{"title":"Den glatte musikken og muligheten for en erfaring","authors":"Bendik Fredriksen","doi":"10.23865/noasp.115.ch5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A word often used to describe music is “smooth”. It is mostly meant as a negative term, used to label music as commercial, light, superficial and easily forgotten. However, smooth music is also well-made, with a high level of professionality. In this chapter I take as a starting point the criticism of beauty as smoothness found in Byung-Chul Han’s book Die Errettung des Schönen [Saving beauty], and investigate how this criticism applies to music. Furthermore, I try to define what makes music smooth. While smoothness can easily be defined when speaking about physical objects, music is evasive. Hence, smoothness is defined metaphorically, and according to what it is not, e.g. a work of art, or something that can lead to an experience, a concept I discuss in light of Gadamer, Heidegger, Adorno and Vetlesen. I claim that due to the elusive character of music almost any music can lead to an experience, but it is not a product of the subject’s efforts alone. Moreover, smoothness as a characteristic of music seems to have a liminal quality to it, as it cannot be defined in light of its opposite, but is trapped in its own perfection.","PeriodicalId":390651,"journal":{"name":"Musikkfilosofiske tekster. Tanker om musikk og språk, tolkning, erfaring, tid, klang, stillhet m.m.","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musikkfilosofiske tekster. Tanker om musikk og språk, tolkning, erfaring, tid, klang, stillhet m.m.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.115.ch5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一个经常用来形容音乐的词是“流畅的”。它通常是一个贬义词,用来给音乐贴上商业、轻松、肤浅和容易被遗忘的标签。然而,流畅的音乐也制作得很好,具有很高的专业水平。在这一章中,我将从韩炳哲的《拯救美》(Die Errettung des Schönen)一书中对“平滑的美”的批评为出发点,研究这种批评如何适用于音乐。此外,我试图定义是什么让音乐流畅。当谈到物理对象时,流畅性很容易被定义,而音乐则是回避性的。因此,平滑是隐喻性的定义,根据它不是什么,例如,一件艺术作品,或者可以导致一种体验的东西,我根据伽达默尔、海德格尔、阿多诺和维特勒森的观点来讨论这个概念。我认为,由于音乐难以捉摸的特性,几乎任何音乐都可以带来一种体验,但它并不是主体努力的单独产物。此外,平滑作为音乐的一种特征,似乎具有一种有限的品质,因为它不能根据它的对立面来定义,而是被困在它自己的完美之中。
A word often used to describe music is “smooth”. It is mostly meant as a negative term, used to label music as commercial, light, superficial and easily forgotten. However, smooth music is also well-made, with a high level of professionality. In this chapter I take as a starting point the criticism of beauty as smoothness found in Byung-Chul Han’s book Die Errettung des Schönen [Saving beauty], and investigate how this criticism applies to music. Furthermore, I try to define what makes music smooth. While smoothness can easily be defined when speaking about physical objects, music is evasive. Hence, smoothness is defined metaphorically, and according to what it is not, e.g. a work of art, or something that can lead to an experience, a concept I discuss in light of Gadamer, Heidegger, Adorno and Vetlesen. I claim that due to the elusive character of music almost any music can lead to an experience, but it is not a product of the subject’s efforts alone. Moreover, smoothness as a characteristic of music seems to have a liminal quality to it, as it cannot be defined in light of its opposite, but is trapped in its own perfection.