埃斯皮诺萨的埃米利奥·拉莫。julian Besteiro的政治和哲学。马德里:编辑Cuadernos para el Dialago, 1973。

D. Vélez
{"title":"埃斯皮诺萨的埃米利奥·拉莫。julian Besteiro的政治和哲学。马德里:编辑Cuadernos para el Dialago, 1973。","authors":"D. Vélez","doi":"10.1017/S0097852300015951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Germany. Middle class feminists suffered from the timidities inherent in German liberalism itself. The feminist platform advocated by socialists embraced the whole of economic, social and political life. It included women's vote, protective labor laws and an extensive maternity insurance for all women, municipal reforms to relieve women's domestic burdens such as communal eating and laundry services and day care centers, equal pay for equal work, educational reform to improve women's employment opportunities and reform of marriage law to promote equality between husbands and wives. Characteristic of socialist feminism, however, was its compatibility with the requirements of the class struggle as radical leaders, i.e., Zetkin, understood it. Reforms geared to ameliorating women's position which the leadership perceived as incompatible with the class struggle were rejected. The alliance of socialism and feminism restricted feminist options. The Dornemann biography omits a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the feminist tactics in the Social Democratic and later Communist movements. Many questions remain unexplored: the degree to which socialist women harmonized loyalty to class and to sex; feminist calculations which conditioned the Women's Movement's organizational and mobilization tactics; the extent to which Marxist ideology dampened specifically feminist offenses, and the presence of male antifeminism in the organized working class. An English biography of Clara Zetkin currently being prepared by Karen Honeycutt at Columbia University promises to answer these and similar questions more fully.","PeriodicalId":363865,"journal":{"name":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emilio Lamo de Espinosa. Política y Filosofia en Julián Besteiro . Madrid: Editorial Cuadernos para el Dialago, 1973.\",\"authors\":\"D. Vélez\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0097852300015951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Germany. Middle class feminists suffered from the timidities inherent in German liberalism itself. The feminist platform advocated by socialists embraced the whole of economic, social and political life. It included women's vote, protective labor laws and an extensive maternity insurance for all women, municipal reforms to relieve women's domestic burdens such as communal eating and laundry services and day care centers, equal pay for equal work, educational reform to improve women's employment opportunities and reform of marriage law to promote equality between husbands and wives. Characteristic of socialist feminism, however, was its compatibility with the requirements of the class struggle as radical leaders, i.e., Zetkin, understood it. Reforms geared to ameliorating women's position which the leadership perceived as incompatible with the class struggle were rejected. The alliance of socialism and feminism restricted feminist options. The Dornemann biography omits a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the feminist tactics in the Social Democratic and later Communist movements. Many questions remain unexplored: the degree to which socialist women harmonized loyalty to class and to sex; feminist calculations which conditioned the Women's Movement's organizational and mobilization tactics; the extent to which Marxist ideology dampened specifically feminist offenses, and the presence of male antifeminism in the organized working class. An English biography of Clara Zetkin currently being prepared by Karen Honeycutt at Columbia University promises to answer these and similar questions more fully.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300015951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300015951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国。中产阶级女权主义者饱受德国自由主义固有的胆怯之苦。社会主义者倡导的女权主义纲领涵盖了整个经济、社会和政治生活。其中包括妇女选举权、保护劳工法和对所有妇女的广泛生育保险、市政改革以减轻妇女的家庭负担,如公共饮食和洗衣服务以及日托中心、同工同酬、教育改革以改善妇女的就业机会和改革婚姻法以促进夫妻平等。然而,社会主义女权主义的特点是,它符合激进领袖蔡特金所理解的阶级斗争的要求。旨在改善妇女地位的改革被领导层认为与阶级斗争不相容,因此遭到拒绝。社会主义和女权主义的联合限制了女权主义的选择。多内曼的传记忽略了对社会民主党和后来的共产主义运动中女权主义策略的优缺点的批判性评估。许多问题仍未得到解决:社会主义女性在多大程度上协调了对阶级和性别的忠诚;女权主义者的考量决定了妇女运动的组织和动员策略;马克思主义意识形态在多大程度上抑制了女权主义的冒犯,以及有组织的工人阶级中男性反女权主义的存在。目前,哥伦比亚大学的卡伦•霍尼卡特(Karen Honeycutt)正在撰写一本克拉拉•蔡特金(Clara Zetkin)的英文传记,有望更全面地回答这些问题和类似的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emilio Lamo de Espinosa. Política y Filosofia en Julián Besteiro . Madrid: Editorial Cuadernos para el Dialago, 1973.
Germany. Middle class feminists suffered from the timidities inherent in German liberalism itself. The feminist platform advocated by socialists embraced the whole of economic, social and political life. It included women's vote, protective labor laws and an extensive maternity insurance for all women, municipal reforms to relieve women's domestic burdens such as communal eating and laundry services and day care centers, equal pay for equal work, educational reform to improve women's employment opportunities and reform of marriage law to promote equality between husbands and wives. Characteristic of socialist feminism, however, was its compatibility with the requirements of the class struggle as radical leaders, i.e., Zetkin, understood it. Reforms geared to ameliorating women's position which the leadership perceived as incompatible with the class struggle were rejected. The alliance of socialism and feminism restricted feminist options. The Dornemann biography omits a critical assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the feminist tactics in the Social Democratic and later Communist movements. Many questions remain unexplored: the degree to which socialist women harmonized loyalty to class and to sex; feminist calculations which conditioned the Women's Movement's organizational and mobilization tactics; the extent to which Marxist ideology dampened specifically feminist offenses, and the presence of male antifeminism in the organized working class. An English biography of Clara Zetkin currently being prepared by Karen Honeycutt at Columbia University promises to answer these and similar questions more fully.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bronterre O'Brien's Correspondence with Thomas Allsop: New Evidence on the Decline of a Chartist Leader John H. M. Laslett and Seymour Martin Upset, eds., Failure of a Dream ? Essays in the History of American Socialism (Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1974) Bronterre O'Brien's Correspondence with Thomas Allsop: New Evidence on the Decline of a Chartist Leader Revolutionary and Counter-Revolutionary Thought in Habsburg Hungary, 1914–1918 International Approaches to the Study of Labor History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1