高频交易对市场波动的影响

G. Virgilio
{"title":"高频交易对市场波动的影响","authors":"G. Virgilio","doi":"10.3905/jot.2016.11.2.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of an agent-based model simulation under two different cases: a quiet situation and a market following a trend. Although the quiet situation does not identify any abnormal behavior, participation of high-frequency (HF) traders leads to a statistically significant increase in volatility when the market is under stress. This result can be explained by the delay suffered by market orders posted by low-frequency traders during a trend. These trades are often executed at a price that, because of its rapid movements, is worse than was intended when it was posted a few milliseconds earlier, thus increasing volatility. As the number of HF traders increases, volatility starts to diminish again. This can be explained by the more homogeneous situation that occurs when most trading is executed by players experiencing similar latencies.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Market Volatility\",\"authors\":\"G. Virgilio\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jot.2016.11.2.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the results of an agent-based model simulation under two different cases: a quiet situation and a market following a trend. Although the quiet situation does not identify any abnormal behavior, participation of high-frequency (HF) traders leads to a statistically significant increase in volatility when the market is under stress. This result can be explained by the delay suffered by market orders posted by low-frequency traders during a trend. These trades are often executed at a price that, because of its rapid movements, is worse than was intended when it was posted a few milliseconds earlier, thus increasing volatility. As the number of HF traders increases, volatility starts to diminish again. This can be explained by the more homogeneous situation that occurs when most trading is executed by players experiencing similar latencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2016.11.2.055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2016.11.2.055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文给出了基于智能体的模型在两种不同情况下的模拟结果:安静的情况和跟随趋势的市场。虽然平静的情况并不能确定任何异常行为,但高频交易者的参与会导致市场处于压力之下时波动性的统计显著增加。这种结果可以解释为低频率交易者在趋势期间发布市场订单所遭受的延迟。这些交易的执行价格,由于变动迅速,往往低于几毫秒前公布的预期价格,从而增加了波动性。随着高频交易者数量的增加,波动性开始再次下降。这可以用更同质的情况来解释,即大多数交易是由经历类似延迟的玩家执行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Market Volatility
This article presents the results of an agent-based model simulation under two different cases: a quiet situation and a market following a trend. Although the quiet situation does not identify any abnormal behavior, participation of high-frequency (HF) traders leads to a statistically significant increase in volatility when the market is under stress. This result can be explained by the delay suffered by market orders posted by low-frequency traders during a trend. These trades are often executed at a price that, because of its rapid movements, is worse than was intended when it was posted a few milliseconds earlier, thus increasing volatility. As the number of HF traders increases, volatility starts to diminish again. This can be explained by the more homogeneous situation that occurs when most trading is executed by players experiencing similar latencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phantom Liquidity and High-Frequency Quoting COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1 Editor’s Letter Machine Learning for Algorithmic Trading and Trade Schedule Optimization COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1