我们应该并且能够激励大学生吗?——浅析高校教师的角色解读与教学方法

Beatrix Fűzi
{"title":"我们应该并且能够激励大学生吗?——浅析高校教师的角色解读与教学方法","authors":"Beatrix Fűzi","doi":"10.20472/TEC.2019.007.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing student drop-out rates is a challenge faced in Hungarian higher education. Our research and development project is intended to contribute to this effort: we analyse the notions and experiences of teachers concerning the possibility of motivating students, as well as their own role models as teachers and their teaching methods. We also explore students? motivation, their experiences and expectations related to classes at the university.It was studied whether the motivation of students appears in the teachers? understanding of their own role. Do they accept or reject the motivation of students as a task? Is there a difference in the teaching methods applied between those who consider a part of their role as teachers to motivate students and those who reject this? We were also curious how the opinions of teachers and students were similar or different concerning the motivating effect of various teaching methods.We collected data from teachers and students at six Hungarian institutes of higher education. The teachers? questionnaire was completed by 210 respondents, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews were also conducted with 41 of them. The students? questionnaire was completed by 1,130 respondents. In the analysis of the data, we used both quantitative and qualitative methods.Based on the results, half of the teachers faced with difficulties in connection with motivating students. In the interpretation of the role models of the majority of them, the intention of motivating students appeared positively. By contrast, in the opinion of 68%, academic success depends on the students alone.There was agreement in that the respondents considered the use of digital tools, interactivity, practicality as having the most motivating effect. In the frequency of encountering various methods, however, there was a difference in the assessment given by students and teachers. The interviews shed light on the fact that, despite the best intentions, the actual achievement of motivation of students in the classrooms is often missing. The reason may be the lack of pedagogical and methodological knowledge and consciousness.","PeriodicalId":160765,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th Teaching & Education Conference, London","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHOULD WE AND CAN WE MOTIVATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS? – THE ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ROLE AND THE TEACHING METHODS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS\",\"authors\":\"Beatrix Fűzi\",\"doi\":\"10.20472/TEC.2019.007.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reducing student drop-out rates is a challenge faced in Hungarian higher education. Our research and development project is intended to contribute to this effort: we analyse the notions and experiences of teachers concerning the possibility of motivating students, as well as their own role models as teachers and their teaching methods. We also explore students? motivation, their experiences and expectations related to classes at the university.It was studied whether the motivation of students appears in the teachers? understanding of their own role. Do they accept or reject the motivation of students as a task? Is there a difference in the teaching methods applied between those who consider a part of their role as teachers to motivate students and those who reject this? We were also curious how the opinions of teachers and students were similar or different concerning the motivating effect of various teaching methods.We collected data from teachers and students at six Hungarian institutes of higher education. The teachers? questionnaire was completed by 210 respondents, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews were also conducted with 41 of them. The students? questionnaire was completed by 1,130 respondents. In the analysis of the data, we used both quantitative and qualitative methods.Based on the results, half of the teachers faced with difficulties in connection with motivating students. In the interpretation of the role models of the majority of them, the intention of motivating students appeared positively. By contrast, in the opinion of 68%, academic success depends on the students alone.There was agreement in that the respondents considered the use of digital tools, interactivity, practicality as having the most motivating effect. In the frequency of encountering various methods, however, there was a difference in the assessment given by students and teachers. The interviews shed light on the fact that, despite the best intentions, the actual achievement of motivation of students in the classrooms is often missing. The reason may be the lack of pedagogical and methodological knowledge and consciousness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th Teaching & Education Conference, London\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th Teaching & Education Conference, London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20472/TEC.2019.007.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th Teaching & Education Conference, London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20472/TEC.2019.007.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

降低学生辍学率是匈牙利高等教育面临的一项挑战。我们的研究和开发项目旨在为这一努力做出贡献:我们分析了教师关于激励学生的可能性的概念和经验,以及他们作为教师的榜样和他们的教学方法。我们也探索学生?动机,他们的经历和对大学课程的期望。研究学生的动机是否出现在教师身上?了解自己的角色。他们接受还是拒绝将学生的动机作为一项任务?那些把激励学生作为教师角色的一部分的教师和那些拒绝这样做的教师在教学方法上有什么不同吗?我们也很好奇,对于各种教学方法的激励效果,老师和学生的看法是相似的还是不同的。我们收集了匈牙利六所高等教育机构的教师和学生的数据。老师吗?210名受访者完成了问卷调查,并对其中41名受访者进行了半结构化的深度访谈。的学生吗?问卷共有1130名受访者完成。在对数据的分析中,我们采用了定量和定性相结合的方法。根据调查结果,半数教师在激励学生方面遇到困难。在大多数人对榜样的解读中,激励学生的意图是积极的。相比之下,68%的人认为学业成功完全取决于学生。受访者一致认为,数字工具的使用、互动性和实用性是最具激励作用的。然而,在遇到各种方法的频率上,学生和老师给出的评价存在差异。访谈揭示了这样一个事实,即尽管有最好的意图,学生在课堂上的动机的实际成就往往是缺失的。原因可能是缺乏教学和方法论知识和意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SHOULD WE AND CAN WE MOTIVATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS? – THE ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ROLE AND THE TEACHING METHODS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS
Reducing student drop-out rates is a challenge faced in Hungarian higher education. Our research and development project is intended to contribute to this effort: we analyse the notions and experiences of teachers concerning the possibility of motivating students, as well as their own role models as teachers and their teaching methods. We also explore students? motivation, their experiences and expectations related to classes at the university.It was studied whether the motivation of students appears in the teachers? understanding of their own role. Do they accept or reject the motivation of students as a task? Is there a difference in the teaching methods applied between those who consider a part of their role as teachers to motivate students and those who reject this? We were also curious how the opinions of teachers and students were similar or different concerning the motivating effect of various teaching methods.We collected data from teachers and students at six Hungarian institutes of higher education. The teachers? questionnaire was completed by 210 respondents, and semi-structured, in-depth interviews were also conducted with 41 of them. The students? questionnaire was completed by 1,130 respondents. In the analysis of the data, we used both quantitative and qualitative methods.Based on the results, half of the teachers faced with difficulties in connection with motivating students. In the interpretation of the role models of the majority of them, the intention of motivating students appeared positively. By contrast, in the opinion of 68%, academic success depends on the students alone.There was agreement in that the respondents considered the use of digital tools, interactivity, practicality as having the most motivating effect. In the frequency of encountering various methods, however, there was a difference in the assessment given by students and teachers. The interviews shed light on the fact that, despite the best intentions, the actual achievement of motivation of students in the classrooms is often missing. The reason may be the lack of pedagogical and methodological knowledge and consciousness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STUDENTS AS PARTNERS: ON DEVELOPING A STUDENT LED CONFERENCE TO ENHANCE THE SKILLS OF UG PROJECT STUDENTS ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION AMONG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN RELATION TO PEER PRESSURE EFFECT OF ACTIVE LEARNING INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES ON PRE-SERVICE CHEMISTRY TEACHERS ACQUISITION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS SHOULD WE AND CAN WE MOTIVATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS? – THE ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ROLE AND THE TEACHING METHODS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS ASSESSING THE COST OF FREE PRIMARY EDUCATION POLICY IN NIGERIA AND THE QUESTION OF SUSTAINABILITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1