谁应该为员工的技能提升买单?

R. Vranceanu, A. Sutan
{"title":"谁应该为员工的技能提升买单?","authors":"R. Vranceanu, A. Sutan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3719009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upskilling is an investment in human capital that allows a worker to successfully undertake a new task or new project within his/her existing job. It involves costly e⁄ort on behalf of the employee to acquire new skills and new knowledge. In this context, one essential question for managers is whether to invest in workersupskilling or let them pay for the investment in human capital and compensate them accordingly. Using traditional contract theory analysis, we show that the latter choice is not cost-neutral since the most exible workers benet of an informational rent. A prot comparison shows that it might be in the interest of a company to invest in worker upskilling, rather than to rely on worker self-training.","PeriodicalId":119201,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","volume":"333 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Should Pay the Bill for Employee Upskilling?\",\"authors\":\"R. Vranceanu, A. Sutan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3719009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Upskilling is an investment in human capital that allows a worker to successfully undertake a new task or new project within his/her existing job. It involves costly e⁄ort on behalf of the employee to acquire new skills and new knowledge. In this context, one essential question for managers is whether to invest in workersupskilling or let them pay for the investment in human capital and compensate them accordingly. Using traditional contract theory analysis, we show that the latter choice is not cost-neutral since the most exible workers benet of an informational rent. A prot comparison shows that it might be in the interest of a company to invest in worker upskilling, rather than to rely on worker self-training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"volume\":\"333 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3719009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3719009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提升技能是对人力资本的一种投资,它使工人能够在现有工作中成功地承担新任务或新项目。代表员工学习新技能和新知识需要付出昂贵的努力。在这种背景下,管理者面临的一个重要问题是,是投资于工人的技能培训,还是让他们为人力资本投资买单,并给予相应的补偿。利用传统的契约理论分析,我们发现后一种选择不是成本中性的,因为最灵活的工人从信息租金中受益。一项项目比较表明,投资于提高工人技能,而不是依靠工人自我培训,可能符合公司的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Should Pay the Bill for Employee Upskilling?
Upskilling is an investment in human capital that allows a worker to successfully undertake a new task or new project within his/her existing job. It involves costly e⁄ort on behalf of the employee to acquire new skills and new knowledge. In this context, one essential question for managers is whether to invest in workersupskilling or let them pay for the investment in human capital and compensate them accordingly. Using traditional contract theory analysis, we show that the latter choice is not cost-neutral since the most exible workers benet of an informational rent. A prot comparison shows that it might be in the interest of a company to invest in worker upskilling, rather than to rely on worker self-training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality and Pricing Decisions for Reward-based Crowdfunding: Effects of Moral Hazard Punish Underperformance with Resting Optimal Dynamic Contracts in the Presence of Switching Cost A reconsideration of the Rothschild-Stiglitz insurance market model by information theory Learning from Law Enforcement Pulp Friction: The Value of Quantity Contracts in Decentralized Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1