一项随机临床试验:对运动控制功能障碍的男性进行6周腰椎稳定和整体姿势再教育训练后的髋关节肌肉灵活性

A. Rahmani, H. Minoonejad, F. Seidi, Yousef Moghadas Tabrizi
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:对运动控制功能障碍的男性进行6周腰椎稳定和整体姿势再教育训练后的髋关节肌肉灵活性","authors":"A. Rahmani, H. Minoonejad, F. Seidi, Yousef Moghadas Tabrizi","doi":"10.34172/hmj.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exercise therapy is one of the most effective methods for dealing with low back pain. The present study aimed to compare to examine the effects of two protocols, i.e., six weeks of lumbar stability exercises (LSE) and global postural reeducation exercises (GPR), followed by a subsequent period of non-training on hip muscle flexibility in men with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) with lumbar movement control impairment (MCI). Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 46 men suffering from NSLBP with lumbar MCI were selected and randomly divided into three groups (i.e., two exercise groups - one control group). Training intervention groups were allowed to perform exercises for 6 weeks, three sessions per week. Universal goniometer was used to measure the flexibility of hip muscles (i.e., hamstring, rectus femoris, external rotator, and tensor fasciae latae). Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to compare the effect and durability of the two training protocols on the dependent variables at a significant level. Results: The results showed that both training methods increased hamstring muscle flexibility (P=0.001). GPR method was found superior in increasing the flexibility of the right hip of the subjects in the post-test (P=0.032) and follow-up (P=0.024). However, no significant differences were observed in the other hip muscles flexibility. Conclusion: It was concluded that the GPR method, compared to the lumbar stabilization method, had a greater potential to increase the flexibility of shortened muscles by enhancing the contraction of the antagonist muscles to avoid postural asymmetry. It seems both training protocols were effective in improving hamstring muscle flexibility in people with NSLBP suffering from MCI and this result was observed after both training and 4 weeks of inactivity.","PeriodicalId":271947,"journal":{"name":"Hormozgan Medical Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hip Muscle Flexibility After Six Weeks of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises in Men With Movement Control Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"A. Rahmani, H. Minoonejad, F. Seidi, Yousef Moghadas Tabrizi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hmj.2022.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Exercise therapy is one of the most effective methods for dealing with low back pain. The present study aimed to compare to examine the effects of two protocols, i.e., six weeks of lumbar stability exercises (LSE) and global postural reeducation exercises (GPR), followed by a subsequent period of non-training on hip muscle flexibility in men with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) with lumbar movement control impairment (MCI). Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 46 men suffering from NSLBP with lumbar MCI were selected and randomly divided into three groups (i.e., two exercise groups - one control group). Training intervention groups were allowed to perform exercises for 6 weeks, three sessions per week. Universal goniometer was used to measure the flexibility of hip muscles (i.e., hamstring, rectus femoris, external rotator, and tensor fasciae latae). Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to compare the effect and durability of the two training protocols on the dependent variables at a significant level. Results: The results showed that both training methods increased hamstring muscle flexibility (P=0.001). GPR method was found superior in increasing the flexibility of the right hip of the subjects in the post-test (P=0.032) and follow-up (P=0.024). However, no significant differences were observed in the other hip muscles flexibility. Conclusion: It was concluded that the GPR method, compared to the lumbar stabilization method, had a greater potential to increase the flexibility of shortened muscles by enhancing the contraction of the antagonist muscles to avoid postural asymmetry. It seems both training protocols were effective in improving hamstring muscle flexibility in people with NSLBP suffering from MCI and this result was observed after both training and 4 weeks of inactivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormozgan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormozgan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hmj.2022.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormozgan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hmj.2022.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动疗法是治疗腰痛最有效的方法之一。本研究旨在比较两种方案的效果,即6周的腰椎稳定性锻炼(LSE)和整体姿势再教育锻炼(GPR),随后一段时间的非训练对患有慢性非特异性腰痛(NSLBP)和腰椎运动控制障碍(MCI)的男性髋关节肌肉灵活性的影响。方法:随机选择46例非slbp合并腰椎MCI的男性患者,随机分为3组(2个运动组1个对照组)。训练干预组被允许进行为期6周的锻炼,每周三次。使用通用角计测量髋部肌肉(即腘绳肌、股直肌、外旋肌和阔筋膜张肌)的柔韧性。采用重复测量方差分析在显著水平上比较两种训练方案对因变量的影响和持久性。结果:两种训练方法均能提高腘绳肌柔韧性(P=0.001)。GPR法在后测(P=0.032)和随访(P=0.024)中增加受试者右髋关节柔韧性的效果优于GPR法。然而,在其他臀部肌肉柔韧性方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:与腰椎稳定法相比,GPR法通过增强拮抗肌的收缩来避免体位不对称,更有可能增加短肌的柔韧性。两种训练方案似乎都能有效地改善患有轻度认知损伤的NSLBP患者的腘绳肌柔韧性,这一结果是在训练和4周不运动后观察到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hip Muscle Flexibility After Six Weeks of Lumbar Stabilization and Global Postural Reeducation Exercises in Men With Movement Control Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Exercise therapy is one of the most effective methods for dealing with low back pain. The present study aimed to compare to examine the effects of two protocols, i.e., six weeks of lumbar stability exercises (LSE) and global postural reeducation exercises (GPR), followed by a subsequent period of non-training on hip muscle flexibility in men with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) with lumbar movement control impairment (MCI). Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 46 men suffering from NSLBP with lumbar MCI were selected and randomly divided into three groups (i.e., two exercise groups - one control group). Training intervention groups were allowed to perform exercises for 6 weeks, three sessions per week. Universal goniometer was used to measure the flexibility of hip muscles (i.e., hamstring, rectus femoris, external rotator, and tensor fasciae latae). Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to compare the effect and durability of the two training protocols on the dependent variables at a significant level. Results: The results showed that both training methods increased hamstring muscle flexibility (P=0.001). GPR method was found superior in increasing the flexibility of the right hip of the subjects in the post-test (P=0.032) and follow-up (P=0.024). However, no significant differences were observed in the other hip muscles flexibility. Conclusion: It was concluded that the GPR method, compared to the lumbar stabilization method, had a greater potential to increase the flexibility of shortened muscles by enhancing the contraction of the antagonist muscles to avoid postural asymmetry. It seems both training protocols were effective in improving hamstring muscle flexibility in people with NSLBP suffering from MCI and this result was observed after both training and 4 weeks of inactivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Manifestations With Tissue Alterations of Nas or Pan Consumption: A Case Study in Bandar Abbas (Iran) in 2018 Evaluation of Birth Outcomes of Women Delivering at Home With Midwife Management Analysis of Malaria Situation in Jask County During the Implementation of the Elimination Programme in 2010-2020 The Risk of Exposure to Infectious Bacterial Bioaerosols in Different Hospital Wards: A Case Study Assessing the Level of Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance of Radiographers About Radiation Protection in Bandar Abbas, Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1