电子政务成熟度模型述评:它们是否仍然适用?

Z. Patergiannaki, Y. Pollalis
{"title":"电子政务成熟度模型述评:它们是否仍然适用?","authors":"Z. Patergiannaki, Y. Pollalis","doi":"10.12681/jpentai.30872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past, a number of methodologies and approaches have been created to evaluate the development of e-Government and the public sector's digital transformation. Numerous e-Government maturity models have been created to close this gap. The variety of models, though, has come under criticism from several academics. The purpose of this research is to examine whether e-Government maturity models can still be regarded as relevant through the examination of 39 e-Government maturity models that have been established throughout the year. The results indicate that due to the numerous internal and external relevant inflectional factors that have not been taken into consideration by the models under study, e-Government maturity models have a limited ability to represent the growth of e-Government.","PeriodicalId":436908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI","volume":"23 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of the e-Government Maturity Models: Are They Still Relevant?\",\"authors\":\"Z. Patergiannaki, Y. Pollalis\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/jpentai.30872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past, a number of methodologies and approaches have been created to evaluate the development of e-Government and the public sector's digital transformation. Numerous e-Government maturity models have been created to close this gap. The variety of models, though, has come under criticism from several academics. The purpose of this research is to examine whether e-Government maturity models can still be regarded as relevant through the examination of 39 e-Government maturity models that have been established throughout the year. The results indicate that due to the numerous internal and external relevant inflectional factors that have not been taken into consideration by the models under study, e-Government maturity models have a limited ability to represent the growth of e-Government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI\",\"volume\":\"23 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/jpentai.30872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/jpentai.30872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

过去,已经创建了许多方法和方法来评估电子政务的发展和公共部门的数字化转型。为了缩小这一差距,已经创建了许多电子政务成熟度模型。然而,各种各样的模型受到了一些学者的批评。本研究的目的是通过对全年已建立的39个电子政务成熟度模型的检验,来检验电子政务成熟度模型是否仍然具有相关性。研究结果表明,由于所研究的模型没有考虑到许多内部和外部的相关曲折因素,电子政务成熟度模型对电子政务成长的表征能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Review of the e-Government Maturity Models: Are They Still Relevant?
In the past, a number of methodologies and approaches have been created to evaluate the development of e-Government and the public sector's digital transformation. Numerous e-Government maturity models have been created to close this gap. The variety of models, though, has come under criticism from several academics. The purpose of this research is to examine whether e-Government maturity models can still be regarded as relevant through the examination of 39 e-Government maturity models that have been established throughout the year. The results indicate that due to the numerous internal and external relevant inflectional factors that have not been taken into consideration by the models under study, e-Government maturity models have a limited ability to represent the growth of e-Government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and Theology: Can Different Doctrines Have Different Outcomes? “Vaccine? No, thank you!” Social Media, Right-Wing Political Orientation and COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy: The Case of Pieria, Greece Transforming Gambling Harm Reduction in Youth: Leveraging AI Language Models for Personalized Intervention and Prevention Artificial Intelligence and its Impact in International Relations Tourism in Rural Areas and Information and Communications Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1