大型电力系统中的级联:静态与时域仿真的基准测试

E. Ciapessoni, D. Cirio, A. Pitto
{"title":"大型电力系统中的级联:静态与时域仿真的基准测试","authors":"E. Ciapessoni, D. Cirio, A. Pitto","doi":"10.1109/PESGM.2014.6939469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cascading stems from the interaction between control, protection, and defense systems, and it is affected by uncertainties in system models and external factors. An evaluation of cascading thus requires the collection of exhaustive and reliable data. Uncertainties could be accounted for by applying Monte Carlo techniques to time domain simulation, but a large computational effort would be implied. Static cascading simulation approaches are more suitable to carry out probabilistic cascading evaluation. However, the issue of consistency between static and dynamic simulation outcome arises. The present paper reports results from benchmarking quasi-static, cascading simulation used in the operational risk assessment tool PRACTICE against a time domain simulator. The comparison, performed on the model of a realistic power system, highlights the consistency of the quasi-static approach with time domain simulations at least in the early stages of cascading.","PeriodicalId":149134,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cascadings in large power systems: Benchmarking static vs. time domain simulation\",\"authors\":\"E. Ciapessoni, D. Cirio, A. Pitto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PESGM.2014.6939469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cascading stems from the interaction between control, protection, and defense systems, and it is affected by uncertainties in system models and external factors. An evaluation of cascading thus requires the collection of exhaustive and reliable data. Uncertainties could be accounted for by applying Monte Carlo techniques to time domain simulation, but a large computational effort would be implied. Static cascading simulation approaches are more suitable to carry out probabilistic cascading evaluation. However, the issue of consistency between static and dynamic simulation outcome arises. The present paper reports results from benchmarking quasi-static, cascading simulation used in the operational risk assessment tool PRACTICE against a time domain simulator. The comparison, performed on the model of a realistic power system, highlights the consistency of the quasi-static approach with time domain simulations at least in the early stages of cascading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2014.6939469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2014.6939469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

级联源于控制、保护和防御系统之间的相互作用,并受系统模型的不确定性和外部因素的影响。因此,对级联的评价需要收集详尽和可靠的数据。不确定性可以通过蒙特卡罗技术应用于时域模拟来解释,但这意味着大量的计算工作。静态级联仿真方法更适合进行概率级联评估。然而,静态和动态仿真结果之间的一致性问题出现了。本文报告了在操作风险评估工具PRACTICE中针对时域模拟器使用的准静态级联模拟的基准测试结果。在一个实际电力系统模型上进行的比较表明,准静态方法至少在级联的早期阶段与时域仿真是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cascadings in large power systems: Benchmarking static vs. time domain simulation
Cascading stems from the interaction between control, protection, and defense systems, and it is affected by uncertainties in system models and external factors. An evaluation of cascading thus requires the collection of exhaustive and reliable data. Uncertainties could be accounted for by applying Monte Carlo techniques to time domain simulation, but a large computational effort would be implied. Static cascading simulation approaches are more suitable to carry out probabilistic cascading evaluation. However, the issue of consistency between static and dynamic simulation outcome arises. The present paper reports results from benchmarking quasi-static, cascading simulation used in the operational risk assessment tool PRACTICE against a time domain simulator. The comparison, performed on the model of a realistic power system, highlights the consistency of the quasi-static approach with time domain simulations at least in the early stages of cascading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solution quality analysis on predictive economic dispatch with time Electric generators for biomass waste to energy systems Speed up of data-driven state estimation using low-complexity indexing method Cascadings in large power systems: Benchmarking static vs. time domain simulation Real-time energy management strategies for microgrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1