藐视法庭罪责任制度的法律规制起源与展望

A. Sergeeva
{"title":"藐视法庭罪责任制度的法律规制起源与展望","authors":"A. Sergeeva","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.8.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the main stages of the formation of the criminal law prohibition, which guarantees the maintenance of a correct form of communication when participating in court proceedings. Provisions on liability for contempt of court have undergone a long evolutionary period, in the course of which the need for the existence of special legal consequences arising in connection with insulting behavior towards judges and other participants of judicial proceedings was stated. In fact, their development accompanied the formation of judicial power in Russia. Exercising justice is an important way to resolve conflicts, as a consequence of which the current legislation establishes a special procedure for participation in court proceedings. This procedure is based on respect for the attributes of judicial power. Insulting the participants of judicial proceedings grossly contradicts the generally accepted norms of behavior in society, attacks the authority of the court, as well as the persons endowed with the status of a judge. As an intentional crime, contempt of court is accompanied by humiliation of honor and dignity of judges and other participants of court proceedings. At the same time, it has a relative prevalence, excluding both the need for decriminalization and absorption by other provisions of the law protecting the honor and dignity of the individual.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genesis and Prospects of Legal Regulation of the Liability Institution for Contempt of Court\",\"authors\":\"A. Sergeeva\",\"doi\":\"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.8.\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the main stages of the formation of the criminal law prohibition, which guarantees the maintenance of a correct form of communication when participating in court proceedings. Provisions on liability for contempt of court have undergone a long evolutionary period, in the course of which the need for the existence of special legal consequences arising in connection with insulting behavior towards judges and other participants of judicial proceedings was stated. In fact, their development accompanied the formation of judicial power in Russia. Exercising justice is an important way to resolve conflicts, as a consequence of which the current legislation establishes a special procedure for participation in court proceedings. This procedure is based on respect for the attributes of judicial power. Insulting the participants of judicial proceedings grossly contradicts the generally accepted norms of behavior in society, attacks the authority of the court, as well as the persons endowed with the status of a judge. As an intentional crime, contempt of court is accompanied by humiliation of honor and dignity of judges and other participants of court proceedings. At the same time, it has a relative prevalence, excluding both the need for decriminalization and absorption by other provisions of the law protecting the honor and dignity of the individual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prologue: Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prologue: Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.8.\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.8.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了刑法禁言形成的主要阶段,以保证参与诉讼时保持正确的沟通形式。关于藐视法庭罪责任的规定经历了一个漫长的演变过程,在这个过程中,有人指出,对法官和司法程序其他参与人的侮辱行为所产生的特殊法律后果必须存在。事实上,它们的发展伴随着俄罗斯司法权的形成。行使正义是解决冲突的重要途径,因此,现行立法规定了参与法庭诉讼的特别程序。这一程序是基于对司法权属性的尊重。侮辱司法程序的参与者严重违背了社会普遍接受的行为准则,攻击了法院的权威,也攻击了被赋予法官地位的人。藐视法庭罪作为一种故意犯罪,伴随着对法官和其他诉讼参与人的荣誉和尊严的侮辱。同时,它具有相对的普遍性,既排除了非刑事化的需要,也排除了保护个人荣誉和尊严的其他法律条款的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genesis and Prospects of Legal Regulation of the Liability Institution for Contempt of Court
The article examines the main stages of the formation of the criminal law prohibition, which guarantees the maintenance of a correct form of communication when participating in court proceedings. Provisions on liability for contempt of court have undergone a long evolutionary period, in the course of which the need for the existence of special legal consequences arising in connection with insulting behavior towards judges and other participants of judicial proceedings was stated. In fact, their development accompanied the formation of judicial power in Russia. Exercising justice is an important way to resolve conflicts, as a consequence of which the current legislation establishes a special procedure for participation in court proceedings. This procedure is based on respect for the attributes of judicial power. Insulting the participants of judicial proceedings grossly contradicts the generally accepted norms of behavior in society, attacks the authority of the court, as well as the persons endowed with the status of a judge. As an intentional crime, contempt of court is accompanied by humiliation of honor and dignity of judges and other participants of court proceedings. At the same time, it has a relative prevalence, excluding both the need for decriminalization and absorption by other provisions of the law protecting the honor and dignity of the individual.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s SPECIALTY 12.00.15: A STATISTICAL STUDY OF SUBJECT MATTERS AND THE NUMBER OF DISSERTATIONS PRESENTED TO DEFENSE Electronic Investigation Technologies and Modern Format of Technical and Criminalistic Support for Criminal Cases Investigation ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF THE AIM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ACTIVITY AND MEANS OF ITS ACHIEVEMENT To the Issue of Business Trips in Labour Law of the Russian Federation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1