在专业交流中优先考虑研究课题

Kim Sydow Campbell
{"title":"在专业交流中优先考虑研究课题","authors":"Kim Sydow Campbell","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.1997.637055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the professional communication field, the gap between academics, who do most of the research, and practitioners, who might make use of those research results, is well known. Prior research has shown that, although practitioners place a high value on research, they read little of it. This paper reports efforts to address one possible cause of this problem by establishing the importance of nine research topic areas, six data collection methods/sources, and three data analysis methods for both academics and practitioners. The research involves a survey of subscribers to the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. The results of this survey effort are to be publicized in an effort to encourage researchers to pursue those projects deemed most important.","PeriodicalId":255103,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing research topics in professional communication\",\"authors\":\"Kim Sydow Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.1997.637055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the professional communication field, the gap between academics, who do most of the research, and practitioners, who might make use of those research results, is well known. Prior research has shown that, although practitioners place a high value on research, they read little of it. This paper reports efforts to address one possible cause of this problem by establishing the importance of nine research topic areas, six data collection methods/sources, and three data analysis methods for both academics and practitioners. The research involves a survey of subscribers to the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. The results of this survey effort are to be publicized in an effort to encourage researchers to pursue those projects deemed most important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1997.637055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1997.637055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在专业传播领域,从事大部分研究的学者和可能利用这些研究成果的实践者之间的差距是众所周知的。先前的研究表明,尽管从业者非常重视研究,但他们很少阅读研究。本文通过建立学者和从业者的九个研究主题领域,六种数据收集方法/来源和三种数据分析方法的重要性,报告了解决这个问题的一个可能原因的努力。这项研究涉及到对IEEE专业通信汇刊订户的调查。这项调查工作的结果将被公布,以鼓励研究人员从事那些被认为最重要的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prioritizing research topics in professional communication
Within the professional communication field, the gap between academics, who do most of the research, and practitioners, who might make use of those research results, is well known. Prior research has shown that, although practitioners place a high value on research, they read little of it. This paper reports efforts to address one possible cause of this problem by establishing the importance of nine research topic areas, six data collection methods/sources, and three data analysis methods for both academics and practitioners. The research involves a survey of subscribers to the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. The results of this survey effort are to be publicized in an effort to encourage researchers to pursue those projects deemed most important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The best of both worlds: combining usability testing and documentation projects Communication and engineers: collisions at the crossroads! Technical communication and distance learning: natural partners Using complexity theory to understand what's happening to technical communication Ethnographic research: students studying their profession within its social context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1