欧盟法院的多个时代

Anthony Arnull
{"title":"欧盟法院的多个时代","authors":"Anthony Arnull","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198871477.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From its origins in the Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950, the Court of Justice of the European Union has developed into a legal leviathan, exercising a profound influence on the Union through its widely studied case law. That case law has been lauded and criticized in equal measure. Some see it as bold and ingenious, while others consider it the product of a rogue court. Who were the individuals who made the early Court tick? What were the obstacles the Court had to overcome in order to achieve its current status? Why were the Member States slow to grasp the significance of the Court’s work? What is the relationship between the Court and the General Court, created by the Council in 1988 to alleviate the pressure imposed on the Court itself by its growing case load? This chapter addresses these questions in their temporal, political, and geopolitical context.","PeriodicalId":176122,"journal":{"name":"New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice","volume":"AES-16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Many Ages of the Court of Justice of the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Arnull\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198871477.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From its origins in the Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950, the Court of Justice of the European Union has developed into a legal leviathan, exercising a profound influence on the Union through its widely studied case law. That case law has been lauded and criticized in equal measure. Some see it as bold and ingenious, while others consider it the product of a rogue court. Who were the individuals who made the early Court tick? What were the obstacles the Court had to overcome in order to achieve its current status? Why were the Member States slow to grasp the significance of the Court’s work? What is the relationship between the Court and the General Court, created by the Council in 1988 to alleviate the pressure imposed on the Court itself by its growing case load? This chapter addresses these questions in their temporal, political, and geopolitical context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice\",\"volume\":\"AES-16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871477.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871477.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲联盟法院起源于1950年5月9日的《舒曼宣言》,现已发展成为法律上的庞然大物,通过其广泛研究的判例法对欧盟产生深远影响。这一判例法受到了同等程度的赞扬和批评。一些人认为这是大胆而巧妙的,而另一些人则认为这是流氓法庭的产物。是谁让早期的最高法院运转起来的?法院为了达到目前的地位必须克服哪些障碍?为什么各会员国迟迟不能理解法院工作的意义?法院与普通法院之间的关系如何?该法院于1988年由理事会设立,目的是减轻法院本身因案件日益增多而承受的压力。本章在时间、政治和地缘政治背景下讨论这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Many Ages of the Court of Justice of the European Union
From its origins in the Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950, the Court of Justice of the European Union has developed into a legal leviathan, exercising a profound influence on the Union through its widely studied case law. That case law has been lauded and criticized in equal measure. Some see it as bold and ingenious, while others consider it the product of a rogue court. Who were the individuals who made the early Court tick? What were the obstacles the Court had to overcome in order to achieve its current status? Why were the Member States slow to grasp the significance of the Court’s work? What is the relationship between the Court and the General Court, created by the Council in 1988 to alleviate the pressure imposed on the Court itself by its growing case load? This chapter addresses these questions in their temporal, political, and geopolitical context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relevance of the Network Approach to European Case Law Judicial Legitimacy in the European Union The Many Ages of the Court of Justice of the European Union From Close-Ups to Long Shot Waiting for the Barbarians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1