短期可靠性事前与事后管理方法的比较

J. Arce, F. Garces, M. Ilić
{"title":"短期可靠性事前与事后管理方法的比较","authors":"J. Arce, F. Garces, M. Ilić","doi":"10.1109/PESW.2002.985112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare the performance of two proposed methods for managing short-term reliability. First, we review the short-term reliability related risks associated with the possibility of transmission failures, which are measured through the probability of several scenarios and the respective consequences on some market participants. The load curtailment is used to evaluate the impact of failures on the customers. Second, we discuss two proposed methods for market-based reserve allocation, an ex-ante and an ex-post considering explicitly reliability requirements specified by the demand. Finally, we compare both methods in a test system where we show that they allocate reserve fulfilling pre-specified reliability requirements. The difference is in the amount of reserve allocated but not in the reliability level obtained. Moreover, the two methods differ with regard to stability of the electricity prices in presence of contingencies and the cost associated with different amounts of reserve.","PeriodicalId":198760,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the ex-ante and ex-post methods for short-term reliability management\",\"authors\":\"J. Arce, F. Garces, M. Ilić\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PESW.2002.985112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we compare the performance of two proposed methods for managing short-term reliability. First, we review the short-term reliability related risks associated with the possibility of transmission failures, which are measured through the probability of several scenarios and the respective consequences on some market participants. The load curtailment is used to evaluate the impact of failures on the customers. Second, we discuss two proposed methods for market-based reserve allocation, an ex-ante and an ex-post considering explicitly reliability requirements specified by the demand. Finally, we compare both methods in a test system where we show that they allocate reserve fulfilling pre-specified reliability requirements. The difference is in the amount of reserve allocated but not in the reliability level obtained. Moreover, the two methods differ with regard to stability of the electricity prices in presence of contingencies and the cost associated with different amounts of reserve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESW.2002.985112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESW.2002.985112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了两种提出的短期可靠性管理方法的性能。首先,我们回顾了与传输故障可能性相关的短期可靠性相关风险,这些风险是通过几种情况的概率和对一些市场参与者的各自后果来衡量的。负荷缩减用于评估故障对用户的影响。其次,我们讨论了两种基于市场的储备分配方法,即事前和事后考虑需求明确规定的可靠性要求的方法。最后,我们在测试系统中比较了这两种方法,我们表明它们分配的储备满足预先指定的可靠性要求。差异在于分配的储备数量,而不是获得的可靠性水平。此外,这两种方法在存在突发事件时电价的稳定性和与不同储备数量相关的成本方面有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the ex-ante and ex-post methods for short-term reliability management
In this paper we compare the performance of two proposed methods for managing short-term reliability. First, we review the short-term reliability related risks associated with the possibility of transmission failures, which are measured through the probability of several scenarios and the respective consequences on some market participants. The load curtailment is used to evaluate the impact of failures on the customers. Second, we discuss two proposed methods for market-based reserve allocation, an ex-ante and an ex-post considering explicitly reliability requirements specified by the demand. Finally, we compare both methods in a test system where we show that they allocate reserve fulfilling pre-specified reliability requirements. The difference is in the amount of reserve allocated but not in the reliability level obtained. Moreover, the two methods differ with regard to stability of the electricity prices in presence of contingencies and the cost associated with different amounts of reserve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decentralized nonlinear stabilizing control using state-space linearization Technologies supporting one stop shopping under E-tagging 1.7 and beyond Design of nonlinear separation controller based on heat relation for evaporator in STEC plant Dual configuration, dual setting, digital power system stabilizer-simulation and tuning experience at Manitoba Hydro Innovative developments in load as a reliability resource
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1