英汉交叉语言词嵌入相似度计算

Like Wang, Yuan Sun, Xiaobing Zhao
{"title":"英汉交叉语言词嵌入相似度计算","authors":"Like Wang, Yuan Sun, Xiaobing Zhao","doi":"10.1145/3299819.3299831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differences in languages among various countries, regions, and nationalities have created huge obstacles in communication. Cross-language word similarity (CLWS) calculation is the most practical way to solve this problem. Selection of corpus is one of the factors that influence the calculate result. This paper compares the similarity in word embeddings of bilingual parallel and non-parallel corpus on traditional models. Firstly, this paper uses the fastText method to calculate the monolingual word embeddings of Chinese and English, and computes the semantic similarity between the two embeddings. Then it maps the word embeddings into an implicit shared space using Multilingual Unsupervised and Supervised Embedding (MUSE), and compares the effect of unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods in parallel and non-parallel corpus. Finally, the experimental results prove that MUSE model could be better align monolingual word embeddings space, non-parallel corpus have the same effect compares with parallel corpus in calculating the CLWS.","PeriodicalId":119217,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English-Chinese Cross Language Word Embedding Similarity Calculation\",\"authors\":\"Like Wang, Yuan Sun, Xiaobing Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3299819.3299831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differences in languages among various countries, regions, and nationalities have created huge obstacles in communication. Cross-language word similarity (CLWS) calculation is the most practical way to solve this problem. Selection of corpus is one of the factors that influence the calculate result. This paper compares the similarity in word embeddings of bilingual parallel and non-parallel corpus on traditional models. Firstly, this paper uses the fastText method to calculate the monolingual word embeddings of Chinese and English, and computes the semantic similarity between the two embeddings. Then it maps the word embeddings into an implicit shared space using Multilingual Unsupervised and Supervised Embedding (MUSE), and compares the effect of unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods in parallel and non-parallel corpus. Finally, the experimental results prove that MUSE model could be better align monolingual word embeddings space, non-parallel corpus have the same effect compares with parallel corpus in calculating the CLWS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3299819.3299831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3299819.3299831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同国家、地区和民族之间的语言差异给交流造成了巨大的障碍。跨语言词相似度(CLWS)计算是解决这一问题最实用的方法。语料库的选择是影响计算结果的因素之一。本文比较了传统模型下双语平行语料库和非平行语料库词嵌入的相似度。首先,本文采用fastText方法对中文和英文的单语词嵌入进行计算,并计算两种嵌入之间的语义相似度。然后使用多语言无监督和有监督嵌入(MUSE)将词嵌入映射到隐式共享空间,并比较无监督和有监督机器学习方法在并行和非并行语料库中的效果。最后,实验结果证明MUSE模型可以更好地对齐单语词嵌入空间,非并行语料库与并行语料库在计算CLWS方面效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
English-Chinese Cross Language Word Embedding Similarity Calculation
Differences in languages among various countries, regions, and nationalities have created huge obstacles in communication. Cross-language word similarity (CLWS) calculation is the most practical way to solve this problem. Selection of corpus is one of the factors that influence the calculate result. This paper compares the similarity in word embeddings of bilingual parallel and non-parallel corpus on traditional models. Firstly, this paper uses the fastText method to calculate the monolingual word embeddings of Chinese and English, and computes the semantic similarity between the two embeddings. Then it maps the word embeddings into an implicit shared space using Multilingual Unsupervised and Supervised Embedding (MUSE), and compares the effect of unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods in parallel and non-parallel corpus. Finally, the experimental results prove that MUSE model could be better align monolingual word embeddings space, non-parallel corpus have the same effect compares with parallel corpus in calculating the CLWS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Fault Diagnosis and Maintenance Decision System for Production Line Based on Human-machine Multi- Information Fusion Do We Need More Training Samples For Text Classification? Risk Assessment for Big Data in Cloud: Security, Privacy and Trust Natural Language Processing for Productivity Metrics for Software Development Profiling in Enterprise Applications Feature Extraction Driven Modeling Attack Against Double Arbiter PUF and Its Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1