试图建立玻璃聚合物在关键结构服务中的设计余量

Bart Kemper, Kaylie Kling Williams
{"title":"试图建立玻璃聚合物在关键结构服务中的设计余量","authors":"Bart Kemper, Kaylie Kling Williams","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The existing code procedures for glassy polymers are in ASME Safety Standard for Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy (PVHO-1). The current service spans hostile conditions in the North Sea to controlled medical environments. These procedures are based on an empirical method and do not use material properties. The system is locked into specific shapes and cannot be adjusted to account for yield strength, ultimate strength, and other material considerations. An ASME task group is developing a Design By Analysis (DBA) methodology in order to allow for optimization in current service and innovation in other service. This paper presents the attempt to develop design margins as part of an overall risk assessment process that considers material properties, service conditions, and other factors not currently incorporated in the existing design method. Historical work used to develop the current system are analyzed using modern methods to attempt to quantifiably determine the existing design margins. The challenge is the empirical method implicitly relies on polymer manufacturers to greatly exceed the code. This, coupled with different modes of failure, results in no direct manner to compare PVHOs to conventional ASME pressure vessels design margins.","PeriodicalId":146533,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attempting To Establish Design Margins for Glassy Polymers In Critical Structural Service\",\"authors\":\"Bart Kemper, Kaylie Kling Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-71836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The existing code procedures for glassy polymers are in ASME Safety Standard for Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy (PVHO-1). The current service spans hostile conditions in the North Sea to controlled medical environments. These procedures are based on an empirical method and do not use material properties. The system is locked into specific shapes and cannot be adjusted to account for yield strength, ultimate strength, and other material considerations. An ASME task group is developing a Design By Analysis (DBA) methodology in order to allow for optimization in current service and innovation in other service. This paper presents the attempt to develop design margins as part of an overall risk assessment process that considers material properties, service conditions, and other factors not currently incorporated in the existing design method. Historical work used to develop the current system are analyzed using modern methods to attempt to quantifiably determine the existing design margins. The challenge is the empirical method implicitly relies on polymer manufacturers to greatly exceed the code. This, coupled with different modes of failure, results in no direct manner to compare PVHOs to conventional ASME pressure vessels design margins.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现有的玻璃聚合物规范程序在ASME人类使用压力容器安全标准(PVHO-1)中。目前的服务范围从北海恶劣的条件到受控的医疗环境。这些程序基于经验方法,不使用材料特性。该系统被锁定为特定的形状,无法根据屈服强度、极限强度和其他材料考虑因素进行调整。一个ASME任务组正在开发一种基于分析的设计(DBA)方法,以便对当前服务进行优化,并对其他服务进行创新。本文提出了开发设计余量作为整体风险评估过程的一部分的尝试,该过程考虑了材料特性、使用条件和其他目前未纳入现有设计方法的因素。使用现代方法分析用于开发当前系统的历史工作,以尝试定量确定现有的设计余量。挑战在于经验方法隐含地依赖于聚合物制造商大大超过代码。这一点,再加上不同的失效模式,导致无法直接将PVHOs与传统ASME压力容器的设计裕度进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attempting To Establish Design Margins for Glassy Polymers In Critical Structural Service
The existing code procedures for glassy polymers are in ASME Safety Standard for Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy (PVHO-1). The current service spans hostile conditions in the North Sea to controlled medical environments. These procedures are based on an empirical method and do not use material properties. The system is locked into specific shapes and cannot be adjusted to account for yield strength, ultimate strength, and other material considerations. An ASME task group is developing a Design By Analysis (DBA) methodology in order to allow for optimization in current service and innovation in other service. This paper presents the attempt to develop design margins as part of an overall risk assessment process that considers material properties, service conditions, and other factors not currently incorporated in the existing design method. Historical work used to develop the current system are analyzed using modern methods to attempt to quantifiably determine the existing design margins. The challenge is the empirical method implicitly relies on polymer manufacturers to greatly exceed the code. This, coupled with different modes of failure, results in no direct manner to compare PVHOs to conventional ASME pressure vessels design margins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Prediction Software to Evaluate Frisbee Movement An Imperfect Usage-Based Preventive Maintenance Planning Model for Railway Track Superstructures Development of Algorithms for Improving Fiber-Optical Rail Circuit on Railway Spans Design, Modeling, and Fabrication of a Ventilator Prototype - A Successful Student Project Story An Overview of the Research Landscape in the Field of Safe Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1