发展中国家电气化规划的地理空间框架

J. E. Adkins, V. Modi, S. Sherpa, R. Han, Ayse Selin Kocaman, Naichen Zhao, Chris Natali, J. Carbajal
{"title":"发展中国家电气化规划的地理空间框架","authors":"J. E. Adkins, V. Modi, S. Sherpa, R. Han, Ayse Selin Kocaman, Naichen Zhao, Chris Natali, J. Carbajal","doi":"10.1109/GHTC.2017.8239293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In efforts to achieve universal electricity access, geospatial factors, particularly the distribution of populated places and other electricity demands, are fundamentally important in determining the relative costs of competing grid, mini-grid or home system electrification options. Research presented here goes beyond broad metrics such as population density to instead consider patterns of aggregation and distances between communities to produce geographically specific cost estimates for medium and low voltage line. This analysis considers these factors at two geographic scales. First, it presents localized investigations of several rural locations in sub-Saharan Africa, at the scale of tens of kilometers, using household-level location data from GPS surveying and high-resolution satellite imagery. This work resulted in broad classification of village landscapes and suggested cost-effective electrification with different technologies depending upon inter-community and inter-household distances as proxies for medium and low voltage line lengths. Second, the analysis draws upon larger scale planning studies and data, at the scale of thousands of kilometers, in developing countries targeting electricity access for millions or tens of millions of unserved households, relying on coarser geospatial population datasets. A key observation of this analysis relates to the manner in which electrification planning can respond to cost tradeoffs between grid and non-grid electrification options in areas with different settlement patterns.","PeriodicalId":248924,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A geospatial framework for electrification planning in developing countries\",\"authors\":\"J. E. Adkins, V. Modi, S. Sherpa, R. Han, Ayse Selin Kocaman, Naichen Zhao, Chris Natali, J. Carbajal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GHTC.2017.8239293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In efforts to achieve universal electricity access, geospatial factors, particularly the distribution of populated places and other electricity demands, are fundamentally important in determining the relative costs of competing grid, mini-grid or home system electrification options. Research presented here goes beyond broad metrics such as population density to instead consider patterns of aggregation and distances between communities to produce geographically specific cost estimates for medium and low voltage line. This analysis considers these factors at two geographic scales. First, it presents localized investigations of several rural locations in sub-Saharan Africa, at the scale of tens of kilometers, using household-level location data from GPS surveying and high-resolution satellite imagery. This work resulted in broad classification of village landscapes and suggested cost-effective electrification with different technologies depending upon inter-community and inter-household distances as proxies for medium and low voltage line lengths. Second, the analysis draws upon larger scale planning studies and data, at the scale of thousands of kilometers, in developing countries targeting electricity access for millions or tens of millions of unserved households, relying on coarser geospatial population datasets. A key observation of this analysis relates to the manner in which electrification planning can respond to cost tradeoffs between grid and non-grid electrification options in areas with different settlement patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2017.8239293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2017.8239293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在实现普遍供电的努力中,地理空间因素,特别是人口稠密地区的分布和其他电力需求,在确定相互竞争的电网、微型电网或家庭系统电气化备选办法的相对成本方面具有根本的重要意义。本文提出的研究超越了人口密度等广泛的指标,而是考虑了聚集模式和社区之间的距离,以产生地理上特定的中低压线路成本估算。本分析在两个地理尺度上考虑了这些因素。首先,它利用来自GPS测量和高分辨率卫星图像的家庭级位置数据,在数十公里的范围内对撒哈拉以南非洲的几个农村地区进行了本地化调查。这项工作对村庄景观进行了广泛的分类,并根据社区间和家庭间的距离作为中低压线路长度的代表,建议采用不同技术进行具有成本效益的电气化。其次,该分析利用了发展中国家数千公里规模的更大规模规划研究和数据,目标是为数百万或数千万未获得电力服务的家庭提供电力,依赖于更粗糙的地理空间人口数据集。这一分析的一个关键观察结果涉及电气化规划如何在具有不同定居模式的地区响应电网和非电网电气化选择之间的成本权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A geospatial framework for electrification planning in developing countries
In efforts to achieve universal electricity access, geospatial factors, particularly the distribution of populated places and other electricity demands, are fundamentally important in determining the relative costs of competing grid, mini-grid or home system electrification options. Research presented here goes beyond broad metrics such as population density to instead consider patterns of aggregation and distances between communities to produce geographically specific cost estimates for medium and low voltage line. This analysis considers these factors at two geographic scales. First, it presents localized investigations of several rural locations in sub-Saharan Africa, at the scale of tens of kilometers, using household-level location data from GPS surveying and high-resolution satellite imagery. This work resulted in broad classification of village landscapes and suggested cost-effective electrification with different technologies depending upon inter-community and inter-household distances as proxies for medium and low voltage line lengths. Second, the analysis draws upon larger scale planning studies and data, at the scale of thousands of kilometers, in developing countries targeting electricity access for millions or tens of millions of unserved households, relying on coarser geospatial population datasets. A key observation of this analysis relates to the manner in which electrification planning can respond to cost tradeoffs between grid and non-grid electrification options in areas with different settlement patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tablet app for child cognitive assessment in low and middle income countries Analyzing sub-optimal rural microgrids and methods for improving the system capacity and demand factors: Filibaba microgrid case study examined A global market assessment methodology for small wind in the developing world Using smart power management control to maximize energy utilization and reliability within a microgrid of interconnected solar home systems Use of cough sounds for diagnosis and screening of pulmonary disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1