产品线验证策略:案例研究和实验

S. Apel, Alexander von Rhein, Philipp Wendler, Armin Größlinger, Dirk Beyer
{"title":"产品线验证策略:案例研究和实验","authors":"S. Apel, Alexander von Rhein, Philipp Wendler, Armin Größlinger, Dirk Beyer","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Product-line technology is increasingly used in mission-critical and safety-critical applications. Hence, researchers are developing verification approaches that follow different strategies to cope with the specific properties of product lines. While the research community is discussing the mutual strengths and weaknesses of the different strategies - mostly at a conceptual level - there is a lack of evidence in terms of case studies, tool implementations, and experiments. We have collected and prepared six product lines as subject systems for experimentation. Furthermore, we have developed a model-checking tool chain for C-based and Java-based product lines, called SPLverifier, which we use to compare sample-based and family-based strategies with regard to verification performance and the ability to find defects. Based on the experimental results and an analytical model, we revisit the discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of product-line-verification strategies.","PeriodicalId":322423,"journal":{"name":"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"171","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for product-line verification: Case studies and experiments\",\"authors\":\"S. Apel, Alexander von Rhein, Philipp Wendler, Armin Größlinger, Dirk Beyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Product-line technology is increasingly used in mission-critical and safety-critical applications. Hence, researchers are developing verification approaches that follow different strategies to cope with the specific properties of product lines. While the research community is discussing the mutual strengths and weaknesses of the different strategies - mostly at a conceptual level - there is a lack of evidence in terms of case studies, tool implementations, and experiments. We have collected and prepared six product lines as subject systems for experimentation. Furthermore, we have developed a model-checking tool chain for C-based and Java-based product lines, called SPLverifier, which we use to compare sample-based and family-based strategies with regard to verification performance and the ability to find defects. Based on the experimental results and an analytical model, we revisit the discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of product-line-verification strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"171\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 171

摘要

产品线技术越来越多地用于关键任务和安全关键应用。因此,研究人员正在开发验证方法,遵循不同的策略来处理产品线的特定属性。虽然研究界正在讨论不同策略的相互优势和劣势——主要是在概念层面上——但在案例研究、工具实现和实验方面缺乏证据。我们收集并准备了6条产品线作为实验的主题系统。此外,我们已经为基于c和基于java的产品线开发了一个模型检查工具链,称为SPLverifier,我们使用它来比较基于样本和基于家族的策略在验证性能和发现缺陷的能力方面的差异。基于实验结果和分析模型,我们重新讨论了产品线验证策略的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies for product-line verification: Case studies and experiments
Product-line technology is increasingly used in mission-critical and safety-critical applications. Hence, researchers are developing verification approaches that follow different strategies to cope with the specific properties of product lines. While the research community is discussing the mutual strengths and weaknesses of the different strategies - mostly at a conceptual level - there is a lack of evidence in terms of case studies, tool implementations, and experiments. We have collected and prepared six product lines as subject systems for experimentation. Furthermore, we have developed a model-checking tool chain for C-based and Java-based product lines, called SPLverifier, which we use to compare sample-based and family-based strategies with regard to verification performance and the ability to find defects. Based on the experimental results and an analytical model, we revisit the discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of product-line-verification strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studios in software engineering education: Towards an evaluable model Not going to take this anymore: Multi-objective overtime planning for Software Engineering projects 3rd International workshop on collaborative teaching of globally distributed software development (CTGDSD 2013) TestEvol: A tool for analyzing test-suite evolution A characteristic study on failures of production distributed data-parallel programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1