{"title":"Longitudinal patterns in nutrient chemistry and algal chlorophyll below point sources in three northern Ozark streams","authors":"K. Lohman, John R. Jones","doi":"10.1080/03680770.2009.11902376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stream water quality is strongly influenced by nutrient enrichment from both diffuse and point sources (JARVIE et al. 2006). Initial regulatory efforts in the United States to improve water quality largely focused on point sources because they are more easily identified and controlled than diffuse sources. In many locations nutrient enrichment from municipal point sources has been substantially reduced. Nutrient removal is expensive, however, and few small wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) include tertiary treatment to remove nitrogen and phosphorus. Nutrients from WWTP are an important component o f the overallload received by many streams. Diffuse sources can also deliver large nutrient loads to streams (CARPENTER et al. 1998, PERKINS et al. 1998). In rural areas, the impact of agriculturalland use can far exceed that ofpoint sources (CLESCERI et al. 1986), and where agriculture is widespread the consequential effects of nutrient enrichment may be evident across entire river basins. In contrast, point source impacts may be localized but also more intense, and the impairment caused by high nutrient concentrations in stream reaches directly below WWTP can be severe (HAGGARD et al. 2001, MARTI et al. 2004). Our objective was to determine the impact of WWTP effiuent on 3 small Missouri streams by measuring how far downstream nutrient concentrations remained elevated above background levels attributable to diffuse input from agricultural and forested watersheds.","PeriodicalId":404196,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2009.11902376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
河流水质受到扩散源和点源营养物富集的强烈影响(JARVIE et al. 2006)。美国最初改善水质的监管努力主要集中在点源上,因为点源比分散源更容易识别和控制。在许多地方,市政点源的营养物富集已大大减少。然而,去除营养物是昂贵的,很少有小型污水处理厂(WWTP)包括三级处理来去除氮和磷。来自污水处理厂的营养物质是许多河流接收的总负荷的重要组成部分。扩散源也可以向河流输送大量的养分负荷(CARPENTER et al. 1998, PERKINS et al. 1998)。在农村地区,农业用地的影响远远超过点源的影响(CLESCERI et al. 1986),在农业广泛分布的地方,养分富集的后果可能在整个流域都很明显。相比之下,点源影响可能是局部的,但也可能更强烈,而污水处理厂正下方河流中高营养物浓度造成的损害可能很严重(HAGGARD et al. 2001, MARTI et al. 2004)。我们的目标是通过测量由于农业和森林流域的扩散输入而导致的下游营养物质浓度高于背景水平的程度,来确定污水处理厂对密苏里州3条小河流的影响。
Longitudinal patterns in nutrient chemistry and algal chlorophyll below point sources in three northern Ozark streams
Stream water quality is strongly influenced by nutrient enrichment from both diffuse and point sources (JARVIE et al. 2006). Initial regulatory efforts in the United States to improve water quality largely focused on point sources because they are more easily identified and controlled than diffuse sources. In many locations nutrient enrichment from municipal point sources has been substantially reduced. Nutrient removal is expensive, however, and few small wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) include tertiary treatment to remove nitrogen and phosphorus. Nutrients from WWTP are an important component o f the overallload received by many streams. Diffuse sources can also deliver large nutrient loads to streams (CARPENTER et al. 1998, PERKINS et al. 1998). In rural areas, the impact of agriculturalland use can far exceed that ofpoint sources (CLESCERI et al. 1986), and where agriculture is widespread the consequential effects of nutrient enrichment may be evident across entire river basins. In contrast, point source impacts may be localized but also more intense, and the impairment caused by high nutrient concentrations in stream reaches directly below WWTP can be severe (HAGGARD et al. 2001, MARTI et al. 2004). Our objective was to determine the impact of WWTP effiuent on 3 small Missouri streams by measuring how far downstream nutrient concentrations remained elevated above background levels attributable to diffuse input from agricultural and forested watersheds.