询问技术债务:栈溢出技术债务问题的特征与自动识别

Nicholas Kozanidis, R. Verdecchia, Emitzá Guzmán
{"title":"询问技术债务:栈溢出技术债务问题的特征与自动识别","authors":"Nicholas Kozanidis, R. Verdecchia, Emitzá Guzmán","doi":"10.1145/3544902.3546245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Q&A sites allow to study how users reference and request support on technical debt. To date only few studies, focusing on narrow aspects, investigate technical debt on Stack Overflow. Aims: We aim at gaining an in-depth understanding on the characteristics of technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. In addition, we assess if identification strategies based on machine learning can be used to automatically identify and classify technical debt questions. Method: We use automated and manual processes to identify technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. The final set of 415 questions is analyzed to study (i) technical debt types, (ii) question length, (iii) perceived urgency, (iv) sentiment, and (v) themes. Natural language processing and machine learning techniques are used to assess if questions can be identified and classified automatically. Results: Architecture debt is the most recurring debt type, followed by code and design debt. Most questions display mild urgency, with frequency of higher urgency steadily declining as urgency rises. Question length varies across debt types. Sentiment is mostly neutral. 29 recurrent themes emerge. Machine learning can be used to identify technical debt questions and binary urgency, but not debt types. Conclusions: Different patterns emerge from the analysis of technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. The results provide further insights on the phenomenon, and support the adoption of a more comprehensive strategy to identify technical debt questions.","PeriodicalId":220679,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asking about Technical Debt: Characteristics and Automatic Identification of Technical Debt Questions on Stack Overflow\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Kozanidis, R. Verdecchia, Emitzá Guzmán\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3544902.3546245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Q&A sites allow to study how users reference and request support on technical debt. To date only few studies, focusing on narrow aspects, investigate technical debt on Stack Overflow. Aims: We aim at gaining an in-depth understanding on the characteristics of technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. In addition, we assess if identification strategies based on machine learning can be used to automatically identify and classify technical debt questions. Method: We use automated and manual processes to identify technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. The final set of 415 questions is analyzed to study (i) technical debt types, (ii) question length, (iii) perceived urgency, (iv) sentiment, and (v) themes. Natural language processing and machine learning techniques are used to assess if questions can be identified and classified automatically. Results: Architecture debt is the most recurring debt type, followed by code and design debt. Most questions display mild urgency, with frequency of higher urgency steadily declining as urgency rises. Question length varies across debt types. Sentiment is mostly neutral. 29 recurrent themes emerge. Machine learning can be used to identify technical debt questions and binary urgency, but not debt types. Conclusions: Different patterns emerge from the analysis of technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. The results provide further insights on the phenomenon, and support the adoption of a more comprehensive strategy to identify technical debt questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544902.3546245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544902.3546245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:问答网站允许研究用户如何参考和请求技术债务支持。迄今为止,只有少数研究集中在狭窄的方面,调查了堆栈溢出的技术债务。目的:我们的目标是深入了解堆栈溢出的技术债务问题的特征。此外,我们评估了基于机器学习的识别策略是否可用于自动识别和分类技术债务问题。方法:我们使用自动化和手动流程来识别Stack Overflow上的技术债务问题。最后一组415个问题进行分析,以研究(i)技术债务类型,(ii)问题长度,(iii)感知紧迫性,(iv)情绪和(v)主题。使用自然语言处理和机器学习技术来评估问题是否可以自动识别和分类。结果:架构债是最常见的债类型,其次是代码和设计债。大多数问题表现出轻微的紧迫性,随着紧迫性的增加,较高紧迫性的出现频率稳步下降。问题的长度因债务类型而异。市场情绪基本中性。出现了29个反复出现的主题。机器学习可以用来识别技术债务问题和二元紧迫性,但不能识别债务类型。结论:通过对Stack Overflow的技术债务问题的分析,出现了不同的模式。结果提供了对该现象的进一步见解,并支持采用更全面的策略来识别技术债务问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asking about Technical Debt: Characteristics and Automatic Identification of Technical Debt Questions on Stack Overflow
Background: Q&A sites allow to study how users reference and request support on technical debt. To date only few studies, focusing on narrow aspects, investigate technical debt on Stack Overflow. Aims: We aim at gaining an in-depth understanding on the characteristics of technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. In addition, we assess if identification strategies based on machine learning can be used to automatically identify and classify technical debt questions. Method: We use automated and manual processes to identify technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. The final set of 415 questions is analyzed to study (i) technical debt types, (ii) question length, (iii) perceived urgency, (iv) sentiment, and (v) themes. Natural language processing and machine learning techniques are used to assess if questions can be identified and classified automatically. Results: Architecture debt is the most recurring debt type, followed by code and design debt. Most questions display mild urgency, with frequency of higher urgency steadily declining as urgency rises. Question length varies across debt types. Sentiment is mostly neutral. 29 recurrent themes emerge. Machine learning can be used to identify technical debt questions and binary urgency, but not debt types. Conclusions: Different patterns emerge from the analysis of technical debt questions on Stack Overflow. The results provide further insights on the phenomenon, and support the adoption of a more comprehensive strategy to identify technical debt questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Relationship between Community and Design Smells in Open-Source Software Projects: An Empirical Study A Preliminary Investigation of MLOps Practices in GitHub PG-VulNet: Detect Supply Chain Vulnerabilities in IoT Devices using Pseudo-code and Graphs On the Relationship Between Story Points and Development Effort in Agile Open-Source Software DevOps Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Low-code Trend
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1