{"title":"虚假的安全感(扩展摘要)","authors":"P. Bonatti","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2023/770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing literature on confidentiality in knowledge representation and reasoning sometimes may cause a false sense of security, due to lack of details about\n\nthe attacker, and some misconceptions about security-related concepts. This paper\n\nanalyzes the vulnerabilities of some recent knowledge protection methods to increase the awareness about their actual effectiveness and their mutual differences.","PeriodicalId":394530,"journal":{"name":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A False Sense of Security (Extended Abstract)\",\"authors\":\"P. Bonatti\",\"doi\":\"10.24963/ijcai.2023/770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The growing literature on confidentiality in knowledge representation and reasoning sometimes may cause a false sense of security, due to lack of details about\\n\\nthe attacker, and some misconceptions about security-related concepts. This paper\\n\\nanalyzes the vulnerabilities of some recent knowledge protection methods to increase the awareness about their actual effectiveness and their mutual differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The growing literature on confidentiality in knowledge representation and reasoning sometimes may cause a false sense of security, due to lack of details about
the attacker, and some misconceptions about security-related concepts. This paper
analyzes the vulnerabilities of some recent knowledge protection methods to increase the awareness about their actual effectiveness and their mutual differences.