叔本华对动物福利运动的贡献

Natalia Yu. Chepeleva
{"title":"叔本华对动物福利运动的贡献","authors":"Natalia Yu. Chepeleva","doi":"10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-2-74-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the contribution made by Schopenhauer to the development of the move­ment for the protection of animals. The author reconstructs some details of Schopenhauer’s interaction with the founder of the first German societies for the protection of animals Ignaz Perner. The article discusses the criticism of the Cartesian worldview and Christian morality proposed by Schopenhauer, with which Schopenhauer associates the lawlessness of animals that was relevant for his era. The article critically reconstructs some of Schopenhauer’s judg­ments regarding the reflection of the status of animals in language, in the Bible, and in legis­lation. The author compares the status of animals in Schopenhauer’s philosophy and in classi­cal German philosophy on the example of Kant and Hegel. The article discusses the criticism of Kant presented by Schopenhauer for “idolatry of reason”, on the basis of which Kant, fol­lowing Descartes and Christian morality, continues to be in error regarding the existence of an ontological gap between man and animals. The article gives a detailed reconstruction of Schopenhauer’s doctrine of animals, including the idea of the animal kingdom as one of the stages of objectification of will, the interpretation of the aesthetic image of animals and the creative drives of the animals themselves, and the justification for the need for compas­sionate behavior towards animals. The article criticizes the widespread perception of Schopen­hauer as a vegetarian, and provides Schopenhauer’s own arguments about the necessity of eating meat. The article discusses Schopenhauer’s doctrine of animals in the context of modern animal and vegan studies. The article concludes that Schopenhauer was the first European philosopher to offer a popular theoretical justification for the need for an ethical at­titude towards animals, which formed the basis of the animal welfare movement in Germany.","PeriodicalId":360102,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Thought","volume":"99 1-4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schopenhauer’s Contribution to the Animal Welfare Movement\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Yu. Chepeleva\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-2-74-85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the contribution made by Schopenhauer to the development of the move­ment for the protection of animals. The author reconstructs some details of Schopenhauer’s interaction with the founder of the first German societies for the protection of animals Ignaz Perner. The article discusses the criticism of the Cartesian worldview and Christian morality proposed by Schopenhauer, with which Schopenhauer associates the lawlessness of animals that was relevant for his era. The article critically reconstructs some of Schopenhauer’s judg­ments regarding the reflection of the status of animals in language, in the Bible, and in legis­lation. The author compares the status of animals in Schopenhauer’s philosophy and in classi­cal German philosophy on the example of Kant and Hegel. The article discusses the criticism of Kant presented by Schopenhauer for “idolatry of reason”, on the basis of which Kant, fol­lowing Descartes and Christian morality, continues to be in error regarding the existence of an ontological gap between man and animals. The article gives a detailed reconstruction of Schopenhauer’s doctrine of animals, including the idea of the animal kingdom as one of the stages of objectification of will, the interpretation of the aesthetic image of animals and the creative drives of the animals themselves, and the justification for the need for compas­sionate behavior towards animals. The article criticizes the widespread perception of Schopen­hauer as a vegetarian, and provides Schopenhauer’s own arguments about the necessity of eating meat. The article discusses Schopenhauer’s doctrine of animals in the context of modern animal and vegan studies. The article concludes that Schopenhauer was the first European philosopher to offer a popular theoretical justification for the need for an ethical at­titude towards animals, which formed the basis of the animal welfare movement in Germany.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Thought\",\"volume\":\"99 1-4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-2-74-85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-2-74-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了叔本华对动物保护运动发展的贡献。作者重建了叔本华与德国第一个动物保护协会的创始人伊格纳兹·佩纳互动的一些细节。本文讨论了叔本华对笛卡尔世界观和基督教道德的批判,叔本华将与他的时代相关的动物无法无天联系在一起。本文批判性地重构了叔本华关于动物在语言、圣经和立法中地位的反映的一些判断。作者以康德和黑格尔为例,比较了动物在叔本华哲学和德国古典哲学中的地位。本文讨论了叔本华对康德的“理性偶像崇拜”批评,在此基础上,继笛卡尔和基督教道德之后,康德继续错误地认为人与动物之间存在本体论上的鸿沟。本文对叔本华的动物学说进行了详细的重建,包括将动物王国作为意志客观化的一个阶段的观点,对动物的审美形象和动物本身的创造动力的解释,以及对动物需要同情行为的理由。这篇文章批评了叔本华作为素食者的普遍看法,并提供了叔本华自己关于吃肉必要性的论点。本文在现代动物和纯素研究的背景下讨论叔本华的动物学说。这篇文章的结论是叔本华是第一个为对待动物的道德态度的必要性提供流行理论依据的欧洲哲学家,这构成了德国动物福利运动的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Schopenhauer’s Contribution to the Animal Welfare Movement
The article analyzes the contribution made by Schopenhauer to the development of the move­ment for the protection of animals. The author reconstructs some details of Schopenhauer’s interaction with the founder of the first German societies for the protection of animals Ignaz Perner. The article discusses the criticism of the Cartesian worldview and Christian morality proposed by Schopenhauer, with which Schopenhauer associates the lawlessness of animals that was relevant for his era. The article critically reconstructs some of Schopenhauer’s judg­ments regarding the reflection of the status of animals in language, in the Bible, and in legis­lation. The author compares the status of animals in Schopenhauer’s philosophy and in classi­cal German philosophy on the example of Kant and Hegel. The article discusses the criticism of Kant presented by Schopenhauer for “idolatry of reason”, on the basis of which Kant, fol­lowing Descartes and Christian morality, continues to be in error regarding the existence of an ontological gap between man and animals. The article gives a detailed reconstruction of Schopenhauer’s doctrine of animals, including the idea of the animal kingdom as one of the stages of objectification of will, the interpretation of the aesthetic image of animals and the creative drives of the animals themselves, and the justification for the need for compas­sionate behavior towards animals. The article criticizes the widespread perception of Schopen­hauer as a vegetarian, and provides Schopenhauer’s own arguments about the necessity of eating meat. The article discusses Schopenhauer’s doctrine of animals in the context of modern animal and vegan studies. The article concludes that Schopenhauer was the first European philosopher to offer a popular theoretical justification for the need for an ethical at­titude towards animals, which formed the basis of the animal welfare movement in Germany.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Ethical, Moral and Pragmatic Justification of Political Decisions The Idea of Just War in the Western Ethical Tradition (from Antiquity to the Mid-18th Century) Proceedings of a Discussion on the Paper “Moral Philosophy and Ethics”, by Abduslam Guseynov, a Member of Russian Academy of Sciences Aristotle in the Moral Philosophy of the Early Modern Period (Treatise of H. Grotius «On the Law of War and Peace») Jus Post Bellum in Just War Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1