帮我做晚餐!在协助人类制定行动计划时面临的挑战

G. Behnke, B. Leichtmann, P. Bercher, D. Höller, V. Nitsch, M. Baumann, Susanne Biundo-Stephan
{"title":"帮我做晚餐!在协助人类制定行动计划时面临的挑战","authors":"G. Behnke, B. Leichtmann, P. Bercher, D. Höller, V. Nitsch, M. Baumann, Susanne Biundo-Stephan","doi":"10.1109/ICCT42709.2017.9151907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A promising field of application for cognitive technical systems is individualised user assistance for complex tasks. Here, a companion system usually uses an AI planner to solve the underlying combinatorial problem. Often, the use of a bare black-box planning system is not sufficient to provide individualised assistance, but instead the user has to be able to control the process that generates the presented advice. Such an integration guarantees that the user will be satisfied with the assistance s/he is given, trust the advice more, and is thus more likely to follow it. In this paper, we provide a general theoretical view on this process, called mixed-initiative planning, and derive several research challenges from it.","PeriodicalId":132735,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Companion Technology (ICCT)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Help me make a dinner! Challenges when assisting humans in action planning\",\"authors\":\"G. Behnke, B. Leichtmann, P. Bercher, D. Höller, V. Nitsch, M. Baumann, Susanne Biundo-Stephan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCT42709.2017.9151907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A promising field of application for cognitive technical systems is individualised user assistance for complex tasks. Here, a companion system usually uses an AI planner to solve the underlying combinatorial problem. Often, the use of a bare black-box planning system is not sufficient to provide individualised assistance, but instead the user has to be able to control the process that generates the presented advice. Such an integration guarantees that the user will be satisfied with the assistance s/he is given, trust the advice more, and is thus more likely to follow it. In this paper, we provide a general theoretical view on this process, called mixed-initiative planning, and derive several research challenges from it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Companion Technology (ICCT)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Companion Technology (ICCT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT42709.2017.9151907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Companion Technology (ICCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT42709.2017.9151907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

认知技术系统的一个有前景的应用领域是复杂任务的个性化用户协助。在这里,同伴系统通常使用AI计划器来解决潜在的组合问题。通常,使用一个简单的黑盒计划系统不足以提供个性化的帮助,相反,用户必须能够控制产生所提供建议的过程。这样的整合保证了用户会对所提供的帮助感到满意,更加信任建议,从而更有可能遵循建议。在本文中,我们对这一过程提供了一个一般的理论观点,称为混合主动规划,并从中得出了几个研究挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Help me make a dinner! Challenges when assisting humans in action planning
A promising field of application for cognitive technical systems is individualised user assistance for complex tasks. Here, a companion system usually uses an AI planner to solve the underlying combinatorial problem. Often, the use of a bare black-box planning system is not sufficient to provide individualised assistance, but instead the user has to be able to control the process that generates the presented advice. Such an integration guarantees that the user will be satisfied with the assistance s/he is given, trust the advice more, and is thus more likely to follow it. In this paper, we provide a general theoretical view on this process, called mixed-initiative planning, and derive several research challenges from it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accelerating manual annotation of filled pauses by automatic pre-selection Dialogues with IoT companions: Enabling human interaction with intelligent service items Adaptive dynamic network architectures for companion systems Sloth — The interactive workout planner Multimodal fusion including camera photoplethysmography for pain recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1