{"title":"Tarjumān Al-Qur’ān and Tafhīm Al-Qur’ān","authors":"Muhammad Yaseen Gada","doi":"10.55831/ajis.v7i1.467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the underlying factors that prompted the production of influential Qur’ān exegesis in the Indian subcontinent. Both exegeses continue to influence later exegesis, since Mawlānā Āzād (Tarjumān al-Qur’ān) and Mawlānā Mawdūdī (Tafhīm al-Qur’ān) were contemporary influential Muslim intellectuals, prolific writers and skilled journalists. However, both have different perspectives especially regarding the political matters that influenced their tafsīr writings. To achieve the mentioned goals, the article employs comparative methodology coupled with historical analysis. To do so, the paper investigates chapters 9 (Sūrah al-Tawbah) and 18 (Sūrah Al-Kahf) of the Qur’ān. Moreover, it explores and identifies their adherence to ḥadīth and their stand on fiqh while interpreting the Qur’ān. While going through a meticulous study of these exegeses, it becomes clear that Mawlānā Mawdūdī’s Tafhīm al-Qur’ān bears many imprints and influences of Tarjumān al-Qur’ān. Moreover, Tafhīm al-Qur’ān views the Qur’ān through a political prism in which Tarjumān al-Qur’ān has little interest. What makes Tafhīm al-Qur’ān influential in modern Urdu tafāsīr is that it is written in simple and easy to understand Urdu language. Regarding the ḥadīth literature and reliance on traditional fiqh sources, Tafhīm al-Qur’ān relies on them more often compared with Tarjumān al-Qur’ān.Though many have written on these two great exegeses on various fronts, no study has been done on Mawlānā Āzād’s influence on Mawdūdī’s exegesis. Moreover, a comparative study of this kind explores many similarities between them. Living in the same socio-political environment, but having different perspectives with regard to Qur’ānic exegesis, also reveals different human tendencies when approaching the Qur’ān.","PeriodicalId":178428,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v7i1.467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了促使印度次大陆产生有影响的《古兰经》ān训诂学的潜在因素。两位注释者继续影响后来的注释,因为Mawlānā Āzād (Tarjumān al-Qur ' ān)和Mawlānā Mawdūdī (tafh m al-Qur ' ān)是当代有影响力的穆斯林知识分子、多产的作家和熟练的记者。然而,他们都有不同的观点,尤其是在政治问题上,这些问题影响了他们的写作。为了达到上述目标,本文采用了比较方法和历史分析相结合的方法。为此,本文研究了《古兰经》ān的第9章(Sūrah al-Tawbah)和第18章(Sūrah Al-Kahf)。此外,它还探讨并确定了他们对ḥadīth的坚持以及他们在解释古兰经ān时对伊斯兰律法的立场。通过对这些注释的细致研究,我们可以清楚地看到Mawlānā Mawdūdī的taafh m al-Qur ' ān带有Tarjumān al-Qur ' ān的许多印记和影响。此外,tafh ā m al-Qur ' ān通过政治棱镜来看待《古兰经》ān,而Tarjumān al-Qur ' ān对此并不感兴趣。《古兰经》ān之所以对现代乌尔都语产生影响tafāsīr,是因为它是用简单易懂的乌尔都语写成的。关于ḥadīth文献和对传统伊斯兰经来源的依赖,与Tarjumān al-Qur ' ān相比,taafh ā m al-Qur ' ān更经常地依赖它们。虽然有许多人从各个方面对这两位伟大的训诂家进行了论述,但对Mawlānā Āzād对Mawdūdī训诂学的影响却没有研究。此外,这种比较研究还发现了它们之间的许多相似之处。生活在相同的社会政治环境中,但对《古兰经》ānic释经有不同的看法,也揭示了人类在接近《古兰经》ān时的不同倾向。
This article explores the underlying factors that prompted the production of influential Qur’ān exegesis in the Indian subcontinent. Both exegeses continue to influence later exegesis, since Mawlānā Āzād (Tarjumān al-Qur’ān) and Mawlānā Mawdūdī (Tafhīm al-Qur’ān) were contemporary influential Muslim intellectuals, prolific writers and skilled journalists. However, both have different perspectives especially regarding the political matters that influenced their tafsīr writings. To achieve the mentioned goals, the article employs comparative methodology coupled with historical analysis. To do so, the paper investigates chapters 9 (Sūrah al-Tawbah) and 18 (Sūrah Al-Kahf) of the Qur’ān. Moreover, it explores and identifies their adherence to ḥadīth and their stand on fiqh while interpreting the Qur’ān. While going through a meticulous study of these exegeses, it becomes clear that Mawlānā Mawdūdī’s Tafhīm al-Qur’ān bears many imprints and influences of Tarjumān al-Qur’ān. Moreover, Tafhīm al-Qur’ān views the Qur’ān through a political prism in which Tarjumān al-Qur’ān has little interest. What makes Tafhīm al-Qur’ān influential in modern Urdu tafāsīr is that it is written in simple and easy to understand Urdu language. Regarding the ḥadīth literature and reliance on traditional fiqh sources, Tafhīm al-Qur’ān relies on them more often compared with Tarjumān al-Qur’ān.Though many have written on these two great exegeses on various fronts, no study has been done on Mawlānā Āzād’s influence on Mawdūdī’s exegesis. Moreover, a comparative study of this kind explores many similarities between them. Living in the same socio-political environment, but having different perspectives with regard to Qur’ānic exegesis, also reveals different human tendencies when approaching the Qur’ān.