“史塔克乌托邦”中的福利与惩罚(1979-2015)

Welfare and Punishment Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI:10.2307/j.ctv1g13jv9.6

I. Cummins

{"title":"“史塔克乌托邦”中的福利与惩罚(1979-2015)","authors":"I. Cummins","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1g13jv9.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polanyi (1957) described the notion of a self-regulating global system a “stark Utopia.” This chapter uses this as a starting point to examine the broad themes in the development of welfare and penal policy in a period dominated by free market economics Fukuyama (1992) presents the triumph of free market economics as an inevitable conclusion of trends in human history. It is also presented as the final stage development has ceased or is complete. Polanyi’s analysis is presented a counterpoint to this analysis. Polanyi asserts the primacy of politics. Thus, it is impossible to separate economic and political development. Prosperity of the post war period can thus be viewed as a direct result of the advances in politics and civil society that occurred in the period.","PeriodicalId":136892,"journal":{"name":"Welfare and Punishment","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welfare and Punishment in a ‘Stark Utopia’ (1979–2015)\",\"authors\":\"I. Cummins\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1g13jv9.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polanyi (1957) described the notion of a self-regulating global system a “stark Utopia.” This chapter uses this as a starting point to examine the broad themes in the development of welfare and penal policy in a period dominated by free market economics Fukuyama (1992) presents the triumph of free market economics as an inevitable conclusion of trends in human history. It is also presented as the final stage development has ceased or is complete. Polanyi’s analysis is presented a counterpoint to this analysis. Polanyi asserts the primacy of politics. Thus, it is impossible to separate economic and political development. Prosperity of the post war period can thus be viewed as a direct result of the advances in politics and civil society that occurred in the period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welfare and Punishment\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welfare and Punishment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1g13jv9.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welfare and Punishment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1g13jv9.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

波兰尼(1957)将自我调节的全球体系的概念描述为“赤裸裸的乌托邦”。本章以此为起点，考察自由市场经济主导时期福利和刑罚政策发展的广泛主题。福山(1992)将自由市场经济的胜利视为人类历史趋势的必然结论。它也被表示为发展已经停止或完成的最后阶段。波兰尼的分析与这一分析相对应。波兰尼主张政治的首要地位。因此，不可能把经济发展和政治发展分开。因此，战后时期的繁荣可以看作是这一时期政治和公民社会进步的直接结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Welfare and Punishment in a ‘Stark Utopia’ (1979–2015)

Polanyi (1957) described the notion of a self-regulating global system a “stark Utopia.” This chapter uses this as a starting point to examine the broad themes in the development of welfare and penal policy in a period dominated by free market economics Fukuyama (1992) presents the triumph of free market economics as an inevitable conclusion of trends in human history. It is also presented as the final stage development has ceased or is complete. Polanyi’s analysis is presented a counterpoint to this analysis. Polanyi asserts the primacy of politics. Thus, it is impossible to separate economic and political development. Prosperity of the post war period can thus be viewed as a direct result of the advances in politics and civil society that occurred in the period.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助