【肿瘤患者的重症监护】。

Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1992-10-01
S W Sahm
{"title":"【肿瘤患者的重症监护】。","authors":"S W Sahm","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no substantial difference in the prognosis of cancer patients after intensive care compared to certain other groups of patients except for the tumor patient with major respiratory problems. Hence, the general refusal of intensive care for cancer patients is not justified. Rather indication for intensive care needs careful examination of several aspects including medical science and ethics. Particular ethical problems arising in intensive care for cancer patients can be reduced by open communication between the medical team and the patient as well as between the medical specialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 8","pages":"L-LI"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intensive care of tumor patients].\",\"authors\":\"S W Sahm\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is no substantial difference in the prognosis of cancer patients after intensive care compared to certain other groups of patients except for the tumor patient with major respiratory problems. Hence, the general refusal of intensive care for cancer patients is not justified. Rather indication for intensive care needs careful examination of several aspects including medical science and ethics. Particular ethical problems arising in intensive care for cancer patients can be reduced by open communication between the medical team and the patient as well as between the medical specialists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"L-LI\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除有严重呼吸系统疾病的肿瘤患者外,癌症患者重症监护后的预后与其他某些组患者相比无显著差异。因此,普遍拒绝对癌症患者进行重症监护是不合理的。相反,重症监护的指示需要仔细检查几个方面,包括医学和伦理。通过医疗团队与患者以及医学专家之间的公开沟通,可以减少癌症患者重症监护中出现的特殊伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Intensive care of tumor patients].

There is no substantial difference in the prognosis of cancer patients after intensive care compared to certain other groups of patients except for the tumor patient with major respiratory problems. Hence, the general refusal of intensive care for cancer patients is not justified. Rather indication for intensive care needs careful examination of several aspects including medical science and ethics. Particular ethical problems arising in intensive care for cancer patients can be reduced by open communication between the medical team and the patient as well as between the medical specialists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Brief definitions of concepts in medical ethics. 33. Assisted suicide--the problem of the "double effect"]. [Restriction of ethics in medicine]. [Somatic gene therapy--aspects from theological discussion]. [The human embryo as a teleologically defined entity]. [Bioethics in Hong Kong--between morals and economics].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1