走向以创新为中心的共识模糊决策

J. Kacprzyk, S. Zadrożny, H. Nurmi, A. Bozhenyuk
{"title":"走向以创新为中心的共识模糊决策","authors":"J. Kacprzyk, S. Zadrożny, H. Nurmi, A. Bozhenyuk","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new class of group decision making model under fuzzy preferences and a fuzzy majority is proposed which combines the traditional, widely employed and successful decision (making) by consensus, and the new idea, based on recent results from decision and, cognitive sciences, management science, psychology, etc. suggesting that decision by consensus may often lead to noninnovative enough decisions, and a different approach based on individuals (agents) who are not consensory but express different, maybe dissensory opinions, with a higher innovation potential, may be better. Here, in the new model, after the first phase of traditional decision by consensus, we use the concepts of Kacprzyk and Zadrożny's [28] consensory and dissensory agents, and then use primarily testimonies of dissensory agents which can imply innovative options to be chosen by using Kacprzyk [17], [18], and Kacprzyk, Zadrożny, Fedrizzi and Nurmi [29] group decision solution concepts, notably various fuzzy cores (i.e. fuzzy sets of options preferred over most other options).","PeriodicalId":151289,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards innovation focused fuzzy decision making by consensus\",\"authors\":\"J. Kacprzyk, S. Zadrożny, H. Nurmi, A. Bozhenyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new class of group decision making model under fuzzy preferences and a fuzzy majority is proposed which combines the traditional, widely employed and successful decision (making) by consensus, and the new idea, based on recent results from decision and, cognitive sciences, management science, psychology, etc. suggesting that decision by consensus may often lead to noninnovative enough decisions, and a different approach based on individuals (agents) who are not consensory but express different, maybe dissensory opinions, with a higher innovation potential, may be better. Here, in the new model, after the first phase of traditional decision by consensus, we use the concepts of Kacprzyk and Zadrożny's [28] consensory and dissensory agents, and then use primarily testimonies of dissensory agents which can imply innovative options to be chosen by using Kacprzyk [17], [18], and Kacprzyk, Zadrożny, Fedrizzi and Nurmi [29] group decision solution concepts, notably various fuzzy cores (i.e. fuzzy sets of options preferred over most other options).\",\"PeriodicalId\":151289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

基于决策科学、认知科学、管理科学、心理学等学科的最新研究成果,提出了一种新的模糊偏好和模糊多数下的群体决策模型,该模型将传统的、广泛应用的、成功的共识决策与共识决策相结合,认为共识决策往往导致决策不够创新。而另一种基于个体(代理人)的不同方法可能更好,这些个体(代理人)没有共识,但表达了不同的,也许是不理智的意见,具有更高的创新潜力。在这里,在新模型中,在传统共识决策的第一阶段之后,我们使用了Kacprzyk和Zadrożny[28]的感知和感知代理的概念,然后主要使用感知代理的证词,这些证词可以暗示通过使用Kacprzyk[17],[18]和Kacprzyk, Zadrożny, Fedrizzi和Nurmi[29]群体决策解决方案概念来选择创新的选项,特别是各种模糊核心(即优选于大多数其他选项的模糊集)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards innovation focused fuzzy decision making by consensus
A new class of group decision making model under fuzzy preferences and a fuzzy majority is proposed which combines the traditional, widely employed and successful decision (making) by consensus, and the new idea, based on recent results from decision and, cognitive sciences, management science, psychology, etc. suggesting that decision by consensus may often lead to noninnovative enough decisions, and a different approach based on individuals (agents) who are not consensory but express different, maybe dissensory opinions, with a higher innovation potential, may be better. Here, in the new model, after the first phase of traditional decision by consensus, we use the concepts of Kacprzyk and Zadrożny's [28] consensory and dissensory agents, and then use primarily testimonies of dissensory agents which can imply innovative options to be chosen by using Kacprzyk [17], [18], and Kacprzyk, Zadrożny, Fedrizzi and Nurmi [29] group decision solution concepts, notably various fuzzy cores (i.e. fuzzy sets of options preferred over most other options).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
XAI Models for Quality of Experience Prediction in Wireless Networks Application of the Fuzzy Logic to Evaluation and Selection of Attribute Ranges in Machine Learning Kernel-Based k-Representatives Algorithm for Fuzzy Clustering of Categorical Data Necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy based additive definite integral Identifying and Rectifying Rational Gaps in Fuzzy Rule Based Systems for Regression Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1