弱电磁场对健康的危害?

K. Foster
{"title":"弱电磁场对健康的危害?","authors":"K. Foster","doi":"10.1109/ELECTR.1991.718197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past several decades, public and scientific debates have continued over a shifting range of issues about possible adverse health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic fields are surely hazardous, at some level of exposure. However, the well-established hazards (such as shock and burn) are obvious, mundane, and easily avoided. Various exposure standards and engineering codes offer effective protection against them. More controversial is the possibility of hazard at lower levels of exposure. Hazards have been alleged by some critics to be associated with: low-level microwave or radiofrequency radiation, and electric and/or magnetic fields associated with video display terminals (VDTs), household appliances, neighborhood distribution lines, and high voltage power transmission lines. These critics cite diverse laboratory and epidemiologic studies to support their claims of subtle hazard. I describe the scientific background of one such issue: the possibility of increased cancer risk from exposure to 50-60 Hz electric or magnetic fields. I argue that the evidence for any such hazard is weak, and much of the problem arises from scientific ambiguity, which is a common feature of risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":339281,"journal":{"name":"Electro International, 1991","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Hazards Of Weak Electromagnetic Fields?\",\"authors\":\"K. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ELECTR.1991.718197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the past several decades, public and scientific debates have continued over a shifting range of issues about possible adverse health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic fields are surely hazardous, at some level of exposure. However, the well-established hazards (such as shock and burn) are obvious, mundane, and easily avoided. Various exposure standards and engineering codes offer effective protection against them. More controversial is the possibility of hazard at lower levels of exposure. Hazards have been alleged by some critics to be associated with: low-level microwave or radiofrequency radiation, and electric and/or magnetic fields associated with video display terminals (VDTs), household appliances, neighborhood distribution lines, and high voltage power transmission lines. These critics cite diverse laboratory and epidemiologic studies to support their claims of subtle hazard. I describe the scientific background of one such issue: the possibility of increased cancer risk from exposure to 50-60 Hz electric or magnetic fields. I argue that the evidence for any such hazard is weak, and much of the problem arises from scientific ambiguity, which is a common feature of risk assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electro International, 1991\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electro International, 1991\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECTR.1991.718197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electro International, 1991","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECTR.1991.718197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几十年里,关于非电离电磁场可能对健康产生不利影响的一系列问题,公众和科学界的争论一直在继续。电磁场在一定程度上是有害的。然而,公认的危险(如电击和烧伤)是明显的,平凡的,很容易避免的。各种暴露标准和工程规范提供了有效的防护措施。更有争议的是在较低的暴露水平下可能会产生危害。一些批评人士声称,危害与以下方面有关:低水平微波或射频辐射,与视频显示终端(vdt)、家用电器、社区配电线路和高压输电线路有关的电场和/或磁场。这些批评人士引用了各种各样的实验室和流行病学研究来支持他们声称的细微危害。我描述了其中一个问题的科学背景:暴露在50-60赫兹的电场或磁场中可能会增加患癌症的风险。我认为,任何此类危害的证据都是薄弱的,许多问题源于科学上的模糊性,这是风险评估的一个共同特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Hazards Of Weak Electromagnetic Fields?
For the past several decades, public and scientific debates have continued over a shifting range of issues about possible adverse health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic fields are surely hazardous, at some level of exposure. However, the well-established hazards (such as shock and burn) are obvious, mundane, and easily avoided. Various exposure standards and engineering codes offer effective protection against them. More controversial is the possibility of hazard at lower levels of exposure. Hazards have been alleged by some critics to be associated with: low-level microwave or radiofrequency radiation, and electric and/or magnetic fields associated with video display terminals (VDTs), household appliances, neighborhood distribution lines, and high voltage power transmission lines. These critics cite diverse laboratory and epidemiologic studies to support their claims of subtle hazard. I describe the scientific background of one such issue: the possibility of increased cancer risk from exposure to 50-60 Hz electric or magnetic fields. I argue that the evidence for any such hazard is weak, and much of the problem arises from scientific ambiguity, which is a common feature of risk assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Connector Reliability Testing: Noise Spectral Analysis Statistical Control Of Electronic Measurements State-of-the-Art Of Artificial Neural Networks And Applications To Mars Robots Differences Between Commercial and Military Testing Monorail Maglev Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1