损害救济制度的目的与损害概念研究

Ohsang Kwon
{"title":"损害救济制度的目的与损害概念研究","authors":"Ohsang Kwon","doi":"10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the various issues regarding the damage remedy system, the purpose and concept of the damage are the most fundamental ones that suggest a direction for how we should look at the damage in specific cases. Above all, regarding the purpose of the damage remedy system, the original one was the corrective justice, but in the contemporary welfare society, the distributive justice is being more and more emphasized. Our Civil Code pursues a fair and valid sharing of damage, which implies that the code accepts both corrective and distributive justices. \nRegarding the concept of damage, the Roman law did not clearly distinguish the contractual damage from the that of tort, but established the concept that the damage would involve violation and gain, and such concept would form the basis of the Medieval law and would also form the background of the damage in the contemporary civil laws. This study would review the concepts of the damage in German and French civil codes and then, discuss their concept in the US Tort. Specifically, this study examines the core disputes regarding the concept of the damage to better understand the core discussions of such concepts related with the concept of the damage as differential amount theory, normative concept of damage and foreseeability in an effort to make clear the discussions regarding the scope of the damage in Article 393 of our Civil Code. In particular, domestic majority of theories and judicial precedents adopt the Proximate casual relation theory as a criterion for decision on the scope of the damage, but Article 393 itself should function as criteria for decision on the scope of the damage. Hence, as the Paragraph 2 of Article 393 stipulates, it is judged that the foreseeability shall be the criteria for decision on the special damage, and that beside the principles of interest balancing and the foreseeability, other specific validity such as purpose of the norm should be considered for a fair distribution of the damage.","PeriodicalId":398961,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Purpose of the Damage Remedy System and the Concept of the Damage\",\"authors\":\"Ohsang Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the various issues regarding the damage remedy system, the purpose and concept of the damage are the most fundamental ones that suggest a direction for how we should look at the damage in specific cases. Above all, regarding the purpose of the damage remedy system, the original one was the corrective justice, but in the contemporary welfare society, the distributive justice is being more and more emphasized. Our Civil Code pursues a fair and valid sharing of damage, which implies that the code accepts both corrective and distributive justices. \\nRegarding the concept of damage, the Roman law did not clearly distinguish the contractual damage from the that of tort, but established the concept that the damage would involve violation and gain, and such concept would form the basis of the Medieval law and would also form the background of the damage in the contemporary civil laws. This study would review the concepts of the damage in German and French civil codes and then, discuss their concept in the US Tort. Specifically, this study examines the core disputes regarding the concept of the damage to better understand the core discussions of such concepts related with the concept of the damage as differential amount theory, normative concept of damage and foreseeability in an effort to make clear the discussions regarding the scope of the damage in Article 393 of our Civil Code. In particular, domestic majority of theories and judicial precedents adopt the Proximate casual relation theory as a criterion for decision on the scope of the damage, but Article 393 itself should function as criteria for decision on the scope of the damage. Hence, as the Paragraph 2 of Article 393 stipulates, it is judged that the foreseeability shall be the criteria for decision on the special damage, and that beside the principles of interest balancing and the foreseeability, other specific validity such as purpose of the norm should be considered for a fair distribution of the damage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institute of Legal Myongji University\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institute of Legal Myongji University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2022.21.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在损害赔偿制度的诸多问题中,损害赔偿的目的和概念是最根本的问题,它为我们在具体案件中如何看待损害赔偿指明了方向。首先,就损害赔偿制度的目的而言,最初的目的是矫正正义,但在当代福利社会,分配正义越来越受到重视。我国民法典追求公平有效的损害分担,这意味着民法典既接受纠正正义,也接受分配正义。在损害概念上,罗马法并没有明确区分合同损害与侵权损害,而是确立了损害涉及违约和获利的概念,这一概念构成了中世纪法的基础,也构成了当代民法损害的背景。本文首先回顾了德国民法典和法国民法典中损害赔偿的概念,然后讨论了美国侵权法中损害赔偿的概念。具体而言,本文通过对损害赔偿概念的核心争议进行梳理,以更好地理解与损害赔偿概念相关的差额数额理论、损害赔偿的规范性概念和可预见性等概念的核心讨论,从而厘清我国民法典第393条关于损害赔偿范围的讨论。特别是国内多数理论和司法判例都采用近似因果关系理论作为判断损害范围的标准,但第393条本身应该作为判断损害范围的标准。因此,我国《民法通则》第393条第2款规定,应当以可预见性作为认定特殊损害的标准,除利益平衡原则和可预见性原则外,还应当考虑规范目的等其他具体效力,以实现损害的公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study on the Purpose of the Damage Remedy System and the Concept of the Damage
Among the various issues regarding the damage remedy system, the purpose and concept of the damage are the most fundamental ones that suggest a direction for how we should look at the damage in specific cases. Above all, regarding the purpose of the damage remedy system, the original one was the corrective justice, but in the contemporary welfare society, the distributive justice is being more and more emphasized. Our Civil Code pursues a fair and valid sharing of damage, which implies that the code accepts both corrective and distributive justices. Regarding the concept of damage, the Roman law did not clearly distinguish the contractual damage from the that of tort, but established the concept that the damage would involve violation and gain, and such concept would form the basis of the Medieval law and would also form the background of the damage in the contemporary civil laws. This study would review the concepts of the damage in German and French civil codes and then, discuss their concept in the US Tort. Specifically, this study examines the core disputes regarding the concept of the damage to better understand the core discussions of such concepts related with the concept of the damage as differential amount theory, normative concept of damage and foreseeability in an effort to make clear the discussions regarding the scope of the damage in Article 393 of our Civil Code. In particular, domestic majority of theories and judicial precedents adopt the Proximate casual relation theory as a criterion for decision on the scope of the damage, but Article 393 itself should function as criteria for decision on the scope of the damage. Hence, as the Paragraph 2 of Article 393 stipulates, it is judged that the foreseeability shall be the criteria for decision on the special damage, and that beside the principles of interest balancing and the foreseeability, other specific validity such as purpose of the norm should be considered for a fair distribution of the damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Improvement of the System for Recovering Unjust Enrichment in the Defense Acquisition Program Act A Study on the Legal Protection of Graphic Design on the Metaverse Platform Requirements for the establishment of Obscene Acts by Using Means of Communication under Act On Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Analysis of all Issues Related to the Greenland International Medical Center Case A Study on the Regulation of OTT Mergers under Competition Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1