导言:下一波东扩:2004年后的欧盟和东南欧

G. Timmins, D. Jović
{"title":"导言:下一波东扩:2004年后的欧盟和东南欧","authors":"G. Timmins, D. Jović","doi":"10.1080/14613190600595408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The completion of the Central and Eastern European accession process into the European Union (EU) in 2004 can in broad terms be taken to have been a considerable success in generating an enlarged European zone of peace and stability. But the experience of post-communist transformation within this region is in stark contrast to that in Southeast Europe where the collapse of the Yugoslav Federation at the end of the cold war unleashed a bloody and devastating conflict which necessitated the military engagement of the international community and culminated in a NATO-led military intervention into Kosovo in 1999. Although the EU has aspirations to develop a military dimension to its external identity, its international presence continues to be articulated predominantly through soft power, for example, diplomatic, economic and normative foreign policy instruments. The next wave of EU enlargement—if and when it happens— therefore represents a crucial contribution both to the continued creation of a stable European Order and the credibility of the EU as an effective international actor. The then still European Community (EC) had demonstrated a high degree of misplaced confidence at the start of the 1990s in relation to responsibility for managing the emerging crisis in the Balkans when Jacques Poos, the Luxembourg Foreign Minister speaking on behalf of the European Council Presidency, announced in 1991 that ‘the hour of Europe has dawned’. This statement had come at a time when the EC was negotiating the Treaty on European Union and which would lead to the creation of a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). By the end of the decade and in light of Kosovo, the EU’s ability to manage conflict in its own backyard had been exposed as a myth and Europe’s continued reliance upon a US military presence was clear for all to see. Lessons have been learned. The European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) established at the Cologne European Council summit in June 1999 acknowledged the need to develop an autonomous military capacity to support its international presence and the policy of common strategies agreed two years previously at the Amsterdam European Council summit in June 1997 recognised the need for greater coherence in EU foreign policy statements and the behaviour which flowed from them. The creation of a High Representative for the CFSP in 1999 as a means of coordinating the foreign policy positions of member states was a further step forward in this direction as was the European Security Strategy","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: The Next Wave of Enlargement: The European Union and Southeast Europe after 2004\",\"authors\":\"G. Timmins, D. Jović\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613190600595408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The completion of the Central and Eastern European accession process into the European Union (EU) in 2004 can in broad terms be taken to have been a considerable success in generating an enlarged European zone of peace and stability. But the experience of post-communist transformation within this region is in stark contrast to that in Southeast Europe where the collapse of the Yugoslav Federation at the end of the cold war unleashed a bloody and devastating conflict which necessitated the military engagement of the international community and culminated in a NATO-led military intervention into Kosovo in 1999. Although the EU has aspirations to develop a military dimension to its external identity, its international presence continues to be articulated predominantly through soft power, for example, diplomatic, economic and normative foreign policy instruments. The next wave of EU enlargement—if and when it happens— therefore represents a crucial contribution both to the continued creation of a stable European Order and the credibility of the EU as an effective international actor. The then still European Community (EC) had demonstrated a high degree of misplaced confidence at the start of the 1990s in relation to responsibility for managing the emerging crisis in the Balkans when Jacques Poos, the Luxembourg Foreign Minister speaking on behalf of the European Council Presidency, announced in 1991 that ‘the hour of Europe has dawned’. This statement had come at a time when the EC was negotiating the Treaty on European Union and which would lead to the creation of a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). By the end of the decade and in light of Kosovo, the EU’s ability to manage conflict in its own backyard had been exposed as a myth and Europe’s continued reliance upon a US military presence was clear for all to see. Lessons have been learned. The European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) established at the Cologne European Council summit in June 1999 acknowledged the need to develop an autonomous military capacity to support its international presence and the policy of common strategies agreed two years previously at the Amsterdam European Council summit in June 1997 recognised the need for greater coherence in EU foreign policy statements and the behaviour which flowed from them. The creation of a High Representative for the CFSP in 1999 as a means of coordinating the foreign policy positions of member states was a further step forward in this direction as was the European Security Strategy\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600595408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600595408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

中欧和东欧在2004年完成加入欧洲联盟(欧盟)的进程,从广义上讲,可以被视为在建立一个扩大的欧洲和平与稳定区方面取得了相当大的成功。但是,该地区后共产主义转型的经验与东南欧形成鲜明对比,在东南欧,冷战结束时南斯拉夫联邦的崩溃引发了一场血腥和毁灭性的冲突,使国际社会必须进行军事介入,并以1999年北约领导的对科索沃的军事干预告终。尽管欧盟渴望在其外部身份中发展军事层面,但其国际存在仍然主要通过软实力来表达,例如外交、经济和规范的外交政策工具。因此,下一波欧盟扩大——如果发生的话——将对继续建立稳定的欧洲秩序和提高欧盟作为有效国际角色的可信度做出关键贡献。在20世纪90年代初,当卢森堡外交部长雅克·普斯代表欧洲理事会主席发表讲话时,当时仍然存在的欧洲共同体(EC)表现出高度错位的信心,认为它有责任管理巴尔干地区正在出现的危机,1991年,他宣布“欧洲的时刻已经到来”。这一声明是在欧共体就《欧洲联盟条约》进行谈判的时候发表的,该条约将导致建立共同外交和安全政策。到20世纪90年代末,鉴于科索沃问题,欧盟在自己后院处理冲突的能力已被暴露为一个神话,欧洲对美国军事存在的持续依赖是有目共睹的。我们已经吸取了教训。1999年6月在科隆欧洲理事会首脑会议上制定的欧洲安全与防务政策(ESDP)承认有必要发展自主的军事能力来支持其国际存在,两年前在1997年6月阿姆斯特丹欧洲理事会首脑会议上商定的共同战略政策认识到欧盟外交政策声明和由此产生的行为需要更大的一致性。1999年设立了欧洲安全与安全政策高级代表,作为协调成员国外交政策立场的手段,这是朝着这个方向迈出的又一步,《欧洲安全战略》也是如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction: The Next Wave of Enlargement: The European Union and Southeast Europe after 2004
The completion of the Central and Eastern European accession process into the European Union (EU) in 2004 can in broad terms be taken to have been a considerable success in generating an enlarged European zone of peace and stability. But the experience of post-communist transformation within this region is in stark contrast to that in Southeast Europe where the collapse of the Yugoslav Federation at the end of the cold war unleashed a bloody and devastating conflict which necessitated the military engagement of the international community and culminated in a NATO-led military intervention into Kosovo in 1999. Although the EU has aspirations to develop a military dimension to its external identity, its international presence continues to be articulated predominantly through soft power, for example, diplomatic, economic and normative foreign policy instruments. The next wave of EU enlargement—if and when it happens— therefore represents a crucial contribution both to the continued creation of a stable European Order and the credibility of the EU as an effective international actor. The then still European Community (EC) had demonstrated a high degree of misplaced confidence at the start of the 1990s in relation to responsibility for managing the emerging crisis in the Balkans when Jacques Poos, the Luxembourg Foreign Minister speaking on behalf of the European Council Presidency, announced in 1991 that ‘the hour of Europe has dawned’. This statement had come at a time when the EC was negotiating the Treaty on European Union and which would lead to the creation of a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). By the end of the decade and in light of Kosovo, the EU’s ability to manage conflict in its own backyard had been exposed as a myth and Europe’s continued reliance upon a US military presence was clear for all to see. Lessons have been learned. The European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) established at the Cologne European Council summit in June 1999 acknowledged the need to develop an autonomous military capacity to support its international presence and the policy of common strategies agreed two years previously at the Amsterdam European Council summit in June 1997 recognised the need for greater coherence in EU foreign policy statements and the behaviour which flowed from them. The creation of a High Representative for the CFSP in 1999 as a means of coordinating the foreign policy positions of member states was a further step forward in this direction as was the European Security Strategy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1