驾驶规则的差异对安全有影响吗?

Shan Wei, Ma Wen, Yu Nan-nan
{"title":"驾驶规则的差异对安全有影响吗?","authors":"Shan Wei, Ma Wen, Yu Nan-nan","doi":"10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left-hand traffic (LHC) and right-hand traffic (RHC) are two different rules of road adopted by countries on account of native culture and history. This paper investigates into security of road rules from the perspective of safe distance and its explaining variable drivers' response time during changing lane and overtaking. Road traffic capacity model and safe distance model are proposed to calculate safe distance based on ellipse vehicle model given that traffic capacity, driver classification, and vehicle speed and size.58 subjects are divided into LHC and RHC group tested their eye fixation in 9 regions when overtaking by eye tracker which constitutes drivers' response time. Undertaken independent-sample T test, test results indicate RHC’ s overtaking safe distance distinct from LHC and RHC has shorter response time and longer safe distance.","PeriodicalId":275033,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose the Difference in Driving Rules Matter for Security?\",\"authors\":\"Shan Wei, Ma Wen, Yu Nan-nan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Left-hand traffic (LHC) and right-hand traffic (RHC) are two different rules of road adopted by countries on account of native culture and history. This paper investigates into security of road rules from the perspective of safe distance and its explaining variable drivers' response time during changing lane and overtaking. Road traffic capacity model and safe distance model are proposed to calculate safe distance based on ellipse vehicle model given that traffic capacity, driver classification, and vehicle speed and size.58 subjects are divided into LHC and RHC group tested their eye fixation in 9 regions when overtaking by eye tracker which constitutes drivers' response time. Undertaken independent-sample T test, test results indicate RHC’ s overtaking safe distance distinct from LHC and RHC has shorter response time and longer safe distance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

左手交通(LHC)和右手交通(RHC)是各国由于各自的文化和历史而采用的两种不同的道路规则。本文从安全距离的角度研究道路规则的安全性及其对驾驶员变道和超车反应时间的解释。在考虑交通容量、驾驶员分类、车速和车辆大小的情况下,提出了基于椭圆车辆模型的道路交通容量模型和安全距离模型,计算安全距离。将58名被试分为LHC组和RHC组,通过眼动仪测试了他们超车时的9个区域的眼球注视,这些区域构成了司机的反应时间。进行独立样本T检验,结果表明RHC超车安全距离与LHC不同,RHC反应时间更短,超车安全距离更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dose the Difference in Driving Rules Matter for Security?
Left-hand traffic (LHC) and right-hand traffic (RHC) are two different rules of road adopted by countries on account of native culture and history. This paper investigates into security of road rules from the perspective of safe distance and its explaining variable drivers' response time during changing lane and overtaking. Road traffic capacity model and safe distance model are proposed to calculate safe distance based on ellipse vehicle model given that traffic capacity, driver classification, and vehicle speed and size.58 subjects are divided into LHC and RHC group tested their eye fixation in 9 regions when overtaking by eye tracker which constitutes drivers' response time. Undertaken independent-sample T test, test results indicate RHC’ s overtaking safe distance distinct from LHC and RHC has shorter response time and longer safe distance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experience-Centric Service Cooperation Strategies and Pricing Strategies in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Innovation Management Mechanism Comparative Study on China-USA-Russia National Defense-Related Science and Technology Industry Does the Stakeholder Drive Knowledge Transfer in Innovation Ecosystem? -A View from Institutional Legitimacy Perspective Impact of Work Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior on Organizational Performance; Moderating Role of Perceived Distributive Fairness What is the Value of the Online Retailer's Demand Forecast Information Sharing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1