Kathleen Hertz Rupley, Darrell Brown, Scott Marshall
{"title":"企业社会责任报告的演变:从独立的企业社会责任报告到综合报告","authors":"Kathleen Hertz Rupley, Darrell Brown, Scott Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Both financial and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting are bound by global constraints. A common trait among the reporting systems is a growing movement toward comparability and accountability. Global pressures initially motivated the push toward stand-alone CSR reporting and now toward integrated reporting. Integrated reports (IR) include financial, economic, governance, and social information in one report. In the United States, integrated reporting is voluntary and only a small number of companies have issued IRs to date. This report provides a history of CSR reporting and then examines whether the <em>non-financial</em> economic, governance and social indicators identified in prior literature as being of interest to retail investors (Cohen et al. 2011) are disclosed in the pioneering U.S. IRs. Descriptive results indicate the initial IRs cover predominately indicators of economic and social performance with little focus on governance. Further analysis indicates that the IRs examined do not, as a rule, provide the information most highly desired by investors (i.e. market share, executive compensation, and product safety). This study provides a baseline for companies preparing IRs and for regulators (i.e. SEC, FASB) in the context of determining future disclosure regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"29 2","pages":"Pages 172-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.010","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of corporate reporting: From stand-alone corporate social responsibility reporting to integrated reporting\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Hertz Rupley, Darrell Brown, Scott Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Both financial and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting are bound by global constraints. A common trait among the reporting systems is a growing movement toward comparability and accountability. Global pressures initially motivated the push toward stand-alone CSR reporting and now toward integrated reporting. Integrated reports (IR) include financial, economic, governance, and social information in one report. In the United States, integrated reporting is voluntary and only a small number of companies have issued IRs to date. This report provides a history of CSR reporting and then examines whether the <em>non-financial</em> economic, governance and social indicators identified in prior literature as being of interest to retail investors (Cohen et al. 2011) are disclosed in the pioneering U.S. IRs. Descriptive results indicate the initial IRs cover predominately indicators of economic and social performance with little focus on governance. Further analysis indicates that the IRs examined do not, as a rule, provide the information most highly desired by investors (i.e. market share, executive compensation, and product safety). This study provides a baseline for companies preparing IRs and for regulators (i.e. SEC, FASB) in the context of determining future disclosure regulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 172-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.010\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045717300383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045717300383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63
摘要
财务和企业社会责任(CSR)报告都受到全球约束。报告制度的一个共同特点是越来越趋向于可比性和问责制。全球压力最初促使企业推动独立的CSR报告,现在则转向综合报告。综合报告(IR)在一个报告中包含金融、经济、治理和社会信息。在美国,综合报告是自愿的,迄今为止只有少数公司发布了内部报告。本报告提供了企业社会责任报告的历史,然后检查了先前文献中确定的散户投资者感兴趣的非金融经济、治理和社会指标(Cohen et al. 2011)是否在开创性的美国IRs中披露。描述性结果表明,最初的IRs主要涵盖经济和社会绩效指标,很少关注治理。进一步的分析表明,作为一种规则,所审查的内部审计师并没有提供投资者最想要的信息(即市场份额、高管薪酬和产品安全)。本研究为准备IRs的公司和监管机构(即SEC, FASB)在确定未来披露法规的背景下提供了基线。
Evolution of corporate reporting: From stand-alone corporate social responsibility reporting to integrated reporting
Both financial and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting are bound by global constraints. A common trait among the reporting systems is a growing movement toward comparability and accountability. Global pressures initially motivated the push toward stand-alone CSR reporting and now toward integrated reporting. Integrated reports (IR) include financial, economic, governance, and social information in one report. In the United States, integrated reporting is voluntary and only a small number of companies have issued IRs to date. This report provides a history of CSR reporting and then examines whether the non-financial economic, governance and social indicators identified in prior literature as being of interest to retail investors (Cohen et al. 2011) are disclosed in the pioneering U.S. IRs. Descriptive results indicate the initial IRs cover predominately indicators of economic and social performance with little focus on governance. Further analysis indicates that the IRs examined do not, as a rule, provide the information most highly desired by investors (i.e. market share, executive compensation, and product safety). This study provides a baseline for companies preparing IRs and for regulators (i.e. SEC, FASB) in the context of determining future disclosure regulations.