重复任务的过程挖掘:系统的文献综述

Chenchen Duan, Qingjie Wei
{"title":"重复任务的过程挖掘:系统的文献综述","authors":"Chenchen Duan, Qingjie Wei","doi":"10.1109/ICAICA50127.2020.9182667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process mining improves and provides insights for business processes, which are information related to process execution. In general, process mining can be separated into three classes: process discovery, conformance checking and process enhancement. In order to simplify the process model, we make an assumption that both events in the log and tasks in the model have an injective relation in process mining, i.e., do not allow two tasks to share the same label (thus duplicates task). In addition, Duplicate tasks have some issues concerning the quality of process model discovered and the potential indeterminism in conformance checking. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature review of process discovery and conformance checking metrics for duplicate tasks. This review can: (1) provide a comprehensive review of the current work of duplicate tasks in process discovery and conformance checking; (2) help researchers choose proper process mining approach, tools, and metrics; (3) identify research opportunities in duplicate tasks.","PeriodicalId":113564,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications (ICAICA)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Mining of Duplicate Tasks: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Chenchen Duan, Qingjie Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAICA50127.2020.9182667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Process mining improves and provides insights for business processes, which are information related to process execution. In general, process mining can be separated into three classes: process discovery, conformance checking and process enhancement. In order to simplify the process model, we make an assumption that both events in the log and tasks in the model have an injective relation in process mining, i.e., do not allow two tasks to share the same label (thus duplicates task). In addition, Duplicate tasks have some issues concerning the quality of process model discovered and the potential indeterminism in conformance checking. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature review of process discovery and conformance checking metrics for duplicate tasks. This review can: (1) provide a comprehensive review of the current work of duplicate tasks in process discovery and conformance checking; (2) help researchers choose proper process mining approach, tools, and metrics; (3) identify research opportunities in duplicate tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications (ICAICA)\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications (ICAICA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICA50127.2020.9182667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications (ICAICA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICA50127.2020.9182667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

流程挖掘改进并提供了对业务流程的洞察,业务流程是与流程执行相关的信息。一般来说,过程挖掘可以分为三类:过程发现、一致性检查和过程增强。为了简化流程模型,我们假设日志中的事件和模型中的任务在流程挖掘中具有内射关系,即不允许两个任务共享相同的标签(从而重复任务)。此外,重复任务在发现过程模型的质量和一致性检查中潜在的不确定性方面存在一些问题。在本文中,我们对重复任务的过程发现和一致性检查度量进行了系统的文献回顾。该评审可以:(1)对过程发现和符合性检查中重复任务的当前工作进行全面评审;(2)帮助研究人员选择合适的流程挖掘方法、工具和指标;(3)在重复任务中识别研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Process Mining of Duplicate Tasks: A Systematic Literature Review
Process mining improves and provides insights for business processes, which are information related to process execution. In general, process mining can be separated into three classes: process discovery, conformance checking and process enhancement. In order to simplify the process model, we make an assumption that both events in the log and tasks in the model have an injective relation in process mining, i.e., do not allow two tasks to share the same label (thus duplicates task). In addition, Duplicate tasks have some issues concerning the quality of process model discovered and the potential indeterminism in conformance checking. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature review of process discovery and conformance checking metrics for duplicate tasks. This review can: (1) provide a comprehensive review of the current work of duplicate tasks in process discovery and conformance checking; (2) help researchers choose proper process mining approach, tools, and metrics; (3) identify research opportunities in duplicate tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined prediction model of tuberculosis based on generalized regression neural network Spinal fracture lesions segmentation based on U-net Review of Research on Multilevel Inverter Based on Asynchronous Motor Application of neural network in abnormal AIS data identification Integrated platform of on-board computer and star sensor electronics system based on COTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1