机器学习算法与卷积神经网络模型脑卒中风险预测的比较分析

M. Ferdous, Rifat Shahriyar
{"title":"机器学习算法与卷积神经网络模型脑卒中风险预测的比较分析","authors":"M. Ferdous, Rifat Shahriyar","doi":"10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical, sometimes fatal medical disease called a stroke happens when the blood flow to a portion of the brain is broken off. In the case of stroke, urgent treatment is very essential. Nowadays, stroke is the main cause of death and impairment globally, according to WHO. In this situation, it will be very helpful if we predict the probability of stroke earlier depending on some most important features. Many researchers use different machine learning algorithms for prediction but very few researchers use stacking methods and CNN. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a stacking classifier of ensemble methods and the CNN model. In this paper, data-set is collected from Kaggle. Stroke data is imbalanced. Random oversampling is used for balancing data-set. Then most important features are find out using feature selection method, then applying different machine learning algorithms such as Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, Support vector machine, Random forest classifier, KNearest neighbour's classifier, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, Stacking of six algorithms (Decision Tree Classifier, Support vector machine, Random forest classifier, KNearest neighbor's classifier, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes) and CNN. Then comparing the performances for predicting the probability of stroke during both the training and testing periods. Results show that the Stacking of six algorithms gives the highest accuracy, which is 99.89% for testing and 100% for training.","PeriodicalId":131537,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis for Stroke Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Convolutional Neural Network Model\",\"authors\":\"M. Ferdous, Rifat Shahriyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A critical, sometimes fatal medical disease called a stroke happens when the blood flow to a portion of the brain is broken off. In the case of stroke, urgent treatment is very essential. Nowadays, stroke is the main cause of death and impairment globally, according to WHO. In this situation, it will be very helpful if we predict the probability of stroke earlier depending on some most important features. Many researchers use different machine learning algorithms for prediction but very few researchers use stacking methods and CNN. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a stacking classifier of ensemble methods and the CNN model. In this paper, data-set is collected from Kaggle. Stroke data is imbalanced. Random oversampling is used for balancing data-set. Then most important features are find out using feature selection method, then applying different machine learning algorithms such as Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, Support vector machine, Random forest classifier, KNearest neighbour's classifier, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, Stacking of six algorithms (Decision Tree Classifier, Support vector machine, Random forest classifier, KNearest neighbor's classifier, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes) and CNN. Then comparing the performances for predicting the probability of stroke during both the training and testing periods. Results show that the Stacking of six algorithms gives the highest accuracy, which is 99.89% for testing and 100% for training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中风是一种严重的,有时甚至是致命的医学疾病,当流向大脑某一部分的血液中断时就会发生。如果是中风,紧急治疗是非常必要的。据世卫组织称,如今,中风是全球死亡和损害的主要原因。在这种情况下,如果我们根据一些最重要的特征更早地预测中风的概率,将会非常有帮助。许多研究人员使用不同的机器学习算法进行预测,但很少有研究人员使用堆叠方法和CNN。本文的主要贡献是开发了集成方法的堆叠分类器和CNN模型。本文的数据集来自于Kaggle。行程数据不平衡。采用随机过采样对数据集进行平衡。然后使用特征选择方法找出最重要的特征,然后应用不同的机器学习算法,如Logistic回归,决策树分类器,支持向量机,随机森林分类器,KNearest neighbor分类器,Bernoulli Naïve贝叶斯,高斯Naïve贝叶斯,六种算法的叠加(决策树分类器,支持向量机,随机森林分类器,KNearest neighbor分类器,Bernoulli Naïve贝叶斯,高斯Naïve贝叶斯)和CNN。然后比较了训练和测试期间预测中风概率的性能。结果表明,6种算法叠加得到的准确率最高,测试准确率为99.89%,训练准确率为100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Analysis for Stroke Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Convolutional Neural Network Model
A critical, sometimes fatal medical disease called a stroke happens when the blood flow to a portion of the brain is broken off. In the case of stroke, urgent treatment is very essential. Nowadays, stroke is the main cause of death and impairment globally, according to WHO. In this situation, it will be very helpful if we predict the probability of stroke earlier depending on some most important features. Many researchers use different machine learning algorithms for prediction but very few researchers use stacking methods and CNN. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a stacking classifier of ensemble methods and the CNN model. In this paper, data-set is collected from Kaggle. Stroke data is imbalanced. Random oversampling is used for balancing data-set. Then most important features are find out using feature selection method, then applying different machine learning algorithms such as Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, Support vector machine, Random forest classifier, KNearest neighbour's classifier, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, Stacking of six algorithms (Decision Tree Classifier, Support vector machine, Random forest classifier, KNearest neighbor's classifier, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes) and CNN. Then comparing the performances for predicting the probability of stroke during both the training and testing periods. Results show that the Stacking of six algorithms gives the highest accuracy, which is 99.89% for testing and 100% for training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyclone Prediction Visualization Tools Using Machine Learning Models and Optical Flow Exploratory Perspective of PV Net-Energy-Metering for Residential Prosumers: A Case Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh Estimation of Soil Moisture with Meteorological Variables in Supervised Machine Learning Models Deep CNN-GRU Based Human Activity Recognition with Automatic Feature Extraction Using Smartphone and Wearable Sensors Bengali-English Neural Machine Translation Using Deep Learning Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1