人工湿地作为传统工业废水处理的替代方案,促进碳固存,实现可持续的未来

Sew Keng Tan, M. M. M. Shah, S. Sufian, Pui Vun Chai
{"title":"人工湿地作为传统工业废水处理的替代方案,促进碳固存,实现可持续的未来","authors":"Sew Keng Tan, M. M. M. Shah, S. Sufian, Pui Vun Chai","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22913-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Constructed wetlands (CW) are man-made systems that mimic the natural wetlands. They can be used for various purposes, including wastewater treatment, stormwater management, and carbon sequestration. Wetlands naturally absorb and store carbon from the atmosphere, and CW can replicate this process by using plants and microorganisms to remove and store carbon from the water. Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) use more energy and contribute to carbon emissions, so many industries are looking for ways to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. While CW have been widely used for municipal and sewage treatment, their use as an alternative or supplement to industrial wastewater treatment, particularly in the oil and gas and petrochemical industries, is limited. However, CW have the potential to promote carbon sequestration and have a lower cost of capital and operating expenses compared to conventional WWTP, while also emitting lower GHG emissions. A case study is presented for two types of system in which one is actual operating conventional WWTP in Malaysia design and operate at 60m3/d and a hybrid CW of equivalent treatment capability and capacity. The case study found that GHG emissions from a conventional WWTP were approximately 3.75 times higher than the hybrid CW system with the same treatment capacity. For a small capacity WWTP at 60m3 per day, converting the treatment system from conventional WWTP to CW will reduce approximately 45.7t CO2 eq per year based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) calculation. The conventional WWTP consumed much higher power especially from the air blower compared to CW where limited number of equipment is required. The additional carbon sink for CW from carbon sequestration from plant, soil decomposition and sediment has not been quantified in the LCA calculation. Hence, it is expected the actual CO2 eq emission for CW is much lesser than the conventional WWTP. With all the benefit identified and the proven success case in several places, the adoption of CW as an industrial WWTP should be widely promoted as the replacement of conventional WWTP for sustainable future.","PeriodicalId":153269,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructed Wetland as an Alternative to Conventional Industrial Wastewater Treatment to Promote Carbon Sequestration for Sustainable Future\",\"authors\":\"Sew Keng Tan, M. M. M. Shah, S. Sufian, Pui Vun Chai\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22913-ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Constructed wetlands (CW) are man-made systems that mimic the natural wetlands. They can be used for various purposes, including wastewater treatment, stormwater management, and carbon sequestration. Wetlands naturally absorb and store carbon from the atmosphere, and CW can replicate this process by using plants and microorganisms to remove and store carbon from the water. Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) use more energy and contribute to carbon emissions, so many industries are looking for ways to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. While CW have been widely used for municipal and sewage treatment, their use as an alternative or supplement to industrial wastewater treatment, particularly in the oil and gas and petrochemical industries, is limited. However, CW have the potential to promote carbon sequestration and have a lower cost of capital and operating expenses compared to conventional WWTP, while also emitting lower GHG emissions. A case study is presented for two types of system in which one is actual operating conventional WWTP in Malaysia design and operate at 60m3/d and a hybrid CW of equivalent treatment capability and capacity. The case study found that GHG emissions from a conventional WWTP were approximately 3.75 times higher than the hybrid CW system with the same treatment capacity. For a small capacity WWTP at 60m3 per day, converting the treatment system from conventional WWTP to CW will reduce approximately 45.7t CO2 eq per year based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) calculation. The conventional WWTP consumed much higher power especially from the air blower compared to CW where limited number of equipment is required. The additional carbon sink for CW from carbon sequestration from plant, soil decomposition and sediment has not been quantified in the LCA calculation. Hence, it is expected the actual CO2 eq emission for CW is much lesser than the conventional WWTP. With all the benefit identified and the proven success case in several places, the adoption of CW as an industrial WWTP should be widely promoted as the replacement of conventional WWTP for sustainable future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22913-ea\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22913-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工湿地(CW)是模拟自然湿地的人工系统。它们可以用于各种目的,包括废水处理、雨水管理和碳封存。湿地自然地从大气中吸收和储存碳,而CW可以通过利用植物和微生物从水中去除和储存碳来复制这一过程。传统的污水处理厂(WWTP)使用更多的能源并导致碳排放,因此许多行业正在寻找减少温室气体(GHG)排放的方法。虽然连续水已广泛用于城市和污水处理,但作为工业废水处理的替代或补充,特别是在石油、天然气和石化行业,其用途有限。然而,与传统的污水处理厂相比,连续污水处理厂具有促进碳固存的潜力,并且具有更低的资本成本和运营费用,同时也排放更少的温室气体。介绍了两种系统的案例研究,其中一种是马来西亚实际运行的常规污水处理厂设计,运行速度为60m3/d,另一种是具有同等处理能力和容量的混合连续污水处理厂。案例研究发现,在处理能力相同的情况下,传统污水处理厂的温室气体排放量约为混合连续污水处理系统的3.75倍。对于每天60立方米的小容量污水处理厂,根据生命周期评估(LCA)计算,将处理系统从传统污水处理厂转换为连续污水处理厂,每年将减少约45.7吨二氧化碳当量。与需要有限数量设备的连续化粪池相比,传统的污水处理厂消耗的功率要高得多,尤其是鼓风机。来自植物碳固存、土壤分解和沉积物的额外碳汇在LCA计算中尚未被量化。因此,预计连续污水处理的实际CO2当量排放量远低于常规污水处理。鉴于已确定的所有好处和在多个地方的成功案例,应广泛推广采用污水处理系统作为工业污水处理系统,以取代传统的污水处理系统,以实现可持续发展的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constructed Wetland as an Alternative to Conventional Industrial Wastewater Treatment to Promote Carbon Sequestration for Sustainable Future
Constructed wetlands (CW) are man-made systems that mimic the natural wetlands. They can be used for various purposes, including wastewater treatment, stormwater management, and carbon sequestration. Wetlands naturally absorb and store carbon from the atmosphere, and CW can replicate this process by using plants and microorganisms to remove and store carbon from the water. Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) use more energy and contribute to carbon emissions, so many industries are looking for ways to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. While CW have been widely used for municipal and sewage treatment, their use as an alternative or supplement to industrial wastewater treatment, particularly in the oil and gas and petrochemical industries, is limited. However, CW have the potential to promote carbon sequestration and have a lower cost of capital and operating expenses compared to conventional WWTP, while also emitting lower GHG emissions. A case study is presented for two types of system in which one is actual operating conventional WWTP in Malaysia design and operate at 60m3/d and a hybrid CW of equivalent treatment capability and capacity. The case study found that GHG emissions from a conventional WWTP were approximately 3.75 times higher than the hybrid CW system with the same treatment capacity. For a small capacity WWTP at 60m3 per day, converting the treatment system from conventional WWTP to CW will reduce approximately 45.7t CO2 eq per year based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) calculation. The conventional WWTP consumed much higher power especially from the air blower compared to CW where limited number of equipment is required. The additional carbon sink for CW from carbon sequestration from plant, soil decomposition and sediment has not been quantified in the LCA calculation. Hence, it is expected the actual CO2 eq emission for CW is much lesser than the conventional WWTP. With all the benefit identified and the proven success case in several places, the adoption of CW as an industrial WWTP should be widely promoted as the replacement of conventional WWTP for sustainable future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancement of Open Hole Gravel Pack and Zonal Isolation with Selective Intelligent Completion in Deepwater Malaysia Reaching Beyond the Limit, the Furthest Step Out S Shape Wells in Deep Gas Well Project Application and Performance Monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection System Malaysia's First Use of Subsea Release Plug System for Dual Barrier Offline Cementing (DBOC) Across Hydrocarbon Section Helps Streamline Activities Drilling Weak Formations in Rumaila Field in Southern Iraq — Modelling Shear Failure Using Numerical Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1