最优形状设计问题的数值方法比较

Manfred Laumen
{"title":"最优形状设计问题的数值方法比较","authors":"Manfred Laumen","doi":"10.1080/10556789908805726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several optimal shape design problems are defined as a minimization problem with an equality constraint that is given by a boundary value problem. The mapping method transforms this to a specific control problem on a fixed domain. Discretizing this optimal control problem normally leads to a large scale optimization formulation where the corresponding solution methods are characterized by the requirement of solving many boundary value problems. In spite of this interesting numerical challenge, until now less research has been done on comparing different numerical optimization approaches including second order methods for optimal shape design problems. In this paper, Newton's and several variants of quasi-Newton methods are derived for a class of optimal shape design problems and compared to the commonly used gradient method. The pros and cons of these methods plus their nested iteration versions are discussed in detail. Various numerical experiences underline the importance of choosing the right optimizat...","PeriodicalId":142744,"journal":{"name":"Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Numerical Methods for Optimal Shape Design Problems\",\"authors\":\"Manfred Laumen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10556789908805726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several optimal shape design problems are defined as a minimization problem with an equality constraint that is given by a boundary value problem. The mapping method transforms this to a specific control problem on a fixed domain. Discretizing this optimal control problem normally leads to a large scale optimization formulation where the corresponding solution methods are characterized by the requirement of solving many boundary value problems. In spite of this interesting numerical challenge, until now less research has been done on comparing different numerical optimization approaches including second order methods for optimal shape design problems. In this paper, Newton's and several variants of quasi-Newton methods are derived for a class of optimal shape design problems and compared to the commonly used gradient method. The pros and cons of these methods plus their nested iteration versions are discussed in detail. Various numerical experiences underline the importance of choosing the right optimizat...\",\"PeriodicalId\":142744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10556789908805726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10556789908805726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

将若干最优形状设计问题定义为带等式约束的最小化问题,该问题由边值问题给出。映射方法将其转换为固定域上的特定控制问题。将这一最优控制问题离散化通常会导致大规模的优化公式,而相应的求解方法需要求解许多边值问题。尽管这是一个有趣的数值挑战,但到目前为止,比较不同数值优化方法的研究还很少,包括最优形状设计问题的二阶方法。本文针对一类最优形状设计问题,导出了牛顿法和拟牛顿法的几种变体,并与常用的梯度法进行了比较。详细讨论了这些方法及其嵌套迭代版本的优缺点。各种数值经验强调了选择正确优化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Numerical Methods for Optimal Shape Design Problems
Several optimal shape design problems are defined as a minimization problem with an equality constraint that is given by a boundary value problem. The mapping method transforms this to a specific control problem on a fixed domain. Discretizing this optimal control problem normally leads to a large scale optimization formulation where the corresponding solution methods are characterized by the requirement of solving many boundary value problems. In spite of this interesting numerical challenge, until now less research has been done on comparing different numerical optimization approaches including second order methods for optimal shape design problems. In this paper, Newton's and several variants of quasi-Newton methods are derived for a class of optimal shape design problems and compared to the commonly used gradient method. The pros and cons of these methods plus their nested iteration versions are discussed in detail. Various numerical experiences underline the importance of choosing the right optimizat...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantization for Probability Measures in the Prohorov Metric An Efficient Method for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Polynomial Constants Are Decidable Speeding up symbolic model checking by accelerating dynamic variable reordering Nonuniform Grids for Reduced Basis Design of Low Order Feedback Controllers for Nonlinear Continuous Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1