the evaluation of this work in the history of philosophy is radically changing: from the Asharite doxography its evaluation is shifted to the opposite pole - Isma’ili heresiography. The paper presents historical and biographical facts, as well as a brief description of the main works that allow us to include al-Shahrastani in the Isma’ili context. It analyzes the Shahrastani's preface to Kitab al-milal wa-n-nihal, which clearly shows the coherence of this section, including the methodology and structure of the treatise indicated by the author himself, with other Isma’ili books, in particular with the “Chapter on Shaytan” from Kitab al-Shajar Abu Tammam. Using the example of the switching of this book evaluations, we want to argue against the point of view that insists on the conservatism of the philosophical canon ostensibly created and observed by the history of philosophy, and to show that the history of philosophy research, although it depends on speculative interpretations, is fundamentally an empirical work, essentially dependent on the facts which role played by the sources, and the decisive factor in changing the \\\"paradigm\\\" in history of philosophy or the philosophical canon is primarily our trust in the sources and their careful reading in various contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/rl.2021.2.2.18-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/rl.2021.2.2.18-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Muhammad ibn ' Abd al- kar m al-Shahrastani是西方关于伊斯兰和非伊斯兰宗教教义的著名来源。到目前为止,他的《论教派和信条的书》被认为是哲学史上亚沙利人的文献著作之一。目前,在哲学史上对这项工作的评价正在发生根本性的变化:从阿沙利的doxography,它的评价转移到相反的极- Isma 'ili异端。本文介绍了历史和传记事实,以及主要作品的简要描述,使我们能够将al-Shahrastani包括在Isma 'ili的背景下。它分析了Shahrastani对Kitab al-milal wa-n-nihal的序言,它清楚地显示了这一部分的一致性,包括作者自己指出的论文的方法和结构,与其他Isma 'ili书籍,特别是Kitab al-Shajar Abu Tammam的“关于Shaytan的章节”。以这本书评价的转换为例,我们想要反驳那种坚持哲学经典的保守主义的观点,这种保守主义表面上是由哲学史创造和观察的,并表明哲学研究的历史,尽管它依赖于思辨的解释,但从根本上来说是一种经验主义的工作,本质上依赖于事实,即来源所扮演的角色,而改变哲学史或哲学经典“范式”的决定性因素,主要是我们对资料来源的信任,以及在不同语境下对它们的仔细阅读。
“THE BOOK OF SECTS AND CREEDS” BY AL-SHAHRASTANI AS AN ISMAILI SOURCE: SWITCH THE PARADIGM IN HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Karīm al-Shahrastani is a well-known source in the West about Islamic and non-Islamic religious teachings. His “Book on Sects and Creeds” has so far been considered in the history of philosophy among the Asharite doxographic works. At present, the evaluation of this work in the history of philosophy is radically changing: from the Asharite doxography its evaluation is shifted to the opposite pole - Isma’ili heresiography. The paper presents historical and biographical facts, as well as a brief description of the main works that allow us to include al-Shahrastani in the Isma’ili context. It analyzes the Shahrastani's preface to Kitab al-milal wa-n-nihal, which clearly shows the coherence of this section, including the methodology and structure of the treatise indicated by the author himself, with other Isma’ili books, in particular with the “Chapter on Shaytan” from Kitab al-Shajar Abu Tammam. Using the example of the switching of this book evaluations, we want to argue against the point of view that insists on the conservatism of the philosophical canon ostensibly created and observed by the history of philosophy, and to show that the history of philosophy research, although it depends on speculative interpretations, is fundamentally an empirical work, essentially dependent on the facts which role played by the sources, and the decisive factor in changing the "paradigm" in history of philosophy or the philosophical canon is primarily our trust in the sources and their careful reading in various contexts.