在互动的化学工程实验室环境中鼓励批判性思维

R.L. Miller, B. Olds
{"title":"在互动的化学工程实验室环境中鼓励批判性思维","authors":"R.L. Miller, B. Olds","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1994.580590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering educators are increasingly concerned that most engineering courses continue to emphasize \"plugging and cranking\" on well-defined, close-ended, numerical problems at the expense of helping students become better critical thinkers and engineering practitioners. As a result, in sharp contrast with other professions such as medicine and law, far too few engineering graduates are capable of immediately practicing engineering when they leave educational institutions. The Colorado School of Mines (USA) offers an intensive engineering operations laboratory designed to enhance students' higher order thinking skills and familiarity with engineering professional practice. In its present form, the course relies heavily on a constructivist approach using team-based, open-ended unit operations experiments. Here, the authors describe the course and present evidence that allowing students to \"make meaning\" of objective engineering knowledge helps enhance their ability to critically analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the results of their laboratory work.","PeriodicalId":288591,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encouraging critical thinking in an interactive chemical engineering laboratory environment\",\"authors\":\"R.L. Miller, B. Olds\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1994.580590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Engineering educators are increasingly concerned that most engineering courses continue to emphasize \\\"plugging and cranking\\\" on well-defined, close-ended, numerical problems at the expense of helping students become better critical thinkers and engineering practitioners. As a result, in sharp contrast with other professions such as medicine and law, far too few engineering graduates are capable of immediately practicing engineering when they leave educational institutions. The Colorado School of Mines (USA) offers an intensive engineering operations laboratory designed to enhance students' higher order thinking skills and familiarity with engineering professional practice. In its present form, the course relies heavily on a constructivist approach using team-based, open-ended unit operations experiments. Here, the authors describe the course and present evidence that allowing students to \\\"make meaning\\\" of objective engineering knowledge helps enhance their ability to critically analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the results of their laboratory work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.580590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.580590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

工程教育工作者越来越担心,大多数工程课程继续强调在定义明确、封闭的数值问题上“埋头苦干”,而不是帮助学生成为更好的批判性思考者和工程实践者。因此,与医学和法律等其他专业形成鲜明对比的是,很少有工程专业的毕业生在离开教育机构后能够立即从事工程实践。科罗拉多矿业学院(美国)提供了一个密集的工程操作实验室,旨在提高学生的高阶思维能力和熟悉工程专业实践。在目前的形式中,课程主要依赖于基于团队的开放式单元操作实验的建构主义方法。在这里,作者描述了这门课程,并提供了证据,证明允许学生“理解”客观的工程知识有助于提高他们批判性分析、综合和评估实验室工作结果的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Encouraging critical thinking in an interactive chemical engineering laboratory environment
Engineering educators are increasingly concerned that most engineering courses continue to emphasize "plugging and cranking" on well-defined, close-ended, numerical problems at the expense of helping students become better critical thinkers and engineering practitioners. As a result, in sharp contrast with other professions such as medicine and law, far too few engineering graduates are capable of immediately practicing engineering when they leave educational institutions. The Colorado School of Mines (USA) offers an intensive engineering operations laboratory designed to enhance students' higher order thinking skills and familiarity with engineering professional practice. In its present form, the course relies heavily on a constructivist approach using team-based, open-ended unit operations experiments. Here, the authors describe the course and present evidence that allowing students to "make meaning" of objective engineering knowledge helps enhance their ability to critically analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the results of their laboratory work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using local area networks to improve learning efficiency Progress report on the computers in manufacturing engineering knowledge thread The International Faculty of Engineering: an English-based global perspective in the heart of Central Europe Creating a smooth transition between the classroom and laboratory via computer simulation The optical engineering curriculum at CSUS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1