采用环保产品申报进行绿色公共采购和混凝土路面生命周期评估

M. Rangelov, H. Dylla, N. Sivaneswaran
{"title":"采用环保产品申报进行绿色公共采购和混凝土路面生命周期评估","authors":"M. Rangelov, H. Dylla, N. Sivaneswaran","doi":"10.33593/8ziapl8i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental impacts of concrete production have been evaluated for more than a decade. As a result, a national program for environmental product declarations (EPDs) of concrete has been initiated. The main objective of this paper is to analyze concrete EPDs produced to date and evaluate their applicability for green public procurement (GPP) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete pavements. EPDs provide transparent and verified quantification of environmental impacts, calculated per predetermined guidelines, known as Product Category Rules (PCRs). PCRs for concrete were developed through involvement of stakeholders from the building industry; therefore, these PCRs may not be fully applicable to paving concrete. The analysis included over 70 published EPDs and revealed that there are marked variations in underlying data sources and data quality, which hinders comparability of EPDs and use of EPDs for benchmarking. Concrete EPDs were created primarily using proprietary data sources suitable for the private sector. However, in the public sector, the use of proprietary data may be cost-prohibitive for agencies, disable transparency, and present the impediment to wider GPP and LCA adoption. To that end, reliable public datasets offer more promise for the development of paving concrete EPD. This study also compares concrete PCR to that of other paving materials (cement, aggregate, asphalt), all of which were created with no overarching entity. Accordingly, the potential options for harmonization and synergetic use of these EPDs in GPP and pavement LCA are also investigated.","PeriodicalId":265129,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using environmental product declarations for green public procurement and life cycle assessment of concrete pavements\",\"authors\":\"M. Rangelov, H. Dylla, N. Sivaneswaran\",\"doi\":\"10.33593/8ziapl8i\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental impacts of concrete production have been evaluated for more than a decade. As a result, a national program for environmental product declarations (EPDs) of concrete has been initiated. The main objective of this paper is to analyze concrete EPDs produced to date and evaluate their applicability for green public procurement (GPP) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete pavements. EPDs provide transparent and verified quantification of environmental impacts, calculated per predetermined guidelines, known as Product Category Rules (PCRs). PCRs for concrete were developed through involvement of stakeholders from the building industry; therefore, these PCRs may not be fully applicable to paving concrete. The analysis included over 70 published EPDs and revealed that there are marked variations in underlying data sources and data quality, which hinders comparability of EPDs and use of EPDs for benchmarking. Concrete EPDs were created primarily using proprietary data sources suitable for the private sector. However, in the public sector, the use of proprietary data may be cost-prohibitive for agencies, disable transparency, and present the impediment to wider GPP and LCA adoption. To that end, reliable public datasets offer more promise for the development of paving concrete EPD. This study also compares concrete PCR to that of other paving materials (cement, aggregate, asphalt), all of which were created with no overarching entity. Accordingly, the potential options for harmonization and synergetic use of these EPDs in GPP and pavement LCA are also investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33593/8ziapl8i\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33593/8ziapl8i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土生产对环境的影响已经进行了十多年的评估。因此,一项关于混凝土环境产品申报(EPDs)的国家计划已经启动。本文的主要目的是分析迄今为止生产的混凝土环境保护计划,并评估其在绿色公共采购(GPP)和混凝土路面生命周期评估(LCA)中的适用性。环境保护计划提供透明和经过验证的环境影响量化,根据预先确定的准则计算,称为产品类别规则(pcr)。混凝土的聚合酶链反应是在建筑行业利益相关者的参与下开发的;因此,这些聚合聚合酶可能不完全适用于铺装混凝土。该分析包括超过70份已发表的环境保护文件,并显示在基础数据源和数据质量方面存在明显差异,这妨碍了环境保护文件的可比性和使用环境保护文件作为基准。具体的epd主要是使用适合私营部门的专有数据源创建的。然而,在公共部门,使用专有数据对机构来说可能成本过高,不透明,并阻碍了更广泛的GPP和LCA的采用。为此,可靠的公共数据集为铺装混凝土环境保护的发展提供了更多的希望。本研究还将混凝土PCR与其他铺路材料(水泥、骨料、沥青)进行了比较,这些材料都是在没有总体实体的情况下创建的。因此,对这些EPDs在GPP和路面LCA中的协调和协同使用的潜在选择也进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using environmental product declarations for green public procurement and life cycle assessment of concrete pavements
Environmental impacts of concrete production have been evaluated for more than a decade. As a result, a national program for environmental product declarations (EPDs) of concrete has been initiated. The main objective of this paper is to analyze concrete EPDs produced to date and evaluate their applicability for green public procurement (GPP) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete pavements. EPDs provide transparent and verified quantification of environmental impacts, calculated per predetermined guidelines, known as Product Category Rules (PCRs). PCRs for concrete were developed through involvement of stakeholders from the building industry; therefore, these PCRs may not be fully applicable to paving concrete. The analysis included over 70 published EPDs and revealed that there are marked variations in underlying data sources and data quality, which hinders comparability of EPDs and use of EPDs for benchmarking. Concrete EPDs were created primarily using proprietary data sources suitable for the private sector. However, in the public sector, the use of proprietary data may be cost-prohibitive for agencies, disable transparency, and present the impediment to wider GPP and LCA adoption. To that end, reliable public datasets offer more promise for the development of paving concrete EPD. This study also compares concrete PCR to that of other paving materials (cement, aggregate, asphalt), all of which were created with no overarching entity. Accordingly, the potential options for harmonization and synergetic use of these EPDs in GPP and pavement LCA are also investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity Analysis of FAARFIELD Rigid Airport Pavement Thickness Determination Guidance for Increasing the Use of Recycled Concrete Pavement Materials Performance Summary Of Precast Concrete Inlay Panel Trial In Ontario Validation Of A New Method For Determining The Remaining Service Life Of Rigid Pavements Impacts Of Flooding On Concrete Pavement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1