Steven Bradley, M. Parker, Rukiye Altin, L. Barker, Sara Hooshangi, Samia Kamal, Thom Kunkeler, Ruth G. Lennon, Fiona McNeill, J. Minguillón, Jack Parkinson, Svetlana Peltsverger, Naaz Sibia
{"title":"计算机科学中女性模块选择的调查方法","authors":"Steven Bradley, M. Parker, Rukiye Altin, L. Barker, Sara Hooshangi, Samia Kamal, Thom Kunkeler, Ruth G. Lennon, Fiona McNeill, J. Minguillón, Jack Parkinson, Svetlana Peltsverger, Naaz Sibia","doi":"10.1145/3587103.3594209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At ITiCSE 2021, Working Group 3 examined the evidence for teaching practices that broaden participation for women in computing, based on the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) Engagement Practices framework. One of the report's recommendations was \"Make connections from computing to your students' lives and interests (Make it Matter) but don't assume you know what those interests are; find out! \" The goal of this 2023 working group is to find out what interests women students by bringing together data from our institutions on undergraduate module enrollment, seeing how they differ for women and men, and what drives those choices. We will code published module content based on ACM curriculum guidelines and combine these data to build a hierarchical statistical model of factors affecting student choice. This model should be able to tell us how interesting or valuable different topics are to women, and to what extent topic affects choice of module - as opposed to other factors such as the instructor, the timetable, or the mode of assessment. Equipped with this knowledge we can advise departments how to focus curriculum development on areas that are of value to women, and hence work towards making the discipline more inclusive.","PeriodicalId":366365,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Methodology for Investigating Women's Module Choices in Computer Science\",\"authors\":\"Steven Bradley, M. Parker, Rukiye Altin, L. Barker, Sara Hooshangi, Samia Kamal, Thom Kunkeler, Ruth G. Lennon, Fiona McNeill, J. Minguillón, Jack Parkinson, Svetlana Peltsverger, Naaz Sibia\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3587103.3594209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At ITiCSE 2021, Working Group 3 examined the evidence for teaching practices that broaden participation for women in computing, based on the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) Engagement Practices framework. One of the report's recommendations was \\\"Make connections from computing to your students' lives and interests (Make it Matter) but don't assume you know what those interests are; find out! \\\" The goal of this 2023 working group is to find out what interests women students by bringing together data from our institutions on undergraduate module enrollment, seeing how they differ for women and men, and what drives those choices. We will code published module content based on ACM curriculum guidelines and combine these data to build a hierarchical statistical model of factors affecting student choice. This model should be able to tell us how interesting or valuable different topics are to women, and to what extent topic affects choice of module - as opposed to other factors such as the instructor, the timetable, or the mode of assessment. Equipped with this knowledge we can advise departments how to focus curriculum development on areas that are of value to women, and hence work towards making the discipline more inclusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":366365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587103.3594209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587103.3594209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在icticse 2021上,第三工作组根据国家妇女与信息技术中心(NCWIT)参与实践框架,研究了扩大女性参与计算的教学实践的证据。该报告的建议之一是“将计算机与学生的生活和兴趣联系起来(Make it Matter),但不要假设你知道这些兴趣是什么;去看看吧!”这个2023年工作组的目标是,通过汇集我们各机构关于本科模块招生的数据,了解女性和男性的差异,以及推动这些选择的因素,找出女性学生感兴趣的是什么。我们将根据ACM课程指南对已发布的模块内容进行编码,并将这些数据结合起来,构建影响学生选择因素的分层统计模型。这个模型应该能够告诉我们不同的话题对女性来说有多有趣或有价值,以及话题在多大程度上影响了模块的选择——而不是其他因素,如教师、时间表或评估模式。有了这些知识,我们可以建议院系如何将课程开发重点放在对女性有价值的领域,从而努力使这门学科更具包容性。
A Methodology for Investigating Women's Module Choices in Computer Science
At ITiCSE 2021, Working Group 3 examined the evidence for teaching practices that broaden participation for women in computing, based on the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) Engagement Practices framework. One of the report's recommendations was "Make connections from computing to your students' lives and interests (Make it Matter) but don't assume you know what those interests are; find out! " The goal of this 2023 working group is to find out what interests women students by bringing together data from our institutions on undergraduate module enrollment, seeing how they differ for women and men, and what drives those choices. We will code published module content based on ACM curriculum guidelines and combine these data to build a hierarchical statistical model of factors affecting student choice. This model should be able to tell us how interesting or valuable different topics are to women, and to what extent topic affects choice of module - as opposed to other factors such as the instructor, the timetable, or the mode of assessment. Equipped with this knowledge we can advise departments how to focus curriculum development on areas that are of value to women, and hence work towards making the discipline more inclusive.