拒绝强迫治疗

Katie Watson
{"title":"拒绝强迫治疗","authors":"Katie Watson","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abortion is illegal after viability in most US states. However, the law permits, and ethics require, clinicians to respect pregnant people’s refusal of medical treatment throughout pregnancy and delivery even when it might prevent fetal demise or harm. This chapter explains why these seemingly contradictory standards are in fact consistent. It contextualizes pregnant people’s right to refuse medical intervention within the history of the legal and moral status of women, viable fetuses, and women pregnant with viable fetuses, and argues that the principle of justice breaks the tie that some people perceive between autonomy (of women) and beneficence (to fetuses), pushing the scales in favor of women. Finally, it offers ethically sound steps that obstetricians confronted with refusals should take to maximize care, and it considers the moral distress these unusual cases invariably invoke.","PeriodicalId":269787,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refusing to Force Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Katie Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abortion is illegal after viability in most US states. However, the law permits, and ethics require, clinicians to respect pregnant people’s refusal of medical treatment throughout pregnancy and delivery even when it might prevent fetal demise or harm. This chapter explains why these seemingly contradictory standards are in fact consistent. It contextualizes pregnant people’s right to refuse medical intervention within the history of the legal and moral status of women, viable fetuses, and women pregnant with viable fetuses, and argues that the principle of justice breaks the tie that some people perceive between autonomy (of women) and beneficence (to fetuses), pushing the scales in favor of women. Finally, it offers ethically sound steps that obstetricians confronted with refusals should take to maximize care, and it considers the moral distress these unusual cases invariably invoke.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Ethics in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190873028.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国大多数州,怀孕后堕胎是非法的。但是,法律允许并且道德要求临床医生尊重孕妇在整个怀孕和分娩期间拒绝接受治疗的权利,即使这样做可能防止胎儿死亡或伤害。本章解释了为什么这些看似矛盾的标准实际上是一致的。它将孕妇拒绝医疗干预的权利置于妇女、可存活胎儿和怀有可存活胎儿的妇女的法律和道德地位的历史背景下,并认为正义原则打破了一些人认为的(妇女)自主权和(对胎儿)仁慈之间的联系,推动天平向有利于妇女的方向倾斜。最后,它提供了道德上合理的步骤,产科医生面对拒绝应该采取最大限度地照顾,它考虑到这些不寻常的情况总是引起道德上的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refusing to Force Treatment
Abortion is illegal after viability in most US states. However, the law permits, and ethics require, clinicians to respect pregnant people’s refusal of medical treatment throughout pregnancy and delivery even when it might prevent fetal demise or harm. This chapter explains why these seemingly contradictory standards are in fact consistent. It contextualizes pregnant people’s right to refuse medical intervention within the history of the legal and moral status of women, viable fetuses, and women pregnant with viable fetuses, and argues that the principle of justice breaks the tie that some people perceive between autonomy (of women) and beneficence (to fetuses), pushing the scales in favor of women. Finally, it offers ethically sound steps that obstetricians confronted with refusals should take to maximize care, and it considers the moral distress these unusual cases invariably invoke.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accessing Reproductive Technology in France Why Reproductive Justice Matters to Reproductive Ethics Doing Harm Contemporary Challenges to Providing Confidential Reproductive Healthcare to Minors Oncofertility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1