在工程课上使用草稿评审来提高写作和思考能力

B. Olds
{"title":"在工程课上使用草稿评审来提高写作和思考能力","authors":"B. Olds","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1994.580648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although faculty-student conferencing on papers and reports is common practice in composition classes, many engineering faculty are reluctant to try it. This paper describes the draft review conferencing process developed in the chemical engineering unit operations field session at the Colorado School of Mines. Since draft reviews were introduced, engineering faculty report improvement in students' writing skills, a dramatic decrease in the amount of time required to grade final reports, and far less frustration with the organisation and technical content of student reports. Students are very satisfied with the draft reviews as well, many of them describing the process as the 'best' aspect of their field session. In this paper the author describes the genesis and implementation of their draft review process, provides an example of such a review, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using draft reviews in engineering classes.","PeriodicalId":288591,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using draft reviews to improve writing and thinking in engineering classes\",\"authors\":\"B. Olds\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1994.580648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although faculty-student conferencing on papers and reports is common practice in composition classes, many engineering faculty are reluctant to try it. This paper describes the draft review conferencing process developed in the chemical engineering unit operations field session at the Colorado School of Mines. Since draft reviews were introduced, engineering faculty report improvement in students' writing skills, a dramatic decrease in the amount of time required to grade final reports, and far less frustration with the organisation and technical content of student reports. Students are very satisfied with the draft reviews as well, many of them describing the process as the 'best' aspect of their field session. In this paper the author describes the genesis and implementation of their draft review process, provides an example of such a review, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using draft reviews in engineering classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.580648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1994.580648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管在作文课上,师生就论文和报告进行会议是一种常见的做法,但许多工程学院的教师不愿尝试。本文描述了在科罗拉多矿业学院化学工程单元操作现场会议中开发的审查会议草案过程。自从引入草稿审查制度以来,工程学院的学生报告说,他们的写作技巧得到了提高,最终报告评分所需的时间大大减少,学生报告的组织和技术内容也大大减少了挫折感。学生们对初稿审查也非常满意,他们中的许多人将这个过程描述为他们实地学习的“最佳”方面。在本文中,作者描述了他们的草案审查过程的起源和实现,提供了一个这样的审查的例子,并讨论了在工程类中使用草案审查的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using draft reviews to improve writing and thinking in engineering classes
Although faculty-student conferencing on papers and reports is common practice in composition classes, many engineering faculty are reluctant to try it. This paper describes the draft review conferencing process developed in the chemical engineering unit operations field session at the Colorado School of Mines. Since draft reviews were introduced, engineering faculty report improvement in students' writing skills, a dramatic decrease in the amount of time required to grade final reports, and far less frustration with the organisation and technical content of student reports. Students are very satisfied with the draft reviews as well, many of them describing the process as the 'best' aspect of their field session. In this paper the author describes the genesis and implementation of their draft review process, provides an example of such a review, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using draft reviews in engineering classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using local area networks to improve learning efficiency Progress report on the computers in manufacturing engineering knowledge thread The International Faculty of Engineering: an English-based global perspective in the heart of Central Europe Creating a smooth transition between the classroom and laboratory via computer simulation The optical engineering curriculum at CSUS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1