可信相对同行评议:团队学习中评估个体的新方法

M. S. Patil, P. Desai, M. Vijayalakshmi, M. M. Raikar, Shivalingappa Battur, H. Parikshit, G. Joshi
{"title":"可信相对同行评议:团队学习中评估个体的新方法","authors":"M. S. Patil, P. Desai, M. Vijayalakshmi, M. M. Raikar, Shivalingappa Battur, H. Parikshit, G. Joshi","doi":"10.1109/MITE.2016.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major challenge of Team Based Learning (TBL) or Group learning is its Design and Implement that assess the student's knowledge and skills. The challenge also includes designing assessment to grade the students based on their contribution to the team performance. Teacher assessing the student's performance in team is a teacher biased process. Therefore Peer evaluation can be included as part of TBL assessment. Peer review is considered as transparent and efficient technique to assess individual in team. But it has also been criticized with respect to fairness. This paper proposes Trusted Relative Peer Review (TRPR) which reduces the disadvantages of peer review to greater extent. It includes two reviews i) Team's Guide review ii) Peer review. The trustworthiness of peer review is decided based correlation of Guides and Peer reviews, depending on which each student is rated relatively for 100 points. After comparisons of results, 65% student teams peer reviews were found to be not trustworthy, which are corrected through proposed TRPR. This review is accepted by 54-58% of students and trusted it. TRPR helped to measure \"ability to function in a team\" with attainment of 7.7 on the scale of 10. TRPR contributes to the success of TBL implementation in greater extent by overcoming the drawbacks of peer review. It influences individual student's marks based on their contributions. Therefore it ensures students contribute in group work resulting in students learning. Although TRPR is hectic, future work shall try to make it simple.","PeriodicalId":407003,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trusted Relative Peer Review: A Novel Approach to Assess an Individual in Team Based Learning\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Patil, P. Desai, M. Vijayalakshmi, M. M. Raikar, Shivalingappa Battur, H. Parikshit, G. Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MITE.2016.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The major challenge of Team Based Learning (TBL) or Group learning is its Design and Implement that assess the student's knowledge and skills. The challenge also includes designing assessment to grade the students based on their contribution to the team performance. Teacher assessing the student's performance in team is a teacher biased process. Therefore Peer evaluation can be included as part of TBL assessment. Peer review is considered as transparent and efficient technique to assess individual in team. But it has also been criticized with respect to fairness. This paper proposes Trusted Relative Peer Review (TRPR) which reduces the disadvantages of peer review to greater extent. It includes two reviews i) Team's Guide review ii) Peer review. The trustworthiness of peer review is decided based correlation of Guides and Peer reviews, depending on which each student is rated relatively for 100 points. After comparisons of results, 65% student teams peer reviews were found to be not trustworthy, which are corrected through proposed TRPR. This review is accepted by 54-58% of students and trusted it. TRPR helped to measure \\\"ability to function in a team\\\" with attainment of 7.7 on the scale of 10. TRPR contributes to the success of TBL implementation in greater extent by overcoming the drawbacks of peer review. It influences individual student's marks based on their contributions. Therefore it ensures students contribute in group work resulting in students learning. Although TRPR is hectic, future work shall try to make it simple.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2016.021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2016.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

基于团队的学习(TBL)或小组学习的主要挑战是其设计和实施,以评估学生的知识和技能。挑战还包括设计评估,根据学生对团队表现的贡献来给他们打分。教师评估学生在团队中的表现是一个教师偏见的过程。因此,同行评价可以作为TBL评估的一部分。同行评议被认为是评估团队中个人的一种透明、有效的技术。但在公平方面,它也受到了批评。本文提出了可信相对同行评审(Trusted Relative Peer Review, TRPR),在很大程度上减少了同行评审的缺点。它包括两种评审i)团队指南评审ii)同行评审。同行评议的可信度是根据指南和同行评议的相关性来决定的,根据这些相关性,每个学生的评分相对为100分。结果比较后,65%的学生团队同行评议不可信,并通过建议的TRPR进行纠正。这篇评论被54-58%的学生接受并信任。TRPR有助于衡量“在团队中发挥作用的能力”,在10分的范围内达到7.7分。TRPR通过克服同行评议的弊端,在更大程度上促进了TBL实施的成功。它根据每个学生的贡献来影响他们的分数。因此,它确保学生在小组工作中做出贡献,从而促进学生的学习。虽然TRPR是繁忙的,但未来的工作应尽量使其简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trusted Relative Peer Review: A Novel Approach to Assess an Individual in Team Based Learning
The major challenge of Team Based Learning (TBL) or Group learning is its Design and Implement that assess the student's knowledge and skills. The challenge also includes designing assessment to grade the students based on their contribution to the team performance. Teacher assessing the student's performance in team is a teacher biased process. Therefore Peer evaluation can be included as part of TBL assessment. Peer review is considered as transparent and efficient technique to assess individual in team. But it has also been criticized with respect to fairness. This paper proposes Trusted Relative Peer Review (TRPR) which reduces the disadvantages of peer review to greater extent. It includes two reviews i) Team's Guide review ii) Peer review. The trustworthiness of peer review is decided based correlation of Guides and Peer reviews, depending on which each student is rated relatively for 100 points. After comparisons of results, 65% student teams peer reviews were found to be not trustworthy, which are corrected through proposed TRPR. This review is accepted by 54-58% of students and trusted it. TRPR helped to measure "ability to function in a team" with attainment of 7.7 on the scale of 10. TRPR contributes to the success of TBL implementation in greater extent by overcoming the drawbacks of peer review. It influences individual student's marks based on their contributions. Therefore it ensures students contribute in group work resulting in students learning. Although TRPR is hectic, future work shall try to make it simple.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design Thinking Framework to Enhance Object Oriented Design and Problem Analysis Skill in Java Programming Laboratory: An Experience A Case Study on an Unrealized Truth of an Outcome Based Education and Corrective Strategies Transitional Learning Style Preferences and Its Factors in Newer Generation Engineering Students Efficient Assessment Methods for Improving the Programme Outcomes of Undergraduate - Information Technology Programme in India Effective and Active Learning in Classroom Teaching through Various Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1