造血生长因子。

Hematologic pathology Pub Date : 1992-01-01
M E Williams, P J Quesenberry
{"title":"造血生长因子。","authors":"M E Williams,&nbsp;P J Quesenberry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in our understanding of the hemolymphopoietic growth factors has revolutionized knowledge of blood cell development, the immune system, and of tumor cell biology. However, the rapid translation of these insights from basic research to the clinic has been perhaps the most dramatic part of the story. Commercially available erythropoietin has become established for the treatment of the anemia of end-stage renal disease, and promises to be of value in the supportive care of patients with cancer and perhaps other chronic diseases. It likely will be increasingly utilized for enhancing autologous blood donation and for perioperative management. Both GM-CSF and G-CSF only recently released by the FDA for specific clinical indications, though there are a variety of potential applications (Table 12). It is clear that G-CSF is the therapy of choice for most neutropenias and that both agents have effects in diminishing the myelotoxicity and mucositis seen after aggressive chemoradiotherapy. However, it is important to note that as yet there is no evidence that the use of either G-CSF or GM-CSF has resulted in increased cure rates or, in fact, increased survival in patients with various malignancies. It would appear that both G-CSF and GM-CSF will, in fact, allow dose escalation and/or diminished toxicity of various chemotherapeutic regimens. However, there are important considerations in the overall place of these cytokines with regard to treatment of human disease. A major goal in the therapy of patients with malignancy is obviously prolongation of life and cure. If, in fact, escalation of doses of chemotherapeutic agents does not result in increased tumor responses or cures then the use of these growth factors will have a relatively trivial impact on the care of cancer patients. In addition, the disturbing observations of receptors for these growth factors on various tumor cell lines and of varying degrees of in vitro tumor cell proliferative responses raises the possibility that in some situations they may actually stimulate tumor growth. This is an unknown which has not been adequately evaluated in any clinical study to date and which may vary from tumor to tumor. For example, if these cytokines increase tumor growth rate by 20-30% (an effect which would probably not be detected in the clinical studies to date) while allowing an escalation of chemotherapy doses it is possible that there would be no significant beneficial effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77160,"journal":{"name":"Hematologic pathology","volume":"6 3","pages":"105-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hematopoietic growth factors.\",\"authors\":\"M E Williams,&nbsp;P J Quesenberry\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent advances in our understanding of the hemolymphopoietic growth factors has revolutionized knowledge of blood cell development, the immune system, and of tumor cell biology. However, the rapid translation of these insights from basic research to the clinic has been perhaps the most dramatic part of the story. Commercially available erythropoietin has become established for the treatment of the anemia of end-stage renal disease, and promises to be of value in the supportive care of patients with cancer and perhaps other chronic diseases. It likely will be increasingly utilized for enhancing autologous blood donation and for perioperative management. Both GM-CSF and G-CSF only recently released by the FDA for specific clinical indications, though there are a variety of potential applications (Table 12). It is clear that G-CSF is the therapy of choice for most neutropenias and that both agents have effects in diminishing the myelotoxicity and mucositis seen after aggressive chemoradiotherapy. However, it is important to note that as yet there is no evidence that the use of either G-CSF or GM-CSF has resulted in increased cure rates or, in fact, increased survival in patients with various malignancies. It would appear that both G-CSF and GM-CSF will, in fact, allow dose escalation and/or diminished toxicity of various chemotherapeutic regimens. However, there are important considerations in the overall place of these cytokines with regard to treatment of human disease. A major goal in the therapy of patients with malignancy is obviously prolongation of life and cure. If, in fact, escalation of doses of chemotherapeutic agents does not result in increased tumor responses or cures then the use of these growth factors will have a relatively trivial impact on the care of cancer patients. In addition, the disturbing observations of receptors for these growth factors on various tumor cell lines and of varying degrees of in vitro tumor cell proliferative responses raises the possibility that in some situations they may actually stimulate tumor growth. This is an unknown which has not been adequately evaluated in any clinical study to date and which may vary from tumor to tumor. For example, if these cytokines increase tumor growth rate by 20-30% (an effect which would probably not be detected in the clinical studies to date) while allowing an escalation of chemotherapy doses it is possible that there would be no significant beneficial effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematologic pathology\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"105-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematologic pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematologic pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近我们对造血生长因子的理解取得了进展,这使我们对血细胞发育、免疫系统和肿瘤细胞生物学的认识发生了革命性的变化。然而,这些见解从基础研究到临床的快速转化可能是这个故事中最引人注目的部分。市售促红细胞生成素已被确定用于治疗终末期肾脏疾病的贫血,并有望在癌症和其他慢性疾病患者的支持性护理中发挥价值。它可能会越来越多地用于加强自体献血和围手术期管理。GM-CSF和G-CSF最近才被FDA发布用于特定的临床适应症,尽管有多种潜在的应用(表12)。很明显,G-CSF是大多数中性粒细胞减少症的治疗选择,两种药物都有减少积极放化疗后出现的骨髓毒性和粘膜炎的作用。然而,值得注意的是,目前还没有证据表明G-CSF或GM-CSF的使用提高了治愈率,或者实际上提高了各种恶性肿瘤患者的生存率。事实上,G-CSF和GM-CSF似乎都可以增加剂量和/或降低各种化疗方案的毒性。然而,在这些细胞因子在人类疾病治疗方面的总体地位有重要的考虑。恶性肿瘤患者治疗的一个主要目标显然是延长生命和治愈。事实上,如果增加化疗药物的剂量不能增加肿瘤反应或治愈,那么这些生长因子的使用对癌症患者的护理将产生相对微不足道的影响。此外,这些生长因子受体在各种肿瘤细胞系和不同程度的体外肿瘤细胞增殖反应上的令人不安的观察,提出了在某些情况下它们实际上可能刺激肿瘤生长的可能性。这是一个未知因素,迄今为止尚未在任何临床研究中得到充分评估,并且可能因肿瘤而异。例如,如果这些细胞因子使肿瘤生长速度增加20-30%(迄今为止在临床研究中可能没有检测到这种效应),同时允许化疗剂量的增加,则可能没有显著的有益效果。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hematopoietic growth factors.

Recent advances in our understanding of the hemolymphopoietic growth factors has revolutionized knowledge of blood cell development, the immune system, and of tumor cell biology. However, the rapid translation of these insights from basic research to the clinic has been perhaps the most dramatic part of the story. Commercially available erythropoietin has become established for the treatment of the anemia of end-stage renal disease, and promises to be of value in the supportive care of patients with cancer and perhaps other chronic diseases. It likely will be increasingly utilized for enhancing autologous blood donation and for perioperative management. Both GM-CSF and G-CSF only recently released by the FDA for specific clinical indications, though there are a variety of potential applications (Table 12). It is clear that G-CSF is the therapy of choice for most neutropenias and that both agents have effects in diminishing the myelotoxicity and mucositis seen after aggressive chemoradiotherapy. However, it is important to note that as yet there is no evidence that the use of either G-CSF or GM-CSF has resulted in increased cure rates or, in fact, increased survival in patients with various malignancies. It would appear that both G-CSF and GM-CSF will, in fact, allow dose escalation and/or diminished toxicity of various chemotherapeutic regimens. However, there are important considerations in the overall place of these cytokines with regard to treatment of human disease. A major goal in the therapy of patients with malignancy is obviously prolongation of life and cure. If, in fact, escalation of doses of chemotherapeutic agents does not result in increased tumor responses or cures then the use of these growth factors will have a relatively trivial impact on the care of cancer patients. In addition, the disturbing observations of receptors for these growth factors on various tumor cell lines and of varying degrees of in vitro tumor cell proliferative responses raises the possibility that in some situations they may actually stimulate tumor growth. This is an unknown which has not been adequately evaluated in any clinical study to date and which may vary from tumor to tumor. For example, if these cytokines increase tumor growth rate by 20-30% (an effect which would probably not be detected in the clinical studies to date) while allowing an escalation of chemotherapy doses it is possible that there would be no significant beneficial effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topobiology in hematopoiesis. Progress in antisense therapeutics. Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic progenitor cells in human cord blood: an effect enhanced by cord blood serum. Lineage identification of acute leukemias: relevance of immunologic and ultrastructural techniques. Bone marrow morphology during induction phase of therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1